El2aZeR

Nobody denies that RTS CVs had a ton of issues (or at least nobody with half a brain). But the thing about reworked CVs is that they have the very same problems with new ones added on top. Reworked CVs are not far less powerful, they are depending on the situation either more or even with their RTS counterparts. As such the RTS iteration, despite being heavily flawed, is objectively the superior system for all parties involved.

I have no doubt that as soon as they see it does nothing that it'll get buffed.

Only one time so far tbh. Not that I want to imply that such an option is bad tho. I welcome it.

This is mute. The other disables chat completely. Also not sure what's so bad about hearing chat commands tbh.

Well, they implemented the option in the settings, but afaik you could just do it ingame for quite some time. You know, via

I won't. However you asked for an explanation as to why and I gave it. Uhh... Hasn't that actually been in the game for a while?

What I meant is that it hasn't dropped as much compared to the previous week, meaning that it has already been abysmal for a while. With the statement you quoted I meant compared to the beginning of the rework. Population data is freely available. Feel free to fact check yourself if you like.

Alrighty then. Here's the deal: Chat toxicity is your only viable offensive option against toxic gameplay. WG doesn't care about toxic gameplay because WG makes money off of that. Being toxic in chat usually has the following outcomes: 1. No response. Still good tho, you get to blow off steam. 2. Player gets offended. Good, you've just ruined his gameplay experience. Might even lead him to quit the game which personally is a positive outcome. One player less that ruins matches with toxic gameplay. 3. Player actually sees that he has done ed and tries to improve. Ironically I've had FAR more success with this being toxic rather than being nice. No, really, I'm being serious. Players actually cited toxicity as the reason why they sought out advice, so even in this regard it is more effective funnily enough. As such being toxic ONLY has positive outcomes. It is literally a win-win scenario every single time. Being nice meanwhile will far more often result in toxicity against you and thus has caveats with no positive effects whatsoever. I tried being nice. It simply doesn't work. If you want to combat chat toxicity you have to combat it at the root. Too bad that will never happen because WG is monetizing the out of it.

https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/public-test/bulletin-087/#game-mechanics So basically never fly around with full squads and you'll be fine lol. It is actually really hilarious how WG is dismantling the fundamentals of the rework.

Just censor them using MS Paint if you feel like showing them violates something. What matters is damage distribution. Economy in WoWs is calculated by percentage of damage dealt, not overall damage. Thus dealing 10k damage to a DD, which would be equivalent to ~50% of its total HP, is much more rewarding than dealing 10k damage to a BB, which would only be about 10%. A kill is roughly equivalent to 30% HP damage and a full solo cap 50% if I remember correctly. All other actions such as tanking and scouting are practically not rewarded.

Do us a favor, show us the detailed tab.

The original question by OP was why toxic language isn't automatically forwarded to supposed ingame chat moderators. To which I answered that there are no ingame chat moderators. I didn't imply that there are no chat modifications.

While it is true that you are able to disable chat, I fail to see how that has something to do with there being no chat moderators.

No, however in general design terms a loss is not meant to be enjoyable and neither is getting your aircraft destroyed. Likewise a surface ship is not meant to enjoy getting hit by aircraft. As such fun is a completely irrelevant factor. If you do not have fun while playing CVs, that's fine. Demanding them to be changed on that basis however can and should be contested as balance is paramount, not fun. Due to the inherent role distribution among classes it doesn't matter if every match is different. And yes, pure average damage overall is actually a completely worthless metric for balancing or measuring impact on the match. Just because a Grozo cannot be killed in 2 minutes, which I never claimed anyway, doesn't mean Grozo is not an easy target to take down nor an effective AA platform.

As is evidenced by your mistaken beliefs and all. And what's your point? Getting 300k damage on BBs, while not completely worthless, is however generally more worthless than getting 100k on DDs. No its fine, but if you do not strive to do your utmost to win then why should you be enabled to do just as well as someone who does? Or in other words, why should you be allowed to succeed in CVs if you refuse to adapt and git gud?

No, I'm just telling you on what principles PvP games are designed on. And apparently you're having plenty of fun getting your teeth kicked in in surface ships, why not just apply that to CVs too? Not useless, just more useless than dealing 100k damage to DDs. The rest of the match typically doesn't last all that long when the enemy loses the ability to contest caps or effectively combat my own DDs. In the remaining time I will typically seek out priority targets and no, often that doesn't mean attacking enemy BBs which are usually camping in the back being worthless.

Except that is not opinion, that is fact. Interaction is supposed to be fun, being interacted with is not. As such balance and skill are the most premier factors, not fun. Deal with it. Yeah, no, apparently you don't. As previously explained 300k damage on BBs is far more insignificant than 100k damage on DDs, as such no, I do not strive to inflate my average damage by being worthless.

There are no chat mods. The report system is automated and based solely on quantity.

No. This is a PvP game, it is inherently designed so that you ruin the fun of others. You do realize skill distribution plays a role as well, right? Oh no wait, you probably don't. Yup. 2-3 squads along with a strike of HE DBs is likely enough if the Grozo is skilled in a Midway e.g.

Please, go prove how well you do in those ships. So what? Since you all play for fun it's fine if you just constantly fail, no? Yes, it means nothing. If you had actually paid attention on these forums you would know that WG balances around delta (aka effective) damage, not overall damage. I can also kill him with Haku, Audacious and Midway.

No, it is balanced. Because potatoes shouldn't be able to achieve anything just like in every other class. Also higher average damage means absolutely nothing as previously explained. It does not even make you a good player. Except you can as previously explained. Even if said Grozo is a SU, it literally doesn't matter.

Seems to be a 404 sadly.

While indeed a ing hilarious thought fact remains that most low/mediocre AA targets can still be demolished. In fact AP DBs can now easily attack targets that were previously immune to them (although most of them are BBs so there is little love lost). And its not like the rework iteration alpha strike is insubstantial either, so overall they aren't necessarily worse than their RTS counterparts. No one (or at least no one with half a brain) denies that RTS AP DBs were broken however and if a rollback to the RTS iteration is ever considered removing them should be the very first priority.

You seem to forget that AP bombs still exist with far fewer counters and a way higher RoF than before.