-
Content Сount
21 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
2912 -
Clan
[HEROZ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Captain_Thomas_
-
im sorry about the promised thing but that what i was hoping the hold reason i started playing this game was because of USN CV and not to become a IJN CV player but can you please watch the video thanks
-
Please read the comment from others
-
Dear WG community This is your Capt speaking we are at the breakingpoint if not pass that we need the loadout setup we was promised in 0.3.1 with 2 TB for ranger and here you made this a DB hungry game for the USN CV i have got so much better the last time i spoken on the forums i can get 1k exp game with the stock loadout but that not fun. I mean well dont forget even if we get alot of money we still have a high cost to buy the next USN CV the exp we are getting is not enough and well i am tierd of NON USN CV telling people that you need to get better but most of the time they dont. I am Captain of my own USN Carrier USS FireStorm and she is not a ranger class CV but wait im still using the stock loadout now that saying something we are force to stay Stock loadout where the IJN CV are more of a fun gameplay i swear there hardly any USN CV players here anyone please can you give us back are power. i understand your point about avg player, good player, Newbie but have you have to remember we dont want siding when it come to nation a lot of my friends ask me which is the best nation, and i was like for what CV i said IJN even though i play USN CV it a super gain for USN CV and im not willing to do it im doing it because i want the USS Essex but im sorry for all the bad report your getting WG,WG community it really not need but we could change something to give USN CV there exp gain a little bit more fun and awarding this is your Capt speaking have a nice time and hope to see you on the seas. One more thing this guy will tell you everything i was saying to you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Azhx4Ai4yeA&index=2&list=PLBjjvcwG5KT3EuRoL0dJRuuMqctwo7hlR strong lanuage. Regertz Capt.Thomas USS Carrier FireStorm
-
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
Yes sir I hope to see IJN CV AND USN CV setup changed as soon as possible -
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
but that only if it hit the 1 TB+DB is not ever good but i will try it out again but 1F+ 2TB it not simply too good it good enough to bring back the battle. and if you look closely he losted planes on the attack as well what about this setup you had what happen to that ? as you can see for the setup it only if you hit there no poweredness for this 2TB i have research as best as i can stats and damge all of damge (IF ALL HIT) and remember im asking this for tier 6-7 not 4-5 there fine they dont need change maybe tier 5 but it good enough grind for tier 6 and it test the player to see if he really want to be USN CV player. regretz Capt.Thomas USS Carrier FireStorm -
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
BigBadVuk, on 08 July 2015 - 10:53 AM, said: Avoid multiple posts one after antoher - use EDIT instead please. yes sir the old setup where you had this from the video look good enough -
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
I have looked up all videos and gameplay i have even watch how to use manual to a point that im pro with it i miss on average 2/3 so i maybe new to world of warships but i have been watching it for along time so i know what saying everyone playing BBs CS DS so little for USN CV i only see 4 to 5 max waiting for a game -
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
McCracken666, on 08 July 2015 - 09:01 AM, said: No matter how pro anyone are, the technique to insta kill enemy BB or CA over and over, has to stop. What the did historically dosnt count for anything if it ruins gameplay. This is game, not real life. Gameplay > realism. We want balanced ships across the whole game, CV's will never get useless even when balance tweaks remove the über doomsday weapon they have in the current state. it work fine what takeda setup i think it good and it the TD job if done right to one shoot if all hits remember if all hits have two TD USN CV tier 6 is good idea everyone showing me tier 8-10 gameplay what about the tier 6-7 from there you should know the only way to earn exp is TD sir so im sorry you dont like the change because everyone who play USN CV if there any left would love the idea of making exp again we can sit here something 2 TD is not fair and i dont think the USN CV tier 6-7 should have it where tier 8-10 have it and 3-4 DB to make it more OP so what your trying to tell me iter 6-7 should be a suprt grind i been come on the exp to get to the next ship is hard enough without having the chance of doing 100k-150k to get the right have enough exp to get to the big boys i believe you try out the 2 TB for tier 6-7 for a month see where it go and if you really dont like it give us more DB which do damge then will be happy i mean have you seen the AA power tier 6-7 im sure you have if two or more ships are close to eachother TD sqaudron will be destroyed Regretz Capt.Thomas USS Carrier FireStorm -
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
