RufusShinraSB

Il a toujours été possible d'utiliser des doublons pour grimper au rang 10 aisément, je ne vois pas de problème ou de différence. Peut-être est-ce juste un refus du changement de la part de certains sur le forum ?

Je ne vois pas en quoi il s'agit d'un coup de couteau dans le dos, malgré mes 16000 parties. En outre, lorsque je regarde les statistiques du navire, il semble être bien au-delà de la moyenne dans nombre de paramètres, ce qui semblerait indiquer que le Jean-Kévin moyen soit effectivement une réincarnation de l'amiral Nelson et que je suis content de l'avoir avec moi. Enfin, que diantre, il semblerait que les données des serveurs contredisent une fois de plus les posteurs qui manifestent, il faut bien l'avouer, une certaine tendance à l'hystérie face au changement.

Je pense que c'est bien sympa de permettre à ceux qui ont une vie réelle d'accéder efficacement à un navire de légende avec un skin amusant, sans que ça déséquilibre le jeu avec un P2W vu que le Yamato n'est pas particulièrement OP. L'event attire l'attention sur le jeu et sur la franchise associée sans pour autant forcer cette dernière puisque n'importe qui peut désactiver ces skins dans les batailles elles-mêmes. Le niveau moyen des joueurs ne change pas pour autant par rapport à la norme, et cela permet d'avoir des nouveaux qui resteront là pour un bon moment grâce à l'investissement apporté. Après, comme WG, je n'ai pas trop tendance à prêter attention aux hurlements des Cassandre qui disent depuis cinq ans et quelques que *insérer event ou navire ici* cause la mort du jeu et que c'est affreux. Au contraire, j'espère qu'il y aura plus d'events de ce type !

Moi, je trouve que c'est une super idée et un bon évènement pour les amateurs.

Rainbow Dash est 20 % plus cool qu'Albator. C'est prouvé.

Exactement ! Je veux mon Smolensk Derpy juste pour le troll maximum. Il y a des choses importantes, et le staff de WG doit s'en rendre compte !

Quitte à faire une promo avec Hasbro, j'aurais préféré un event avec Mon Petit Poney. Un Kléber avec camouflage Rainbow Dash, ce serait infiniment plus classe, et j'achèterais sans hésiter (et je suis sérieux).

Moi, je retiens surtout LA boulette du siècle : Le Canadien s'est planté de ligne et a signé à la place de Leclerc, qui a dû lui-même signer à la place du Hollandais, et ainsi de suite, jusqu'au Néo-Zélandais qui a signé en bas de la page.

On s'est fait spammer aussi. @EverettFR a eu un joli échange, d'ailleurs.

I'm a CV main, and after months of suffering from the awful lies spouted by the DD mafia about how they're supposed to be defenceless against us CV players, I've decided to debunk the myth once and for all. Destroyers have extreme anti-air potential against aircrafts of all kind, and any decent destroyer player can easily annihilate even the most advanced aircrafts. But here's the difference between me and the torpedo-spamming monsters who indulge themselves in bullying larger ships: I bring PROOF. The kind of scientific proof that is undisputable, showing once and for all how competent players bully us carriers. I will now accept the apologies of DD main players who realized their conspiracy to hide the truth has been brought to light. And if you come here to claim that you can't do the simple maneuver shown in the proof, then my only answer is to git gud. And just dodge (TM).

En tant que joueur de CV, j'en ai assez des mensonges répétés par la mafia des DD relatifs à la vulnérabilité de leurs navires OP face à mes petits avions régulièrement envoyés à leur mort sans que personne ne pense aux familles des pilotes. Mais ce qui m'énerve le plus, c'est le refus continu de ces joueurs d'accepter qu'un joueur de DD un tout petit peu compétent peut massacrer tout appareil volant avec une facilité écrasante. Et contrairement aux joueurs de DD en question qui envoient des affirmations sans fondement, basées sur leur "expérience" et leurs prétention, moi, je viens clore le débat une fois pour toutes avec une source de valeur scientifique absolue : Voilà, le débat est clos, et j'accepterai ici les excuses des joueurs de DD dont l'effroyable imposture a été mise à jour. P.S. : si vous n'êtes pas assez compétents pour faire ce qui est montré, faut pas se plaindre et faut apprendre à mieux jouer.

