Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

lmperial_Japanese_Navy

Players
  • Content Сount

    240
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    5613
  • Clan

    [IJN]

Everything posted by lmperial_Japanese_Navy

  1. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Azur Lane: Third Wave

    Hmmm so i noticed the pictures of Atago with azur lane skin in the store appeared with historical AA layouts but when i checked the Atago in the game it still has only one single barrle type 96 ? AA layout update confirmed for the next update ?
  2. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Armada: Kidd

    I want a premium of Akizuki-class, do it !
  3. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Lunar New Year: Last Chance!

    600+ sek for the Izumo lolololol it is not even a paper ship designed by the Chinese, this is not even a unique new battleship !! Izumo in Chinese tree aka ''Pan-Asia'' totally not making any sense. Yeah, i will be gone from this game for awhile again until something else new and affordable, cya WG.
  4. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Update 0.8.11: New Year

    For some reason WG still believe the Yudachi is a competitive DD at tier 7 and no buffs is given lol Please take one your developers and play this ship at least once.
  5. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    [LAST CHANCE!] Black Friday Sales

    LoL Waited for black friday because i considered of buying the Kii, turned out not a single ship in the store is discounted but only those black ships i don't want. That is a really disappointment... Welp, at least my money is safe :D
  6. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Battleship Poltava and "Resolute and Rapid" Containers!

    Wow wow, easy there, no need for attacking where one come from ? Christ lol Entire nation ? Or you know the nation in the game ? what else do you want me to call it ? lol Besides i didn't blame the Russian people for not building battleships ? All i did was stating the true fact about how Russia had no advanced battleships from the interwar period, second world war and to the point where Battleships became obsolete, or am i wrong ? They had but are they the same kind of every major Naval power had from the 20th-century especially in between 1930s and 1940s, huh? What Battleship the Russian had that rival the Iowa, Bismarck, Roma, Yamato and/ or Vanguard ? Name me just one ship that actually floated. So if i want my main nation which is Japan to get more content then i should make up an excuse like, if japan won the war she would definitely has more warships built than what she historically had ? Nice logic. I never said they made them up ? What i'm against is the fact they chose these paper ships as their priority over the historical ones! IF they are smart enough they would add all historical ones first then add paper ones later. And by that time no one can complains about paper ships because all the real ships at least the capital ones would be already added. And while they are existing projects, all other ships i previously suggested are built in steel you tell me which one sounds more significant, but apparently they don't deserve to be mentioned in the game but the ones that never left the drawing board let alone saw any action, do ? Thailand? what about it? has nothing to do with the topic. Stop trying to argue me using what the nationality i have because you took me for the entire nation, oh wait! That is exactly what you falsely said about my opinions in the first sentence of your comment, how ironic. IF Russian navy wasn't known as a battleship builder SO BE IT ! They have the cruisers and destroyers that were actually built, focus on those! It is dumb to give recycled ships like Mutsu and Ashitaka which are stock hull of tech tree ships to Japan, a nation that actually built many battleships get copy paste contents, but the one that only built Dreadnoughts at best, it instead gets powerful brand new BBs made from scratch in just one year! (there are also some more new unreleased russian BBs hidden in the tree btw) , Go figure. I want to play a game where contents are created for all nations equally ! In this case it isn't! The Kii was added back in 2017, 3 years later and there is no new IJN BBs since. Maybe you can tell me why ?
  7. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Battleship Poltava and "Resolute and Rapid" Containers!

    That moment when a nation that never built a single battleship in their entire naval history (i don't count Dreadnoughts as a proper BB) starting to catch up with the big 3 (UK, US & Japan). For real tho another paper battleship ? We don't even have the real warships like IJN Yamashiro, Ise-class battleship or even the Tosa-class battleship which the IJN Kaga belonged to and was later converted into a aircraft carrier. But instead we have this, what even is this? Any history behind this ship umm thank you ? I wonder how significant the history of this ship has, something like ''Stronk battleship designed for the mother land!!! unfortunately it was never built''
  8. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Halloween: Raid for the Filth!

    The sad part of this game, most of the players are 12 years old sadly since it seems like most of them really enjoy fairy tales.
  9. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Halloween: Raid for the Filth!

