El2aZeR

Ist ein Problem mit deiner Verbindung. Die ist anscheinend instabil.

Yes.

No. In fact you likely couldn't pick a worse time to come back tbh.

Yes, because even without CVs and stealth radar a state of "World of DDs" as you put it didn't exist.

You haven't learned anything. Actually understanding CV play will take you to 70% solo WR and up. Just knowing, not even mastering the basics will easily carry you to over 60%. If you perceive CVs to not be overpowered currently then you're either bad at playing them or you're delusional. Neither is needed to keep DDs in check.

Indeed. Tell me, if you cannot hit the broad side of a barn with the most accurate rifle in the world, does that mean the rifle is inaccurate or that you're just a lousy marksman? Because according to this "logic" the rifle is inaccurate. Evaluation based on the skill of incompetents will always fail and as such has no value.

At least there was a period when GZ was decent. Implacable meanwhile came out dead. On a more serious note, it is pretty obvious that GZ, Implac, Audacious, etc. are where WG actually wants CVs to be, hence why they're not buffing them to be competitive options. On the flipside nobody would play CVs if that were the case, so they're not nerfing the current meta CVs either.

Honestly to go below ~35% you actually need to start actively sabotaging your team, but it is possible yes.

Half would be a very optimistic estimate given that a 53% WR already makes a player better than 70% of the playerbase. Because MM is random normal distribution applies. This means eventually the amount of default losses and wins you suffer evens out, leaving the matches that you as an individual could have actually influenced. Or to elaborate, the lowest possible WR achievable in this game is somewhere around 20%, meaning that inevitably regardless of how hard you try to lose you will win 1 in 5 matches. On the flipside the highest possible achievable WR is around 80%, meaning you will inevitably lose 1 in 5 matches. These are the only matches you will win/lose guaranteed, every other match you can influence the outcome of either positively or negatively, thus resulting in a higher or lower WR between 20 and 80%. As long as your sample size is large enough there is practically no luck involved in this. The reason why the tone about the topic is generally condescending is because this has already been discussed to death over the years and is proven both in theory and in practice. Anyone who claims that WR doesn't mean anything and that they have a bad WR because they're unlucky is either ignorant or simply looking to justify their lack of skill.

Actually no, it makes perfect sense in context of abysmal average player skill. As such 55% wouldn't be considered excellent, it would be considered meh.

WR over a large sample size, which the OP has, is an accurate measure of skill. 47% WR is terrible. Simple as that.

Even assuming a fighter build is actually effective, it is still worthless because

That is not how MM works. Just accept it, you're terrible at this game not because you constantly get bad teams but because you're actually just terrible.

The chances of this happening are astronomical. In fact to say that they're astronomical would be an understatement. https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/76406-win-rate-and-luck/

Ich glaube das muss man nicht weiter kommentieren, oder?

What should be done instead is nerfing other CVs to the level of the GZ.

No. While the DPS values and range distribution are quite decent comparatively speaking, Hindenburg AA as with KM cruiser AA in general is anemic due to a general lack of range.

Austin most likely.

Given that we haven't heard anything about Kitakami for a while I would assume they scrapped its reimplementation.

Two attacks with TBs do the trick. As a tester once found out.

If you're dropping Interceptor you've essentially just made your fighters even more useless in air-to-air than before since they get despawned much faster by enemy fighters. Any player that isn't capable of doing that isn't a player worth defending against in the first place. I've played against a number of fighter build CVs without Interceptor so far. They're even more worthless than your usual fighter spamming potatoes.

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/76406-win-rate-and-luck/