*raises an eyebrow* You haven't played Random much, have you? And in any case, this sounds like the DD mafia, complaining as soon as there is the slightest hint of difficulty against them, almost demanding that they should be invulnerable and their enemies stationary targets. See, people? That's why I'm saying CV players are the target of undue oppression and are innocent victims of bloodthirsty, torpedo-toting, aircraft-slaughtering destroyers.

A ship that is even less armed than DD in WoWS, against an aircraft a lot more advanced than any of the ones available on the CV ingame. Any good player should do even better, so if you can't, you only have yourself to blame. QED.

See? What are we CV players supposed to do against this kind of maneuver?! We are the true victims here and it's about time WG acknowledges it and give us a decent compensation package, such as the Puerto Rico and 500 Mega Santa Crates for the moral damage.

Merci ! Je viens d'apprendre comment éditer les GIF, là. Ça rend bien, en plus de dire la vérité absolue et sans exagération aucune.

I saw that Wargaming takes on its own all expenses to post the gifts to their buyers. Does anyone have the phone number of an ISS crew member, I have an amusing idea... :-)

Je ne vais pas m'attarder sur les flame wars du Puerto Rico qui, apparemment, sont plus incendiaires que le gosse d'un Midway et d'un Conqueror. Par contre, le coup des jetons, des boosters et de leur utilisation avec les vitesses variables de construction, c'est compliqué. Et quand quelque chose est compliqué, on sort Excel. Donc voici un chtit fichier utile. Trois onglets : Les Bases, Le Calendrier construction, Le Calendrier jetons Les Bases : les paramètres sur les boosters, dates de disponibilité des directives, valeurs des récompenses, etc. Le Calendrier construction : un gros tableau avec les lignes correspondant aux dates et les colonnes aux boosters. Vous mettez un 1 dans la case correspondant au jour où vous activez un booster spécifique, et ça vous donne le nombre de points de construction par minute, le nombre de points de construction disponibles à la fin de la journée, et le nombre de jetons qu'il vous reste ce jour-là, pour savoir à partir de quand vous pouvez acheter le booster, et planifier l'achat éventuel de boosters premium. Le Calendrier jetons : pareil, sauf que vous mettez des 1 sur les jours où vous récupérez les jetons d'une directive spécifique, des missions quotidiennes, etc., comme ça vous avez le nombre de jetons jour après jour, qui sert pour le Calendrier construction et vous indique si vous allez être en négatif. Comme ça, vous pourrez planifier à l'avance combien de jours prendre pour telle ou telle directive, quels jours d'absence, si un booster premium est utile et quand, etc. @Tanatoy, je te laisse vérifier si mes formules sont correctes. Puerto Rico WoWS FR.xlsx

