Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

El2aZeR

Beta Tester
  • Content Сount

    15,786
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    26801
  • Clan

    [TORAZ]

Everything posted by El2aZeR

  1. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    Read the stats above. Overall stats hardly matter in the face of seasonal ones.
  2. El2aZeR

    Class call system

    *citation needed* In your own calculation if everyone played the same tier with a desirable class distribution etc. we would only get a pathetic 25 full matches for the whole region. A bit of MM tweaking is not going to fix that.
  3. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    Sure doesn't seem like it.
  4. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    Do you even read stats?
  5. El2aZeR

    Class call system

    Which a harsher economy wouldn't. No, I said the game is better off without players who would quit just because they can't constantly sabotage high tier matches. No, because you're still dealing with a player shortage.
  6. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    See guys? I told you Enterprise is totally balans.
  7. El2aZeR

    Arkansas Beta AA

    @MrConway @Crysantos Uhh... You guys might wanna look into this. :D
  8. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    Yeah, it's not like @Culiacan_Mexico has been constantly posting stats to prove your narrative wrong or sth.
  9. El2aZeR

    Class call system

    Even WG admits that they've ed up the economy amd made it far too forgiving. It's not elitist, it is objectively the best and only solution to the current issue. No it doesn't. Because regardless actual player numbers don't change.
  10. El2aZeR

    Class call system

    The fundamental problem is that the playerbase is way too small. Allowing people to queue multiple times does not solve that issue.
  11. El2aZeR

    Class call system

    The last thing this game needs is some kind of system that increases rewards. Again, rewards need to be heavily nerfed, not increased.
  12. Funny, some people seem to do far better than you despite being literally incapable of running any build whatsoever. And again, your top result doesn't matter. Any can get lucky and have a good match once in a while. What matters is consistency and yours is extremely laughable. Hence why average stats matter and once in a blue moon results do not. You're not being accused. You posted evidence of it yourself, as such we don't need to accuse you of anything. Also 2 entirely different matches lumped into one argument. Please, just keep on being more and more dishonest. It's extremely amusing.
  13. Your Musashi average damage is 20k below that.
  14. 10 hits on a yolo'ing low HP DD. Truly compelling evidence. /s
  15. 34 hits and no kills. Build very effective da. Often secure kill on low HP enemy. Does much damage. Very worth investment of tons of points! /s Pro tip: If you're going to lie don't post evidence of it.
  16. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    Not to mention a 50% penalty is laughable at best considering you can easily boost your exp gain to over 10k per match with appropriate measures and having a halfway decent game.
  17. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    To sum the situation up: - WG went ahead and teased that alt attacks (manual drop and fighter strafing) was to be removed from T4-5 CVs - CV mains (who were admittedly few) were outraged by that, pointing out that alpha strike was the problem, not manual drop and that not letting new players learn such mechanics early in a fairly "safe" environment will put them at a severe disadvantage later on -> to put this into perspective the T4 Hosho had the SAME TB alpha strike as a T8 Shokaku. I'm not making this up, in fact here let me show you some screenshots in the CN client: - Fara spoke out against it, dunno about Fem - WG literally told us that we're "too knowledgeable and skilled", as such our feedback will always be disregarded - WG goes ahead with the change - Quality of CV players in higher tiers noticeably plummets as predicted, in fact I can't count the amount of times I got called a cheater when using manual drop or strafing And it's not the only time WG did something like this. Same stuff when AP bombs were introduced, everyone told WG what a horrible mechanic they are so they deemed them as totally fine and balanced. Or the GZ debacle which they only admitted after major community backlash.
  18. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    Nah, what they wanted to do is to get the average potato BBaby to play CVs. You can't do that if you don't assume (and rightfully so) that they're ed. As for RTS CV mains, WG has explicitly stated in the past that they're not listening to anything we give as feedback in regards to CV balancing. No, really, I wish I was making this up.
  19. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    - aircraft flooding chance is low - DDs rarely get the chance to torp a CV, if they do CV either dodges completely, has auto DCP ready/active or dies to alpha strike - Flooding got nerfed hard Gee, I wonder why? Flooding is a negligible threat to a CV, making it 30 seconds or 90 doesn't really change much as you're rather unlikely to get a full flooding on a CV anyway. CVs are getting shot at, bombed and rocketed way more often. Basically "the average playerbase is too stupid for it". They later changed the wording of it and said that it was a translation error or sth but hah, who are they kidding?
  20. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    Then I guess all other classes would have no issues with auto DCP either? Look, I get your desire to make CV hulls more punishable. However as long as WG holds on to their belief that "lol no manual control over CV hull is fine" that can't happen. Why? Because it is, ironically, unfair. Do you believe it would be fair that, say, a BB would like to save his DCP for the inevitable second fire but can't because of glorious auto DCP? The very idea of making CV hulls uncontrollable while using aircraft is inherently flawed like many aspects of the rework. As long as it exists DoT must not apply any serious damage as players have no control over it. Now you may argue that a CV shouldn't come under fire in the first place, but that ties into my original point. WG wants to make CV play as braindead as possible. Anything that makes CV hulls more vulnerable makes braindead CV players more vulnerable. WG doesn't want that. It's the entire philosophy behind reworked CV play.
  21. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    in RTS we could control the hull, including DCP. Longer fires would mean much more damage taken because of a bull mechanic that you have no control over. Do you see the issue here? Besides, it's also to discourage CV sniping which is something else that WG doesn't like.
  22. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    I am well aware. The reason remains the same. WG literally said that they can't expect players to handle both the hull and their aircraft at the same time. And trusting the auto DCP would be bull. So WG had to make the CV hull as proof as possible. This naturally includes cutting fires down to 5 seconds.
  23. During her final voyage Yamato probably shot down more planes by exploding than with her AA guns. Yet for some reason she has pretty good AA in this game. Realism is not relevant.
  24. El2aZeR

    CV Rework Discussion

    WG does not cater to players who have the capacity to think. WG caters to the braindead masses. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
×