El2aZeR

Meanwhile in the more balans part of the game... Also can't rename Bismarck to "Bismarck" on AL CN because apparently "Bism" is a banned word.

Except she's a terrible CV player and all articles from her on both AA and the rework is long outdated. So if you recognize anything at this point, I have very bad news for you. So according to your own standards the current reality is: Top tier AA doesn't exist. Good AA doesn't exist. Average AA is where most "AA" ships fall into. And everyone else falls into poor AA. No, Friesland does not sit in the "good" AA category. The AA is mediocre even against lower tier CVs.

So that means CVs are even MORE op since they can actually beat a Massa?

Wait, I thought CVs are perfectly balanced and in no way overpowered according to you?

Nah, I would have won with old auto pilot. It is actually unreal how much worse it is now.

Lost one due to auto pilot. T_T

Resistance to fires is the same across all ships on the same tier except CVs. The higher tier the ship, the more resistant it is to fires. As such Musashi is one of the most fire resistant ships in the game by virtue of being T9.

When did you return btw? I feel like I haven't seen you around in ages!

While it is indeed absurd, it is in fact required so that the CV doesn't suffer from auto DCP as otherwise sniping would be too easy. And since losing your CV can easily mean losing the match increasing the fire duration doesn't exactly solve much.

Except that is again the wrong conclusion and as such a lie. The actual conclusion would be that most CV players are incompetent. Which then leads to the conclusion that there is in fact no counterplay to CVs beyond praying that they're incompetent.

Already doesn't work unless the enemy CV is incompetent. AA DPS is far too weak even in a Kidd which has the equivalence of T6 AA. By the time you reach the cap your HP is already low. All the CV needs to do is wait out your smoke. In fact they can even try to contest because you will die faster than you can torp him. You've still yet to demonstrate a way to win against a CV that doesn't rely on them being incompetent.

So far I found the most dangerous thing to a CV right now is... *drumroll*

- AA nerf to ship which already has pathetic AA Are you guys serious?

Except this undoubtedly proves that CVs have no counterplay in a direct 1vs1 situation unlike what some others claim. Sure makes you wonder what other things such people are willing to lie about.

No ship is, hence why it is irrelevant.

Oh, don't worry. I'm waiting too.

Except, you know, most surface ships don't even get to shoot or even see me a single time before they die no matter how skilled they are. Whether you win against a CV in a surface ship is solely determined by the skill of the CV player, not by build, "strategy" or choice of ship.

Fify. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This is funny because this guy MAY OR MAY NOT BE the same dude as I posted above. You might wanna censor the name tho because naming and shaming.

And here comes the salt.

Fastest kill so far. Fantasque just under 2 mins. Have yet to lose a match.

Well, there are people who can't even manage 10k avg damage in Belfast, so yeah, obviously it IS possible. Just requires your enemy to be incompetent. Also your screenshot above seems broken.

Run away in the opposite direction while spamming rockets. It takes ages for even multiple DDs to kill you with guns alone. Becomes a bit more problematic when they are coming in from multiple directions as you're then in danger of eating a full torp salvo but that is not only extremely improbable but you can manage it by prioritizing targets.