You Guy are talking backwards all of you stop showing great playeers at tier 8-10 we are not talking about that we are talking about that we are talking about the general USN CV a few good players does speak for 5 thousands other one. just let takeda do the job because it works everyone balance you guys are sounding like allowing this to happen will kill BBs CS more is that what your scared of ? let me tell you that what your saying and trying to showing off is not good enough for USN CV crying out for help many players stop play USN CV or just go to BBs or maybe CS or turn into IJN players which is bad everyone know IJN strongest nation right now. I bet someone going to tell me there not because they are on USN searching for a game there so many BBs it turning in to a BBs game the CV players for both nation will be change to give each one a fighting chanc. like i said before thing will be working find after this change hopefully we dont need more BBs we have alot of them, more than enough BBs players dont like us because we have a chance to kill them if there going alone. historically the CV was made to kill BBs and CV if they can do there job then what the point of them showing me pro player status talk about a average one first all people aint pro you know just keep the change you said Takeda the USN and IJN will love you after. Regretz Capt.Thomas USS Carrier FireStorm DtXpwnz, on 08 July 2015 - 01:03 AM, said: We have to look at damage, look at this video at time 6:40, this is what american TBs do... btw Independence does have same torpedo dmg as midway, so what you are saying is that tier 6 could do this to Izumo theoretically. And right now tier 6 CV is matched mostly against T5, sometimes T6 (I just sold Ryujo, because I unlocked tier 7, so I have pretty good idea how the MM looks now). It would be epic oneshotting everything on that tier though But it would double the amount of CV OP topics edit: look at what Sharana posted: It is interesting to see that massive dmg jump from Lexington to Essex, that is like +70% dmg immediately, which is caused by that second TB squadron. He is right the secound TB which make this all happen good spoting DtXpwnz #25 that even show my point even more 2 TD make a different for USN CV DtXpwnz, on 08 July 2015 - 01:03 AM, said: We have to look at damage, look at this video at time 6:40, this is what american TBs do... btw Independence does have same torpedo dmg as midway, so what you are saying is that tier 6 could do this to Izumo theoretically. And right now tier 6 CV is matched mostly against T5, sometimes T6 (I just sold Ryujo, because I unlocked tier 7, so I have pretty good idea how the MM looks now). It would be epic oneshotting everything on that tier though But it would double the amount of CV OP topics edit: look at what Sharana posted: It is interesting to see that massive dmg jump from Lexington to Essex, that is like +70% dmg immediately, which is caused by that second TB squadron. All so if you watch the game you will see what happen when players choose to work together to show TD DB attacks if you go alone only you will died alone BBs group up or BBs group up with CS problem balances -
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
Takeda92, on 08 July 2015 - 12:41 AM, said: Well if AA was too much then either buff planes survivability or nerf that AA.. soft stats! Again you're not looking at the big picture. There are cruisers and battleships and carriers that won't stand an attack from 2 TBs of tier 6.. especially not from a fighter deck. You just can't look at some ships that have strong AA and say you can't attack those! i understand what your saying but i been looking at all of them trust me have a look again for tier 6-7 and you will see the AA power is beast mode for BBs CS OK try taking out the tier 6-7 USN CV and just use the begining setup and tell me how much damge you do on average damge you do and if you can kill or even change the battlefield from a lost to a win 10/10 game and tell me how you did feel our pain before you say buff -
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
Takeda92, on 08 July 2015 - 12:06 AM, said: I was kind of doing compromises when it came to fighter/bomber balance. As you can see tier 7 IJN is not that strong bomber wise but it can go peer to peer to US fighters, possibly defeat them at lower tiers. If tier 6 USN CV would not be hard hitting enough for its strike deck then it can be changed to 1/2/1 but with not so strong TBs mmmm. well i can see where your come from mate with TD but if you would take out any tier 5-6 BBs CS out and try out the 2TB and see how close you have to get before you lost all your planes Takeda92, on 08 July 2015 - 12:06 AM, said: I was kind of doing compromises when it came to fighter/bomber balance. As you can see tier 7 IJN is not that strong bomber wise but it can go peer to peer to US fighters, possibly defeat them at lower tiers. If tier 6 USN CV would not be hard hitting enough for its strike deck then it can be changed to 1/2/1 but with not so strong TBs ok we need to stop looking at the damge it may do.we need to look at the range the USN TD can get before being shot down by AA the reason for this is not the godlike damge it so USN planes can try sandbox there targets to get the best tactics. like i said before it the AA everyone need to worry about not the TD damge it does better if the shot down 4-5 of them in there first strick that just one squadron think about it regretz Capt.Thomas USS Carrier FireStorm -
