El2aZeR

Pffff. Yeah right. I guess you probably haven't noticed that multiple people are calling and supporting multiple issues. In general a concentrated effort would only make sense if issues were few. The CV rework is such a dumpster fire of issues that a concentrated effort fundamentally cannot exist. We simply shift from gigantic issues (Haku torp spam, overspotting, AA etc.) to slightly less gigantic ones (tiering, MM, etc.) Oh, it is? That's news to me. For example the fact that I can already reliably strike blobs is hilarious one way or another. And they plan to buff that. There is no solution to this due to the fundamental concept of reworked CV play. Either CVs end up too strong or too weak. There is no acceptable middle ground. And when you have an issue that has no solutions then what you have is broken. Which would be fine I suppose except WG wanted to eliminate such anomalies. And the fact that even fewer players can get close to my level of play, that too can be put on the pile of failures WG set out to resolve. Yes, with reworked CVs if WG wants to balance around the average player that'll mean top players will inevitably overperform. On the other hand if WG tries to neuter top players they'll make the class inaccessible to everyone else. There is no solution to this because of the fundamental gameplay concept. There are no mechanics you can dumb down to bridge that gap without sacrificing the enjoyment of playing the class (at which point it automatically becomes a failure anyway). And remember what I said about problems that have no solutions? Yeah.

To call CVs anywhere near balanced is hilarious. And will continue to be hilarious because the rework is flawed to its core. And really, no one is crying about specific things? Just take a look at the dozens of threads, people are literally complaining about everything specific one way or another. Spotting, damage, AA, MM rulesets, player skill, low tiers, high tiers, nations, premiums, etc. And that too is an inevitability due to the fact stated above. I realize you like the rework but that is no excuse to spout blatant lies. As it stands CVs are going to need at least another half a year of (ultimately futile) adjustments. Compared to that the refund period length is nothing short of a joke.

WG cannot hotfix your incompetence.

I'm very sure Sammy B. would be way overtiered at T5. You're supposed to fight T7s with her? Yeah, good luck with that.

So basically if WG is unwilling to hand out cash refunds, and they certainly aren't willing to (*cough* premium CVs *cough*), it meant no.

Not like a lot of strike planes make it back nowadays anyway.

Sounds pretty final to me.

Hornet with B-25s when?

Be glad. Apparently if I hadn't played E at all she'd be behind Lex and Shokaku in stats. That would've probably resulted in her getting buffed even harder than she actually did.

It was 1,4s to be exact. Yeah, I remember all this stuff.

Yup.

The above example shows you lose a negligible amount of credits when you have done literally nothing worthwhile the entire game with premium. Heck, even -100k without premium is more than tolerable in this scenario. Your example shows perfectly how inflated CV economy currently is.

I am literally earning ~half a million credits per match in high tier CVs. WITHOUT premium. Git gud. If anything high tier CV economy is laughably inflated.

Strongly suggest to increase attack flight size of Furious Level Bombers to two. Having a squad of 4 where only one plane attacks at a time is both silly and incredibly ineffective.

To be fair skill in CVs does not transfer to surface ships. Just like it was previously playing CVs demands an entirely different skillset, as such comparing your ability in a CV vs your ability in surface ships is kinda nonsense. That can technically speaking be applied to all classes ofc, but the divide is largest between CVs and any other class by a significant margin. Doesn't matter if it's RTS or rework. As I stated previously, pretty much nothing has changed.

Yes, Furious should be considered a TB focused CV. Her TBs are excellent. Use them against everything but DDs. Her RFs are pretty good against DDs but suck against everything else due to being very slow. Her bombers are Level Bombers. You basically attack with them like rockets. They're also garbage because having a squad of 4 where you attack only one at a time is stupid and even on a perfect run often yields negligible damage.

WG has already acknowledged in a Q&A that the economy at least in high tiers is far too generous, however they're unsure how to change it without ing off the majority of players. Personally I wouldn't mind a harsher economy.

Considering anyone playing with you (and whoever else you're with) would be automatically handicapping themselves I somehow doubt anyone will take you up on your offer. Instead just upload a bunch of replays and we can easily see whether you're right or wrong. Also scientifically speaking it is extremely improbable to get a good/bad WR just by sheer RNG. You are way, WAY more likely to win the jackpot in a lottery. I'm not joking, someone did the math. So stop trying to hide behind excuses. Give us the replays of your last 10 matches and we will judge accordingly.

They don't even do that, they just straight up disappear. Maybe I'll upload footage of it when I get back home.

Been wondering how long it takes for people to notice tbh which is why I kept quiet. Seems no one really has? If you attack once while you are under attack by fighters the fighters just straight up disappear. In fact as a CV you get the message that the fighters were "shot down".

I guess it's time to Ah, glorious. Images no longer seem to work as well. Nevermind then.

They did actually test missiles, you know? In fact they were as you described, players were supposed to guide them into targets manually.

Sometimes I wonder why I even bother. Not even the ing reverse only bots on the Chinese server (yes, those exist) are as bad as the s populating EU.