Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Aerroon

Community Contributor
  • Content Сount

    2,268
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    12119
  • Clan

    [TSUN]

Everything posted by Aerroon

  1. Aerroon

    General Feedback (Round 1)

    Loading times are TOO LONG. My game is on an SSD, I have 24GB of RAM and an i7-4790k with a GTX 780 yet I still can't get into the match before my planes are ready to launch. What the hell did you guys do in this patch? Even Ocean takes a long time to load so it's not the addition of foliage.
  2. Aerroon

    Aviation Changes (Round 1)

    Welcome to WoWS where your feedback is not heard. If it was then we wouldn't be getting patch after patch that makes CV gameplay worse. CV gameplay was great BEFORE 0.3.1 after that it has been getting worse by the patch. But feedback from what I got: - US CVs are still torture to play. Boring and frustrating as hell. - Barrage seems completely useless or I haven't understood how to use the skill at all. The amount of time it takes to use it and the lock in period just means that my fighters are usually going to lose. - Scouts are still bugged and panic bomber squadrons. - Planes seem to handle differently where they are much more likely to start doing derpy circles BEFORE the point of no return. - IJN CV fighter layout leaves US CVs absolutely no chance of ever doing anything. And because it's guaranteed that you have another CV against you that will always be the strongest layout. - My unupgraded Essex fighters lost a fight to upgraded Ranger fighters 2vs2 every time we fought. - Manual torpedo bombing is derpy as hell. It's difficult to torpedo bomb near islands or near other ships because I can't tell where exactly the torpedoes will hit the water. - Manual dive bombing still stops the planes when they start the engage for some random amount of time which can completely screw your drop since you can't know how much to lead since the time is essentially random.
  3. Hey, I made a video today that is me getting 16 citadel hits in a match. The match only lasted for 6 minutes! So this means you can get more than double that in terms of citadel hits in a match, right? Video: So I want to know: what's your record number of citadel hits in a single match?
  4. I think the issue is rather that nothing at below tier 5 in cruiser has any armor so anything can penetrate them with AP. I wonder if destroyers can score regular citadels too.
  5. Aerroon

    Aerroon Playing WoWS Highlights

    Omaha vs destroyers:
  6. Aerroon

    UltraHD (4K) scaling

    Really? Because it runs like crap for me. Isn't the amount of GPU memory required a bit too high for that?
  7. Well maybe that would be the buffs needed then? Limit the number of torpedoes but torpedoes can't be detected by anything and when you get hit your ship will start sinking and there is nothing you can do about it.
  8. Aerroon

    Aerroon Playing WoWS Highlights

    First Langley Match - 7.7k exp:
  9. Omaha seems to be very strong in this thread.
  10. It's a video game. The planes tend to fly at a set altitude from the ground this means if they're going over mountains they ascend and then descend even though in reality they could've just gone straight
  11. Aerroon

    0.4.1 Patch question

    No I'm not: I don't think this change will really make much of a difference.
  12. Aerroon

    Patch Notes 4.1

    So the one destroyer that actually seemed decent for its tier got nerfed? Well done Wargaming, well done. Perhaps we need another round of nerfs to destroyers, just to beat the dead horse even more?
  13. Now THIS is what I was hoping to see. 25 citadels? That's insane. So you guys want me to essentially just play battleships and multiple games in a row? Sounds like a very boring video. Perhaps you should just watch me stream instead? Or hell, you could even just look at the 24 hour stream I had on twitch's past broadcasts here: http://www.twitch.tv/aerroon/b/681865561 I played enough battleships during it that someone even said "please don't play battleships right now" Also I would say average is about 2-5 citadels in a game at North Carolina levels.
  14. Aerroon

    [Guide] Basic Carrier Guide

    I am very very sorry for pushing this up.
  15. Aerroon's Basic Carrier Guide: Questions and feedback are welcome. I'm not quite satisfied with this as I had to cut quite a bit of content from it, because it was way too long. Still ended up being too long but I didn't know what else to cut without redoing more than half of it.
  16. Aerroon

    So here's my resolution to Colorado class

    No, I don't think the Colorado should be removed. I think the ship is terrible but I had to suffer through the terrible so all of you should as well. Also, North Carolina at tier 7 would be insane.
  17. Aerroon

    Questionnaire reward? What does 1xD Research Unit Mean?

    Clearly you are now allowed to use the "xD" emoticon once in chat.
  18. Aerroon

    Aerroon Playing WoWS Highlights

    Why can't I hold all these citadels?
  19. Aerroon

    Reminder to check WoT these days.

    How does I grab the tank?
  20. Aerroon

    Bonus for best players in the match?

    How about bonus for all classes except CV? Since CVs can have a maximum of 4 players and often can even just have 1.
  21. Aerroon

    Easy fix to the Broken aspect of carriers.

    Who? What do you consider "competent"? But your win rate with carriers is 61%. And I think the issue isn't nearly as big as you make it out to be. I mean your highest tier ship is tier 5 on EU. You haven't even gotten to a tier where cruisers get the panic ability yet. Isn't it a bit too early to come up with grand conclusions about what the game balance is like?
  22. Aerroon

    Performance boost MAYBE

    Yup, I get similar numbers.
  23. Aerroon

    Performance boost MAYBE

    Now I would like somebody else to confirm this. My main gripe seems to be that the game can eat up a monstrous amount of video memory.
  24. Hey is there actually a benefit to drawing the match? Do you get more experience for it? I heard that you get the same as losing?
×