Hogger4169

AYAYAYAYA PUERTO RICO

she costs 240€ This is the wargaming definition of <<free>>

Since it is the only "official" stat, we will use this. But taking account stats per tier requires changes in the game and only god knows if the developers want /are willing to fix it. Stats per tier requires some work to be done, this is my opinion A brief explanation. Let's imagine that MM wants same tier and -/+ 5 % win rate, the stats of my account that the MM can see is: t5 45%, t6 44% t7 48% etc. if I choose to play with t5 the MM will find players with t5 ships with win rate 40-45%. And to be sarcastic, that was a nice dream!!!!

Nononononononono…. NO NO NO!!! from my last rank battle, me 44%win rate while team mates had 56, 62 55 47 and the opposing them had 55, 43, 61 57, 48 win rate. Average win rate, the stat that is visible in your profile in the game, no stars, no nothing else. this win rate

Not a single "pillow" (irrevocable) from 12 to 1, if you want the steel play until you die or get lucky!!!!!!! TOO MANY SMOLENSKS, limit on one per team. Kremlins? I destroyed many with my ohio, Smolensk is THE problem. I can't blame the t10 wallet obtained players, the game gave them the ability, so be it. MM based on winrate +/-5% will solve many problems my 2 cents

My opinion, Because of the game's mechanics and the almighty (bless me please) RNGesus, BB gameplay must me adapted, and I did. Using HE from long distance to hope for a module incapitation or fire is a big bonus against AP where we risk with bounces or overpens that makes you smash the keyboard. Since the game is "written" this way after frustration (and a few smashed keyboards [joking]) I adapted my gameplay on BB's and HE on long distances and AP when permitted. Since the game is written this way me must/should adapt and enjoy sinking each other, HAVE FUN!!!

Good morning... In a streak of 5 battles with Hindenburg a few moments ago I had 1 lose and 4 wins, that is a winrate of 80%!!!!! (super dooper unicun!!!!!) But as we all know there will be a streak of wins or loses so the sample I gave is not accurate. Used the matchmaking monitor to try to understand the composition of the teams which I posted them belo to make you assumptions, conclusions etc etc etc Here are the images of 4 battles (missed one, sorry) ...

Happy [?] Tuesday, and we'll see.... Snarky comment alert In the next event, the rewards will have to be bought!!!! Sorry WG, you gave me the right to write this....

Although I am not in top positions (top 50%) the tokens will be useful to buy some goodies. But not crediting the tokens and postpone them for the next patch is something at least shameful. Once again you hit the <<ceiling>> WG. *edit, I found it Why it has to be so complicated??????

Something funny , enjoy...………………... When rng hates you When rng loves you rank 3 with Fuso and grinding...….

Since they mentioned about containers and super containers, the second ones the super container are scarce at least. Winning the joker in my country with a combination 5 of 45 numbers and 1 in 20 (5+1) is 1 in 24.435.180. Winning a super container in wows is even greater more.... (1 in 1.000.000.000~ maybe)

My fault, sorry about that.

I disagree because the difference from tier to tier is big. If the advantage was minimum it would be ok. I played some all tier 10 games, found it challenging and made me try a little more than I could. If was the tier 2 gap I simply would choose the weakest in terms of tier and would have done my "duty" in the team.

How hard is to get rid of this matchmaking nightmare and have one simple rule. SAME TIER SHIPS AND STATS BALANCE as second but same tier as primary and unchanged rule. Haven't had a screenshot but with t7 vs t9 is nightmare and according to matchmaking monitor my team had winrate 42% vs the other who had 51%, another data was that my team had 35 battles experience vs the others who had 150~. You may say that the rooms will have long filling time but the battles will be much better imo some screenshots from a random battle...

Against my initial thought I did reset the ijn cruisers (I have yoshino for t10). Still the grind is brutal because you get 500*2 (for now) tokens for the first win and only that. They could do the grinding more fun if they gave the 10% for every 1st win every day.

Well.... this is for us, I guess

great matchmaking!!!!

Or even more "extreme", same tier in all ships. Even more fair and interesting battles!!!! Think about it...

As we say in Greece.... Στου κουφου την πορτα οσο θελεις βροντα… On deaf man's door knock knock for as long as you can!!!! (he will not listen) Have fun with this "new feature".... Ohio here I come...

Nice poll, but... Why the rush to publish research bureau? Why so sparse "rewards"? (Colbert, flags, free xp. the promised ohio would justify the attempt to regrind partially) Why USA bb Ohio not out with the upgrade? Who can guarantee (promises are meant to break) that ohio will be a reward in the research bureau and not as a new shiny premium ship in the store? Questions are not for the publisher of the poll, is to problematize us and think a bit...

Wargaming, you expect to regrind for this award? And the promise (that you somesomesomesomesometimes keep) of a new ship??? Ohio seems to be a monster and you ask me to reset us bb line for a ship that it will be added sometime in a patch? Or to buy doubloons to gain free xp? With the majority of your playerbase say no to this feature you still publish it in the near future GAMBLING that in the start we will nag and in the end we will participate.... Instead trying to make the game more appealing for new players to join the WOWS you try to drain the "cow"... PATHETIC "STRATEGY"!!!

https://youtu.be/uP0sC_s5EfE that's what they're asking, again and again and again and again and again and again...………………….

for me it shows your participation in battlle, you know... damage....sink....win.... etcetcetc…. I insist that sometimes stats are not reflecting true, an example... in a battle 12 vs 12 team a has a a player who is good and on the other side team b has 9 good players. in team a the good player does an excellent game but due to the incompetence of the teammates on team a the good player of team a loses. this is false to player who had the best performance and on team b 3 players were afk and earned a not deserved increase of stats. I wanted to say that in a team play different factors can rig the stats. individual stats can't get rigged because it is player a vs player b. happens all the time...

@El2aZeR Some info about stats link I put basis in the pic below in the <<avg damage>> column