Johnny_Moneto

Please close. There is nothing to see here.

With modded side panels that used to be the case also in Scenarios. Has been surpressed several patches ago.

As far as the port interface (which include DM, players search, etc.) is concerned we must be grateful for already having an electronic version and that we don't have to send a paper letter to WG headquarters with the request which ship we plan to play at which time or when and with whom we plan to play in a division. Each form would require, of course, 7 carbon copies. Feedback after reporting is a concept unknown on their side of the iron curtain.

That is actually the realistic gun sound from the space battles from several years ago.

I have posted it in a (now censor edited) thread long time ago. I sent a complaint about the AI to customer support but was just being made fun of. Then I sent feedback to this thread and was happilly ignored: Bots torp teammates when there is no enemy around, they specifically aim at the player as he would be an enemy. Also WG decided to fill up random battles with bots. Another great example how customer feedback is handled by WG. Flushed down the toilet would be a mild expression.

When WG introduced the concept of having one client for different servers I was curious what would happen on patch day. Usually NA gets its version patch several hours before EU. Right now we are in this "in between time" and I tried to start the NA account - does not work, the error message tells me it is an outdated version but it does not let me install the new one. WG, I understand that I cannot have both version running at the same time but why can't I choose whether I already want to play the update on NA (and obviously cannot play EU anymore until that server is updated) if I have an account on both EU and NA? Adding @Crysantos as this might be a little gap in the scheme.

I don't care for rewards. If we win fast because I capped, I am happy to move on to the next battle hoping for a better match composition.

If I add two more things: In the beginning after you got spotted by planes you keep course and speed. A salvo comes in and you were lucky not to lose HP there. Change course/speed after a detection as enemies will take shots at you. Much later you capped A and went towards B. But you did not enter the cap. Instead you parked between A and B and wasted time, smoke, and torps. Your team was behind on points.

That telephone is the reason why I switched to another port, no kidding.

I think that makes the game more complex without adding any advantage. Since many players already struggle with the current complexity of the game, I have to say thank you but no.

Personally I find this highly offensive and wish it would never have made it into the game. Gay Koala, however, doesn't bother me in the slightest.

Was nice to meet you nevertheless. You did quite well if I may say so.

Das ist ja fast schon kriminell. Meine Ryujo ist da leider nicht so gut. Wie gesagt, ich brauche mehr Zeit bei DDs, die dann später beim Schaden austeilen fehlt. Ausserdem muss ich häufig "unattraktive" Ziele anfliegen, um Versäumnisse meines Teams zu kompensieren. Keine Ahnung wie Du das alles hinbekommst. https://na.wows-numbers.com/player/1015004861,Lazy_Joe/

Ach so, Du meinst "arc". Danke. Flugbahn klingt doch auch gut.

Oh, Du auch?

Der Bow?

Bei der Ryujo habe ich das Gefühl, dass die Streuung der Raketen den Damage auf DDs deutlich reduziert hat. Deckt sich das mit Deiner Erkenntnis? Ich brauche nun ein paar Anflüge mehr (=mehr Zeit) um einen DD zu versenken.

Were you just partially submerged? Less than 6 meters?

EVEN WINNING FEELS BORING. Can you please stop with that win-lose thingy? The battles themselves are often not entertaining. What does help me that my team wins if the enemy team doesn't provide a proper challenge? To put it in other words: You argue that even a loss can be entertaining while OP and myself say that the outcome of the match is not the cause for the complaint. Your entire argumentation, as nice as it was, is just beside the point.

They can increase the player base up to 1 million, if the battles bore me I will be out.

WG, you mean well by letting us try the new machanics, but I will not install a third instance of your game (after live and PTS). So...

Many players already fail to understand the concept of caps as it is. Let's not make it even more complicated.

The question is: how would be the user experience on average? Maybe you are right and the matches cannot be more exciting than they currently are. In that case we are doomed (to find something else for leisure time).

Your entire text is pointless. @Malhadras pointed that even winning often feels boring. So, the balancing of players is to make battles more intersting on average.

Saturday evening - 30k players connected. Plenty of my shells land in enemy ships and just disappear. WG, I hope the desync issue is top on your to do list.