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
DtXpwnz, on 07 July 2015 - 11:44 PM, said: don't be silly thats quite regularly oneshot for any T7 ship and below im not being silly and that if they learn to aim well at far range what you have to remeber the AA will eat TB AND DB at close range so give the USN a chance please give it a try i promise it will make playing so much better Vulgarny, on 07 July 2015 - 11:46 PM, said: Yea that idea is strait 110k dmg at least with 2 TB it all fun and games but have you used th Tier 6 USN carrier yet ? i bet not or you would know why im pushing for this so hard and that good enough to exp USN carrier like i said it nothing if you cant aim at (FAR RANGE) from around 2.6km-2.8km all US planes are destroyed.I think about what you say before saying it please -
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
Well i think so far it look kind of good but it who be nice to see the 2 TB for tier 6,7 for Fighter deck what you have to remember is the the how exp systerm the only way to get 1-2k+ is to do 50k or more damge in a game so i really think adding one more 2 TB USN Fight deck wont hurt anyone much this give the USN CV a chance to grind without feeling like it a worst of time maybe give tier 6 USN F 2 FIGHTER 2TB 0 DB. The reason i say this is because the AA is strong for high tier 6-8 so if we have 2 TB we can learn how to you them better at far range so this should be fine for USN i look in to the speed and how far TB USN go and how fast as well it should be good enough with the balancing Regretz Capt.Thomas USS Carrier FireStorm -
Suggestion about general CV balance
Captain_Thomas_ replied to Takeda92's topic in General Discussion
You have my full support i believe the setup you have chosen work well enought for both nation i say green light on this as soon as possible. Bring back are USN CV AND IJN CV independence. Regretz Capt Thomas USS Carrier FireStorm -
Spellfire40, on 07 July 2015 - 05:13 PM, said: 2US TB flights are way wore powerfull than 3 IJN also for an IJN to field 3 Flights he sacrifices any form of selfdefence up to T9. Staying on your Idependece: each of your TB does more than 1k more damage than the IJN and if you have Practive you will hit with way more because of the tight manual drop of the US compared to the IJN. But not only that you want the same number of TB than an IJN without sacrificing your fighters for it. Thats why i said dream on. Ryojowith its 1 fighter Deck has to be lucky to shoot down 2 of your Torpedobombers when unasisted by AA. You on the other hand can probaly kill 4 to 6 TB (someone can confirm im not high enogh in the US line yet) before running out of ammo. I did played up to essex in OBT around 10 to 15 Torpedo hits on a "balanced" with 1 TB loadout were not too uncomon in an very AA heavy enviroment.. One of my best games in a stike essex in CBT looked like this : Can you Imaging If you see that kind of results in T5 to 8 in US CV? Well your TB wont be as fast but 20 plus hits should be posibe . But the outcry would be much greater than anything you get now for nerf IJN CV please. Cya Giving more Exp for killing planes in an CV was asked for a zillion time in the CBT forum. Spellfire40 well it the only way US CV will be happy if no TB bombers we need to be making exp from something im tierd of playing begining loadout for US CV IT JUST NOT FUN ANYMORE. And i did do the whole manual aimming for DB in CO-op battle to try work on my aim i fight 7/10 with only doing 3-4k damge if anything. Im not asking to nerf IJN CV im just asking for a buff of something so i dont see the whole player base jap Captain_Thomas_, on 07 July 2015 - 05:45 PM, said: well it the only way US CV will be happy if no TB bombers we need to be making exp from something im tierd of playing begining loadout for US CV IT JUST NOT FUN ANYMORE. And i did do the whole manual aimming for DB in CO-op battle to try work on my aim i fight 7/10 with only doing 3-4k damge if anything. Im not asking to nerf IJN CV im just asking for a buff of something so i dont see the whole player base jap WE need exp and we are just not getting hard any. you show me status for Tier 10/ im talking about tier 6-8 tier 5 US CV should be a grind to see if the player really want to be carrier player like i did but when you get there tell me why i had to spend 10 hours to upgrade my fighters and TB and i have premium
-
what about a test run for US CV for giving them more exp for shooting down planes maybe something like 30-40 planes destroy 2.5-3.5k exp maybe
-