    Christ, these fantasy craps are too much even for me, please stop !!! I absolutely hate these garbage looking ships. Instead of spending time on real historical ships the developers chose to wasting so much time on this one event is beyond me....
  10. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Pan-Asian Squadron

    Why the Irian on the screenshots from the store she appears with antennas but the actual Irian doesn't has a single one of them ?? Is this a model error or something ? The model also seems different on some other areas.
  11. Yeah bring back ships like Bellfast or Kamikaze cuz there are ''happy paying customers'' who want them ! Who cares they are OP when all that matter is money, screw the balance of the game money all the way woohooo lololol
  12. What ? Nooooooooo !!! I wanted my HSF Harekaze to be a rare ship now we are going to see it more often, wow thank you so much WG
  13. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Use the Recruiting Station – Get Valuable Rewards!

    If only Mutsu is worth getting. #BuffMutsu
  14. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Atago's (lack of) windows

    They actually fixed Atago's windshield now in this new patch. I'm so glad ! Shout out to WG, they don't ignore for small mistakes!
  15. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Dry Dock: Großer Kurfürst

    Wow! I did not expect her model was going to get updated, at least not this quick ! This really shows that WG actually cares for mistake in small details! Thank you so much for giving her the windshield! The details on a ship are very important to me :)
  16. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Update 0.8.9: Italian Cruisers

    Well, i never asked for buffs for the Shimakaze line ?? I asked buff for Hatsuharu and Shiratsuyu ONLY ! Because they are in the same branch as Akizuki so they should be gun focused destroyer and become a gun boat to train the captain for Akizuki-class.
  17. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Update 0.8.9: Italian Cruisers

    I think you are confused. Hatsuharu and Shiratsuyu are not in torpedo boat line which leading to Shimakaze, they are in the ''gun boat line'' which leading to Hargumo. Akizuki is the first ship you can actually call ''powerful'' in this branch. The Hatsuharu and shiratsuyu despite they are in the gun boat branch but their guns are unreliable and they can not train you how to play gun boat before you reach the Akizuki.
  18. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Update 0.8.9: Italian Cruisers

    Seeing the reload buff to Blys. makes me wonder what is the chance for Hatsuharu and Shiratsuyu to get reload buffs aswell ? And maybe just make them a gun boat instead of torpedo boat if it going to be in the same branch as Akizuki-class. Besides i found these two to be the weakest torpedo boats comparing to Fubuki and Akatsuki, i would not mind for torp nerf (if really needed) in exchange for better main gun reload for Hatsuharu and Shiratsuyu. Anyway Type 21 camo is interesting, i hope this camo is permanent and available for all Japanese ships especially above tier 5...
  19. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Ibuki missing a radar. (model)

    It makes sense but i still think she should has her radar modeled because that is how she was originally designed. Besides it's kinda weird how the radar base is still present on top of the foremast without a radar. It is almost like they forgot to model a radar on it. If WG really didn't give Ibuki the type 21 because they thought the radar would be outdated by the time Ibuki is put in service then i can''t think of any explanation to why they gave this radar on other newer ship designs such as super-Akizuki (Kitakaze) and B-65 (Azuma). Regarding the radar on Zao (Yoshino also has it) i do not know but they remind me of the radar found on some American ships. It is possibly a prototype or experimental radar copied from the american because i have heard the Japanese did some copy on captured US radar, can't remember what it was, and ofc i could be completely wrong lul. WG created Zao based on a drawing from a Japanese magazine however in the drawing there is no such radar but i found a model which has this same radar just like the Zao in the game.
  20. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Ibuki, the weakest link of IJN Cruisers?

