El2aZeR

That's a potato move tho.

Interestingly enough maplesyrup shows a slight decline in CV numbers compared to last week. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Isn't that because stock Haku uses, well, the A7Ms as DBs? Still, nicely done! Maybe this'll get me to play with Haku more ofte- *gets owarida'd*

The movie Midway (2019) as seen by WoWs players: Source

I have a feeling that the entire queue display is broken anyway given that I'm currently seeing over 70 players in queue yet MM can't find a match.

"Nope.™" - WG

This is some extreme level of necromancy right here.

Well thankfully that can't happen to you with reworked CVs since your response time is pretty much instant, meaning you can deny a cap pretty much indefinitely. So there's that.

Just get a few more kills. It's not that hard.

That was quite a long time ago but yes, fires have been heavily nerfed.

Except, ironically, he can also win the game by keeping you specifically occupied. Or you may lose regardless, making your game experience worse than it already is. And he can launch strike after strike without any repercussions which is quite frankly the definition of toxic gameplay.

Worcester has over 200 more AA DPS. Not that it helps her much against skilled CVs but the difference is there. Smolensk is a far easier snack to feast on.

While perhaps true, getting attacked constantly by a braindead CV player is no less frustrating regardless of the results as it inevitably affects your positioning and ability to play. Sure you may win the match by allowing your teammates to go unharassed, but it also outright prevents you from carrying if it becomes necessary. And the CV player certainly isn't getting punished for failing strike after strike.

While perhaps untrue, the point it makes, namely that CVs are inevitably still one of the, if not the most effective BB countermeasure, still stands. The issue is ofc that everything that is strong against BBs ends up even stronger against everything else precisely because BBs have been pandered to time and time again as has been stated before in this thread. Sole exception being Asashio. The more braindead to play BBs become, the more extreme their counters need to be. And BBs have become very braindead to play. Given the history of this game the pandering to this one class by WG is undeniable and perhaps not the sole, but at least a very big reason why the game is in such a sorry state.

Considering the CV rework is almost universally acknowledged as a gigantic BB buff among skilled players, making them by far the most durable and AA heavy targets, you're kinda making our point here? I mean, there used to be a time when the "filthy cruiser peasantry" were the absolute no fly zones of the game while only select few BBs were inherently dangerous to strike. Can't have that ofc.

Sounds about right tbh.

Oh boi, for a second there I thought you meant something entirely different. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) PR2 is an independent pool from PR1, so no, you won't need to research all of the PR1s first.

Here's the fun part: Yes, apparently there are active chat moderators ingame (I don't think I'm allowed to state my source but it is a highly reliable one). Any 3+ day ban is likely attributed to them. 1 day bans meanwhile are automated and via reports. And afaik if you were 3+ days banned once you'll be put on a watchlist so it becomes more likely to get banned again. However anything that can be taken as an insult WILL be taken as an insult. This makes the whole system kinda moot. I think @ForlornSailor once tried to appeal his chatban and it turned out he was banned for calling his team "little girls" as they were camping or sth along those lines.

"Cossack is a great choice against CVs!" "CV - DD interaction is fine." lol

Except that is exactly the issue. The rework prides itself on visuals and little else. Besides, even if you were to just swap models it wouldn't take too long for some people to riot and go "omg why is this plane so ugly?!", eventually forcing you to make up a new model regardless.

Here's how the Hellcats look like in RTS: Here's the rework ones: You should notice some differences to say the least. Should be especially noticeable on the landing gear and engine cowling. RTS and rework models are incompatible with each other. Does "CVs will never be removed" ring a bell? How about following your own advice on this matter?

30 minutes spent on that is still 30 minutes lost for literally no potential revenue. In fact you'd be cutting into your own revenue due to the removal of stock planes. And in case of the Ju-87, that's modeling and texturing an entirely new model for, again, no potential income. "Ju-87 fanboys" will have already bought the GZ because either they bought it pre-rework or are wehraboos in general and as such will buy the GZ for entirely different reasons as well. Even netting only 10 purchases due to that sole reason is far too much to expect, especially in context of both CV and overall player population.

Nothing has changed. Colorado was never particularly accurate to begin with all throughout her history in this game. In fact last I remember her dispersion is almost as bad as on KM BBs, only having better sigma.

And again I question why one should bother complaining about those anyway? The rework in itself requires you to throw logic completely out of the window, thus instead of complaining about the planes not making sense one should perhaps be excited and grateful that you can play with planes that never could've flown off of the deck of a carrier? This kind of "fun first" approach is after all something players like you have preached during the entirety of the rework, so why not just apply it to this aspect as well? Besides, even if it were an issue, investing time and money to fix it, regardless of how minuscule the effort would be, is time and money down the drain given the population and thus potential revenue of CVs.