_Ezio_, on 07 July 2015 - 03:50 PM, said: 2Squadrons is a pretty high loss considering that one only has 1 1/4 reserve for each TB lost. It's even worse for the DB's, which are so UP compared to the US ones it only hurts. Most players simply go and say, "It can't be that I only shot down 40Planes with my bad FlaK it needs a buff, can't do crap against a CV!", while thge CV curses that he lost all planes against a single ship... mmmmh. well i dont really understand what your trying to say but i really do think we need a new patch to give the uss back there standing point on the battlefield we are dead weight for tier 6 carrier Takeda92, on 07 July 2015 - 04:14 PM, said: Cpt Thomas.. can you think of the consequences of what you are suggesting before suggesting them? Thank you! why cant we have old loadout I mean something is better than nothing as WG member we need to think of balance right ? IJN CV are the best thing to play right now (US CV are trying there best to fight back) but nothing there do is working we need a balance for US CV which does make them dead weight on battlefield (BB are just big cry babies running around all alone and wondering why they are being killed ) Now back to other points you want to make about not giving us a fighting chance we are just not winning anything or making a difference TB are scaring of TB with there AA power. ok let start talking real for a sec buff the DB will just make IJN more powerful and will not do much for US mmmmmmh, maybe we need to rethink the loadout for US CV i think what i have seen and asked for it a bit too much . What about buffing the speed for TB for US to attack start or make the Torps to move faster maybe ? that while help SpellFire40 what do you have to say about this
-
_Ezio_, on 07 July 2015 - 03:47 PM, said: Wait a moment. You lose everything in a US CV? Thats a good one. Askt a IJN CV player about lossing planes and you will learn what real losses are. And since when does the T6 IJN CV have 7Squadrons? the Shokaku got 6 at T8 same for T7 Hiryu, the Ruyjo got 5Squadrons. If you check the status on both tier 6 CV IJN and US you will see they have 5 for IJN and 3 for US mean 20 vs 18 number when are fighters if 1 can only shoot down 2/3 before running out of ammo then you will know we dont stand a chance if we are not searching the whole map to see if there coming for my USS Carrier FireStorm and if not a change with are loadout let the american have two CV division would be kind of OP but there nothing we can do
-
sorry for mulit post im new to speaking on forums but like i said we need a change 2 TD may or may not make us better than in battle because if you check it out the AA for alone BBs CS can destroy are planes easily
-
But what you have to understand the AA for tier 6 and higher are so strong i cant get TB run without losting everything same with DB i have my independence sitting in my hanger wishing for it to get better we need something please there no hope with DB there not good at all just 2TB that will i ask if you think about it IJN have more planes the americans I just had a look at the IJN CV and they have 5 squadrons with a total of 20 planes in sky the US CV only has 3 squadrons with 18 they out numbers us but even through they out numbers us we can shoot down maybe 2 squadron before running out of ammo and we have nothing to kill there carrier with at tier 6 like i said before you are force to use the begining loadout for US CV regrets Captain Thomas USS FireStorm
-
Dear WG/WG community I think the US CV or CAs which ever you want to call it is useless because you cant do anything right you cant cover your team or yourself . so little fighter squadrons playing full defence make your team hate you, you cant even play full attack with 1TD and 2DB the new loadouts just doesn't work for US CV player commuity it just make use look but to BBs CSs, we are just easy kills to everyone.The low tier US CV was alright for you getting the feel for thing but what happen when you get to tier 5 and 6 you get eaten you are force to keep starting loadout.I think the tier 4 having this was kind of fine but tier 5 and 6 is just taking the piss. tier 6 is the biggest lay down you still have the same amount of squadron( 1 DB added to US CV to make three squadron vs the IJN 7 squadron you might as well say the US Navy lost the fight at sea) from tier 5 and 6 and above we really need a super buff to tell the truth. The amount of time people call me crap when I vs IJN CV is upseting they have so many squadron i cant kill them all even when IJN CV have full attacking loadout they can eat me alive i have to hope to get get IJN CV on my team to give him air cover i think you need to make loadout for US CV different remember US own the war with jap not lose it.but this is a game so let the US CV stay a chance. The only thing which can even make us better is crew skill which is so far to get to which who just add 1 more DB and FS which i dont need, I need TB there my only damge output for my team and myself at tier 6 and high BBs CS DS there AA is too good i cant even get one good run on BBs with losting all or half my squadron. here the loadout I think will balance for US CV bring them back to the battle and stop this game from turning in to a BBS CS game oh yeah I cant forget little devils destroyers Tier 4 Load out is fine dont need any changes Tier 5 2 Fighters 1TB loadout MK 1 , 1 fighter 2TB loadout mk 2 ,1Fighter 1TB 1DB start off loadout Tier 6 3/4 fighters 2TB loadout Mk 1, 4 fighters 1TB loadout Mk 2mk 2, 1fighter 3TB start off loadout By now you might have a idea of what im asking for we need more power.that and make are TB move fast or make the TB bombers itself get a speed buff so we can use it from far range 5.5mk making a 40 MPH to make up for BBs turning time and AA buff that you did just to give us chance of doing something Regrets Captain Thomas USS Carrier FireStorm