    No, I love my Ibuki it is a very solid heavy cruiser. It can fire at people from very long range as far as 19 km and you can upgrade it rudder shift time down 3.5 second, yeah it is better than even some destroyers. It will be very difficult for the enemy to hit you because you have the really good firing range combining with destroyer rudder shift time they will never hit you from 15+ km away. Look at the stats.
  21. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Public Test of Update 0.8.9: Round 2

    deleted.
  22. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Public Test of Update 0.8.9: Round 2

    "Infernal" camos are now available for the following ships: So what exactly is this ''infernal camos'' ? I have been wanted the default camo of normal Asashio for my Asashio B but i guess this is not the one ? Talking of Asashio i wonder if it's possible to add a second torpedo option for her, the normal torpedo that can hit all ships for those who don't want to focusing BBs all the time with the deep water torp...
  23. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Number 13 Capital Ship prelimenaries

    Is the Ashitaka one of the No.13 designs ? I
  24. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Dry Dock: Großer Kurfürst

    Great video and all. Just a reminder that there is a super old ship called ''Atago'', she is at least 4 years old in this game and if you look closely to this model you will see she is getting outdated. Starting with the fact that the bridge of Atago has no glass. Hope her model is updated in the future. Just a question but a Japanese ship with only single barrel 25mm guns is unheard of especially for a large warship, so i do like to know what kind of Atago is in this game?
  25. lmperial_Japanese_Navy

    Tirpitz and Asashio are back in action

    I didn't even complained about its AA guns of the Yahagi. The AA power is good so that is not the problem ! The trash stats i'm exactly talking about here belong to the two recent IJN premium, Yudachi and Yahagi. For example the Yudachi, 9 second gun reload when all other IJN DDs has either 7.5 or 5.7 seconds, 57 knots torps speed when all other long lancers have either 60 to 67 knots, the torp detecting range of 1.9 km when all other long lancers have between 1.8 to 1.6 km detecting range! Regarding the Yahagi, the turret rotating slow, bad RoF for only 6 guns, mediocre gun accuracy, bad AP penetration, HE struggling to do full damage when they hit, and unlike other cruisers she doesn't get repair party or smoke to compensate the mostly negative things she has to offer. Yeah sure it has speed boost but why tho? This ship does 35 knots and that is destroyer-like speed so she is not even struggling with her speed. I'd rather have repair party or smoke which would allow her to stay in the fight much longer. This ship is struggling to even deal with DD because of slowly rotating guns and slow RoF plus sometime fully 6 hits on DDs does only 1000+ dmg and AP doesn't want to pen anything. Are you telling me the characteristics of guns in real life are actually being represented in this game ? Then why not all IJN DDs has 10 RPM which is around 5.7 second of reload? Why do they have 9.0, 7.5, 7.0 and 5.7 seconds of reload despite all of them being the same gun? And i highly doubt that all guns in the game are historical accurate consider how WG sometime buff and nerf them too! So why historical specs suddenly became important with the Yahagi ? Besides the firing arc has absolutely nothing to do with how old the gun is, if it has 850 m/s then it doesn't need to aim at high angle like American 127 guns which only has 790 m/s, making no sense! This is simply false. From mid to late war many IJN ships gone through AA upgrade and received a significant number of various 25mm AA guns. Historically the IJN Asashio had 28 x 25 mm A.A., 4 x 13 mm A.A, Asashio in the game has only 2x twin barrel 25mm guns. IJN Atago historically had 2x40mm anti-aircraft, 60x25mm anti-aircraft, 4x13.2mm anti-aircraft, Atago in the game has only 28x of single barrel 25mm guns. And many other ships with the same problem. Not to mention the IJN Yahagi in 1945 she had up to 61x 25mm AA guns. In the game she is not even the same Yahagi that escorted Yamato during operation Ten-Go. No no it is not the WG that decided to give them the worse AA defense possible, not at all -_- It is not only because the ship is well made, model wise but also as i said i have been asked for Agano class or more IJN premium cruisers in general for the longest time and this is the first ship since Atago so i was forced by myself to get it despite WG wanted it to be one of the worst premiums in the store. To make thing clear i'm not here complaining the fact i bought a bad ship despite i already knew how it going to performance. I'm here to tell them to STOP making bad premium ships for Japan and to tell them that the ship needs to be fixed to make it enjoyable! I don't want WG to get away with such terrible decision making when it come to IJN premium. If i don't complain then i don't see anyone else will, and this ship will never be good because WG thinks if no one complains then the ship is fine... I don't even know how Yudachi and Yahagi came out as they are despite being tested by those CCs for more than half a year.
×