El2aZeR

Can confirm. Personally I think it's annoying af.

Ofc not, hence why it is abuse of the chat system and not regular use. Not my problem that WG allows it. Too much of a hassle and I still need chat to insult or make fun of others. Just ruining their match via CV is not enough after all.

Monarch and Lion are now both vulnerable to Enterprise AP bombs. Citadels aren't reliable however. Conqueror citadel can now be hit by Haku AP DBs. You need to drop from the highest possible altitude however which can lead to potential accuracy issues.

Was gonna do a comparison but my CN client isn't working for whatever reason. Currently reinstalling but that might take awhile. Still, in a quick training room test Enterprise killed 3 (stock) NCs in 5 mins with TBs only. Typically an RTS CV would need 3-4 minutes to "reload" a full strike assuming fighters don't need servicing as well, so I'm gonna assume RTS Enterprise won't be faster.

Depending on the circumstances, yes. Being on the throwing team is enough.

Because he's a teammember who threw the match?

I thought I made my disdain of the playerbase and it being the primary driving force of why I still play abundantly clear. Same with me being dead serious about it.

Flying a single squad 3 times is still faster than sending out 3 squads, striking 3 different targets with assumed effective results, having those 3 squads fly back, land, get serviced, launched and be in a position to attack again. Aka being in a position to fly a 4th strike after using 3 to kill 3 ships in a reworked CV is still way faster than doing the same with a RTS CV.

Ever been chatbanned just because you're playing a certain class? Because I have. Very often in fact. As for actual insults, I found that most of the time they actually have a point. Something like "get *insert illness here* camping *insert insult here*" is more likely to elicit agreement from me rather than a report.

Yeah, no. Reworked CVs still kill ships plenty fast. You probably just don't feel like it because damage is spread out over time instead of being delivered in a single strike. Matches that can't be carried in a reworked CV can't be carried by a RTS one either. There are however situations in which a reworked CV can carry where a RTS one can't. These usually involve decapping as a reworked CV can practically decap even multiple ships indefinitely. Quite frankly the stuff you're writing here reeks of complete and utter inexperience with RTS CVs.

Then it just sucks to be them. A throw isn't a "gg". A throw is the result of tremendous stupidity on part of the team. Saying "gg" when your team has thrown is in my eyes an outright insult. And since WG allows me to abuse an automated system that does nothing but promote toxicity, you can bet your aft I will abuse it.

Which. Is. Irrelevant. As long as garbage players pollute high tiers with their existence I will simply abuse the genius automated chat report system regardless of what has been said.

Again irrelevant. A throw implies a winnable situation.

Which is irrelevant if my team was simply not intelligent enough to secure a win from a favorable position, instead choosing to throw. At that point it doesn't matter what my teammate says.

- stop players like Milan from sabotaging high tier matches

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )

if e.g. my team has thrown hard and one of my teammates says "gg", sure.

Enterprise is a perfectly balans ship. There is absolutely nothing wrong with her.

Very slow start tbh (it took entire seasons to get the plot moving), but later on gets real really fast. Animation quality has noticeably declined since Monty died, but imo the story makes up for it. Do you ever wonder why we're here?

I just fling "misbehavior in chat" reports on everyone that displeases me. And because of glorious karma I have plenty of them. Just typing "have fun" or "gg" can be enough depending on what I see on my MMM or how the match played out.

Definitely. Don't forget you get a couple more reserve planes as well.

Actually AP bombs can score pens on DDs as proven by @Sunleader. Quite funny when you think about it. Go to the training room and drop from high altitude (aka precisely the moment your reticle becomes fully accurate) on a Kremlin. Kremlin deck armor is surprisingly weak, E has just enough pen to make it through if you drop high. This is why Haku actually can score overpens on the Kremlin if you drop from too high.

Wat no. Lower HP targets tremendously favors reworked CVs as they can kill them in quick succession. With RTS CVs unless you can kill them with one squad each, which is an unlikely prospect considering AA and evasive maneuvers, at least one is guaranteed to survive. Speed nerf is honestly not as dramatic as many make it out to be. To me personally it feels like reworked CVs still retain higher damage potential. Also reworked CV torps are still pretty deadly. Some of them are just difficult to handle.

On the contrary reworked CVs are either faster or require the same time in killing a target. This is because DPM of reworked CVs is much higher than their predecessors. Put a reworked CV into a pre-rework situation (aka little to no AA opposition) and it will heavily outperform an RTS one in damage dealing. Or at least it used to be that way until the plane speed nerf. Haven't made a comparison since then. Rest assured tho that the previously shown strike would've been outright impossible with an RTS CV.