El2aZeR

And what exactly makes you think we haven't in the 6 months that have passed? NOTHING. HAS. CHANGED.

For s sake... This thread was created half a year ago. No problem was discovered. Nothing about the Missouri guns have changed.

Maybe you'll start complaining when you realize you're actually way worse in reworked CVs than RTS CVs? And it's not like you were doing particularly well with RTS CVs.

Well, I suppose one of the bright sides of the rework is that both CVs are kinda competitively viable now. How to interpret that is ofc up to the individual. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (Although that is a state which has already been achieved previously once. AS Midway actually compared pretty well with AS Haku.)

English forum here. ;) And placing DFAA into the radar slot sounds like a horrible idea to me.

Have to admit, a bit disappointed you did the test without me. That's what I get for having a 2 hour train ride home I suppose. Did you experience what glorious Midway DBs can do against DDs btw? Depending on RNG those things can actually kill DDs at a much faster rate than RTS CVs could. Nothing is more balans when you see a DD eat a 12-15k hit in a single attack, knowing you have 3 more where that came from. Seriously though, I wouldn't be surprised if a competitive composition would actually exclude DDs entirely.

The sheer disadvantage in spotting if a team were to pick none will make a CV mandatory I believe.

Agreement is now intentionally interpreted as the opposite in an attempt to make the other look bad. Toxic behavior at its finest, wouldn't you say? And ofc you have never considered that you're the one in the wrong here. Perhaps it is you intentionally missing me stating that toxic behavior is already being dealt with by CS? Trying very hard to keep this argument alive, then attempting to white knight yourself by taking the supposed moral high ground. Hilarious.

Clearly issues such as AP bombs and overspotting have never been brought up by CV players. Guess what, the harsh truth is unlike the horde of whiners we didn't do 5 threads a day about it because WG was never going to listen to us anyway. We were ignored when we told them that removing manual drop is only gonna widen the skill gap (literally with "You are too experienced to judge." btw) and we were ignored when we told them AP bombs are a horrible mechanic (Q&A shortly after the introduction had a dev tell us that they're satisfied with AP bomb performance) just to name the most blatant instances. CVs are still despised by the majority of players. CVs currently have a population of approx. 4%. Time for another rework then?

Ofc it is. There is no button in real life that instantly cures your depression or makes bullying stop. There is a button to mute a player being toxic in chat. That you even make such a comparison is not only laughable, but straight up insulting to those actually suffering from depression or bullying.

Actually yes, there is a need. Because getting your gameplay disrupted by toxic behavior is YOUR choice due to the existence of the mute function. You get no sympathy from me if you choose not to use it. Also I'm pretty sure it is possible to disable chat without a mod. As for "everyone", seems more like you're looking for shallow reasons to verbally attack, really. Isn't that toxic behavior btw? Oh, the irony. Combating toxic behavior is already being done via Customer Support and punishment is dealt accordingly. More you cannot ask of any developer.

If you feel the need to interpet "everyone" as including the enemy team, sure. Though there will be people who feel no satisfaction with a cheap win caused by sabotage on the opposing team as well. Unsure how that is supposed to sabotage a match. If you feel bothered so much that it affects your gameplay, the mute function exists.

If you choose to see it that way, yes. I did not mean that as an insult or in some condescending way, but it is just the way it is. If you're looking for social justice you will not find it on the internet, especially not on a gaming forum.

Back in the days MK compared very favorably to pre-nerf BFT+AFT 155mm Mogami, a ship that was considered extremely powerful by any standard (and was consequently nerfed hard), after she was buffed. This is primarily why she was considered overpowered especially since she got to keep all her attributes when other cruisers were nerfed with the BFT/AFT changes. Nowadays though I wouldn't say MK is op. Strong yes, but not op.

Have you already forgotten that the great majority of this playerbase can't even WASD?

Or you could just feed fighters to the enemy team. I found that plane kills in general are rather inflated nowadays because of that, especially considering they increased the number of said fighters but heavily decreased their survivability recently. E.g. recently had a Z-23 shoot down 13 planes of my Enterprise. When I took a look in the detailed statistics I found that 10 of those were fighters I left above him for spotting.

I believe with the inclusion of CVs ships without good base AA will die out rather quick tbh. But sure, we'll see.

Probably because everyone is affected equally by someone sabotaging a match, but not everyone will feel bad about another player being toxic.

Amazing idea, but why stop with premium ships? Throw in all other ships as well!

Sure. Will contact you once I'm home. Gonna be some time before that happens tho. If you're not going to be online then I'll see if I can find a substitute and record it. Maybe @Saiyko will be willing.

I'd run out of planes before being able to kill you. As I had to recently experience on the CN server. To even insinuate that any AA cruiser wouldn't win 1vs1 against a RTS CV when handled correctly (barring the use of broken AP bombs) is laughable.

Different rocket pattern? Not like current T4 CVs are particularly different anyway. So.... Langley is OP then? Although if you guys really want something unique, carpet AP bombs?

Except, again, counterplay options have changed, forcing the entire enemy team to loiter in a single location or take casualties. Oh, and while we're at it, island cover also works against you now. Days of an AA ship camping an island and projecting a no fly zone are over. Also ironically reworked CVs still have multi-squad spotting capabilities. They're called fighters and they're literally only good for spotting even after recent buffs.

Rules and sportsmanship mean nothing to you? The moment you decide to play a PvP multiplayer game it is no longer about just yourself. As such the behavior displayed by the player in question is and should be condemn- and punishable.