El2aZeR

Remember when they removed manual drop from low tier CVs? Remember when us skilled CV players said that it's a horrible ing idea and suggested a million other things they could do instead? Because WG told us straight to the face that they're never going to listen to us on anything. Honestly give us a month or so and we'd have CVs fixed at least in concept. But that's ofc not in WG's interest.

Oh come on. You know that Tetris is way too difficult for the average potato.

You mean "they lose their strike 2x and they're out of bombers"? Yeah, sure seems unlimited to me. Sure, but that has other reasons. Simple fact is that most people simply don't or straight up refuse to take countermeasures against CVs like they would for example against DDs. Having been in CBT you've surely noticed that few ask for air cover or are willing to provide it anymore, no? Playing effectively against a CV is easy even in DDs. Having the intelligence to do so is apparently not. Oh, no. Oh, oh, oh no. Have you... Think about this. Have you ever thought about using DFAA when planes are close to you so you can get them all? And not get baited like a braindead potato? Or have you thought about NOT using DFAA on DBs and using it for TBs? Seriously, the term baiting in itself means that you're trying to make the enemy MISPLAY. If he falls for it, he misplays horribly and deserve to be punished. Use DFAA when planes are within 3km and not a moment sooner unless you want to save an ally. Same for every other class. No example you listed is different. It's a problem, but you don't address it by globally nerfing CVs. You address it by removing or adjusting the mechanics that are causing this disparity in the first place. Currently skilled and potato CVs basically play two entirely different games. Imagine for example if BBs could just set their main guns to fire automatically at reduced efficiency like secondaries. That's basically auto drop. Remove that and CV players will have to git gud or quit, reducing the skill gap. I am not discouraging you to make suggestions. It's just that your suggestions are tied to the current RTS gameplay of CVs, which makes them moot. I thought you'd like to be aware of that.

Excuse me, but here let me fix that for you.

Git gud and aim for the blue line. Border humping ships are incredibly easy to hit.

Risk of losing planes is apparently no risk at all. No it isn't. If one CV player is better and the enemy team is completely braindead, yeah, sure. Not a problem with CVs however. Press T button and watch the entire strike melt within seconds. Already the case. A CV's range is determined by their service times and therefore their damage potential. If you just stay at the edge of the map or in spawn it can easily take you up to 5 minutes (aka a quarter of the match duration) to attack again. Sticking with the fleet thus becomes paramount for both protection and damage potential. The average Joe is also incapable of using WASD. I guess we need to remove citadels (OH WAIT, already done on most BBs) and torpedoes? Balancing around the average player means you're not balancing at all. Yes, CVs are difficult for the average player to grasp, perhaps more so than other classes due to specific peculiarities that WG decided would help them but in reality just screws them over (*cough* auto drop *cough*), but so is everything else. No we can't. Unless you want to make single CVs capable of slaughtering 4 unskilled ones and therefore increase the impact of a skilled CV on a match. Not really, considering it's a complete overhaul. The current prototype makes you pilot squads manually, any changes that rely on the current RTS playstyle therefore become moot.

Considered asking for AA support or fighter cover? Sometimes people are willing to help if you just ask. Also WG should've addressed spawns years ago. That's hardly the fault of CVs.

http://anohito.tw/poi/

你好.

There is no window, it's instant. The problem is that if you go for a direction your fighters aren't facing they're gonna take a while to turn. Check the arrow below your fighters to see which direction they are facing. Also APM spam is not recommended as it slows down your fighters with tiny turns every time. Been using it ever since they introduced strafing out. Works 100% of the time, every time.

Nah, regular graphics designer at another gaming company. I imagine those making camos over at WG are going through the same... lets call them "challenges" as I do tho. Heck, stuff like Iron Crosses on Hipper could've even been in the collab contract.

By the way I totally missed that one xD EDIT: EU page is even more hilarious WG full of weebs confirmed once again.

Yeah, you won't see me defending those. Although I wouldn't necessarily crucify the artist as they usually get guidelines and have to follow them to the T. Put Iron Crosses all over Hipper? Yeah, looks fugly, you try to convince the higher ups that it looks fugly, but they usually remain stubborn and you just have to deal with it. How do I know this? Currently working as one myself. It grinds down rather quick on your mental stability. Still waiting for a screenshot of Enterprise. WG don't you ing dare make my waifu look ugly.

Meh, if I had the doubloons to spare I'd even consider it. But since I have neither Nelson nor doubloons to waste that's problem solved for me. :D

Nelson looks pretty good tbh. Rest tho? Yeah, no thanks. Also Basketball camo? Did I miss something?

Needs the option "Everything".

1. Helena 2. Atlanta 3. My waifu Enterprise 4. Dank Memes Des Moines 5. Fletcher

*cough* Expert Rear Gunner on KGV *cough*

So... is this offer universal or do I not qualify because I'm not female? :P

Use the mute function. That's a pretty good retort imo.

I have just been informed that @Boris_MNE has been banned temporarily. In light of these horrible news that are surely dampening the spirits of the entire forum community, allow me to do the honors.

She's just shifting her rudder. Looks fine to me.

Rudder shift does not characterize turning speed. What is actually relevant is speed of the ship in a turn, drift and the turning circle. Torp protection is a useless stat for damage mitigation as taking a hit to the bow and stern always cuts torpedo damage in half due to damage saturation (unless ofc the torp deals less damage than what is needed to saturate, which would be rather low to say the least). Also taking citadel damage, which a torp hit to the belt would result in, is undesirable with heal. This means that generally speaking you want to take torps on the extremeties to minimize damage (and maximize heal value if you have it). Only take torps on the belt if you want to reduce the chance of flooding. I don't have the Abruzzi and frankly I couldn't care less about her, I'm just here to clarify things.

I summon @Boris_MNE in attack mode!