HMS_Worcester

Wyoming......hands down! I never seem to have a good battle in it. And yet I quite enjoyed it in CBT....things change I guess.

My "OP" list is based on what other people are saying, not my personal opinion.

I will try

Awww, I need my super pay2win uber BB NOW!!!

Ah, I'm not that bothered anymore. If it takes another two months for them to give us the ship I don't mind waiting. At this point I'm more interested in 0.5.5 coming out smoothly and just being able to play again.

I was not saying all the others, but as many as are considered OP/p2w. OP/p2w - Atago, Murmansk, Gremy, Imp Nik, MK UP/broken - Mikasa, Ishizuchi, Yubari, Albany (probably more that I'm not aware of)

I'm pretty sure they said you needed to use the same email address. I set up my PTS account using the same email as my normal account. Edit: Yep, just checked my email and have been able to claim the reward. As Xerkics said, you will have to contact support.

Fixed

I have taken this list from LittleWhiteMouse's review page of premium ships. (I'm not sure if any are missing) Available Ships: Atlanta, Atago, Aurora, Ishizuchi, Murmansk Pre Order Ships: Sims, Yubari, Gremyashchy Limited Release Ships: Tirpitz, Fujin, Warspite, Mikasa, Imperator Nikolai I, Mikhail Kutuzov, Blyskawica, Anshan, Lo Yang, Saipan Gift & Reward Ships: Albany, Arkansas, Iwaki, Tachibana, Kamikaze, Diana, Emden, Marblehead Arpeggio of Blue Steel Ships: Kongo, Myoko Going by what people have been saying, I have marked the "OP/p2w" ships in green. In my mind this argument of it being a real, game breaking problem only makes sense if at least half or more premium ships are "OP/p2w", which as you can see only a small number are. In fact almost as many premiums are considered "UP/broken" in some way. So really it would be more accurate to say:

We are up to 7 pages already, I'm quite impressed. I remember there was a troll thread on the WoT EU forum that lasted 24 pages! 24!!!! 24 pages of nothing but racism and insults and yet the mods did nothing for ages! Edit: I do remember the player's name and I'm pretty sure he was banned due to the thread.

That is one of the truest statements I have seen on this forum for a LONG time.

Except that is hasn't sunk....

It is an "interesting" idea for keeping people playing isn't it....

That made me laugh way more than it should have done....

Fascinating....

I can imagine

I was angry for a moment when I first saw it was being delayed.....and then my mood changed the second I saw WHY it was being delayed. We dodged a bullet on that one.

Thanks for the info Mr Murphy. I think most people are just glad it was not our server that got the problems first!