To illustrate my PR token simulator, here is a strategy I conceived (I'm a numbers nerd, that's why) for a clan member of mine who got 14,000 gold in a Mega Santa Crates package, that allows you to get the Puerto Rico for 46 € and a reasonable grind. AKA, you grind to have a Tier X premium at the cost of a Tier VIII premium. As a disclaimer, I do not intend to follow this strategy myself for the simple reason I already own Stalingrad, Bourgogne, Yoshino and most importantly Hakuryu (I'm a CV main, so I hope the hate and loathing you will all throw at me will collide with the hate and loathing thrown at me for not yelling against the Puerto Rico, leaving me unscathed). So, how to get Puerto Rico without getting yourself hooked to a coffee IV for several weeks? Before Dec, 21st: do all daily missions, get all daily rewards, no mistake. Before Jan, 7th: do all daily missions, get all daily rewards, you are allowed to miss up to 15 tokens. Before Dec, 16th: grab the first two premium boosters (14,000 gold), finish directive 1 (not that hard, seriously), get standard booster 0 (the free one) and standard booster 1. Before Dec, 21th, finish directive 2 to get normal booster 2. (not exact date, but any time earlier than that is good, and if you do it later, you'll need to be faster on directive 3) * Recommendations for directive 2: ** 150 Citadels/Fires/Floodings/Torpedoes: Co-Op, Smolensk and Henri IV being alternated, rush like a French soldier against machine guns in 1914 (don't ban me, I'm French, that's called self-deprecating humour), fire HE like a madman/madwoman, then switch to torpedoes, fire until you die, then switch to the other ship. Honestly, you should get the 150 before too long. ** 135,000 XP for the different ship types. Grind, annoying, use your XP boost flags, camos and daily bonuses. Gonna be a bit annoying, but entirely doable (seriously, a max configuration can get 30,000+ XP per game, though you can reasonably expect 10,000 to 20,000). Focus on a ship type at a time, keep an eye on the total/potential damage counts, maybe you can get one or both of these finished earlier and get out of the grind. Yes, it IS grind, but entirely doable grind within 5 days or so if you're willing to spend a lot of special flags and apply yourself. On Dec, 21st: get normal booster 3 thanks to the daily missions and rewards you got. Now, for the good news: you have almost TWO WEEKS to do directive 3 and you won't have to do any further directive. Before Jan, 3rd: finish directive 3 to get normal booster 4. (if you finish directive 2 earlier than Dec, 21st, you can have more time to finish this, but try to get it done by New Year's Eve to be really sure) * Recommendations for directive 3: ** 130 Citadels/Torpedoes : Midway, with the torpedo bombers in Co-Op against vulnerable targets (if you can div with a couple of friendly Musashi, you'll have a great time) or, for its happy owners, Benham and its legendary torpedo soup. ** 4,500 Secondaries : Jean Bart, Alsace, Bourgogne, République, GK, Massachusetts, Georgia, Ohio, that kind of beast, in full Secondary configuration, in Co-Op. You'll have some really enjoyable and stupid games that will blow a LOT of steam, doing easily 400+ hits a game. Good to get ready for the last part. ** 48,000 base XP with three ship types (that'll automatically finish the 105,000 base XP mission). Again, grind, requiring quite a number of games. Roughly 120 Tier X games to do in around 10 days: 1,200 XP average time 40 for a single mission, time 3 for the whole lot. That means 3-4 hours a day. If you git gud, you can probably go down to 2-3 hours, but that'll be the last run to Puerto Rico. On Jan, 7th: get normal booster 5 thanks to the daily missions and rewards you got. On Jan, 8th: you're bloody well done with WoWS for several weeks. You look at the other directives and don't give a **** about them. Sometime before the event's end: you get a large cruiser that is probably good but that will NEVER be Balancegrad. There you go, this is a grind that is entirely possible and doesn't require superhuman feats. You'll need to play regularly, effectively and to optimize your ship selection to finish the missions. What you'll get will be a decent ship for the monetary cost. Whether you think the PR is worth this grind is up to you. For me, it isn't, but I'll be sure to lob a few AP bombs right into your citadels after my torpedoes break your rudder and engine one time too many. Second disclaimer: if you're interested in this strategy and want to spend the cash on it, check my numbers yourself before you do so, and make sure you'll be able to do the daily missions. Meanwhile, I'll be waiting for the premium of my dreams:

Yes, I love being reported for being a CV, means I do my job well of ruining everyone else's life.

I see, once again, the oppressing majority ignores the unique needs of minorities.

Nah, what's ridiculous is that I cannot have modern anti-ship missiles on my planes, laser-guided bombs and the such (I'm not asking for tactical nuclear weapons, though it would be a good pace towards proper balance). That I cannot have such is just another proof of the outrageous oppression of the CV minority. Help, help! I'm being repressed!

The NTC gave indeed a good opportunity to rediscover the lower ranked ships, and it was a decent experience, though not one I'd do again unless they offered really good ships - I got the Colbert and I love it, and I don't want Ohio, having Georgia already. The whole thing about Rank X ships being used doesn't bother me either, but that might be because I have 20+ of them and like to use them.

Meh, it'll be like usual. As for the ship, it's not garbage, just looks like a Mehbote. Azuma is garbage, not PR. But frankly, nothing like Stalingrad or Yoshino. And THAT is the good thing IMO. Remember the NTC? It was a massive mess and WG walked back on it because it was going to change the entire meta and pretty much force every competitive group to shell over cash to regrind several times the same ship ASAP just to have the same ships as their potential foes. It was pretty bad, the CC said so, and in the end, we got the Research Bureau which is decent and got me the hilarious and unique Colbert. Puerto Rico? Just a big load of Meh. Grind coal instead and get Yoshino or Smolensk for free, it'll be a much better use of your time. This post was brought to you by Meh. Because Meh.

'People can see this.' It's pretty amusing, considering that some of the most successful businesses ever based their entire model over 'people suck at doing complex maths', 'people suck at planning realistically', 'people are overly enthusiastic on their commitment levels over a period of time'. I'm not going to worry over this event for WG, they'll make tons of cash and it won't hurt the gameplay because in the end, Puerto Rico ain't going to change the meta.