El2aZeR

What is even AA lul?

246,71€ for 75k doubloons. 213,82€ for 65k.

I'd also pan either management or coders for their unwillingness or inability to fix the incredible amount of bugs still left in the game. Seriously, CN server on 0.7.3 isn't nearly as buggy as the current one.

Und wieder, es war damals schon kein Argument um RTS beizubehalten. Es ist es daher jetzt auch nicht. Was den rework ohnehin kaputt macht, denn das fundamentale Konzept funktioniert nur wenn es keine Gegenmaßnahmen gibt. Das hat, wieder, 0.8.5 schon bewiesen. Und nein, die 0.8.5 AA war nicht zu stark. Sie war sogar fast angemessen. Und nein, Slingshot kann nicht entfernt werden, denn es ist eine Lösung für ein viel größeres Problem was im TST sich herausgestellt hat, nämlich eine viel zu hohe Kadenz der Angriffe. Mal ganz abgesehen davon, dass du dich komplett in Widersprüchen verstrickst. Zuerst meinst du, dass die Anzahl der CV Spieler sowieso schon zugrunde geht. Dann willst du diese noch weiter runtersetzen indem du CV play sowohl für potatoes als auch für gute Spieler schwieriger und vor allem langweiliger machst. Du glaubst z.B. ernsthaft irgendjemand würde CV spielen, wenn man die hälfte der Zeit praktisch afk gehen kann während sich die Squads wieder einsatzbereit werden? Das 1 squad direct control gameplay funktioniert nunmal nicht, wenn sich die feindlichen Schiffe wirklich zu wehr setzen können. Dies ging im RTS weil RTS mehrere squads hatte und durch multimanagement über air denial, scouting und striking mehr zu tun hatte als nur damage farmen. Im Rework hat der CV nur eine Aufgabe, nämlich damage farmen. Wenn der CV das nicht frei machen kann dann fällt der Rework in sich zusammen.

If you want to keep something spotted just drop a fighter. Otherwise you're just falling behind in the damage race that is CV play.

Murders the rework in population and is as such not feasible.

Didn't you? If not, then why contradict my point at all since it is apparently the same as yours? Guess what, the rework on its fundamental game design principles doesn't work if CVs aren't omnipotent.

One of these days people will realize that the strength of a ship is just one rather small aspect in the popularity of a ship.

You just claimed that E TBs aren't balanced. Which was my point. Before that you claimed that a concept with marginally fewer reserves but faster regen would be balanced. Which would be a contradiction to your statement above. Also no, player skill is the one aspect that doesn't matter at all for balancing.

And now you've proven my point. Good job.

Because rockets are the only plane type with fast regen on Enterprise amirite? At least try to dismiss an argument on a scientific basis.

Because clearly Enterprise doesn't demonstrate that this is totally broken or sth.

Which would be a balancing disaster.

You do realize that those were disassembled, right?

You do realize that this competition can easily be cheesed, right? You know, since: Also coop bots aren't exactly known for their flak dodging ability.

How about neither? Shinano was a terrible ship and while total reserves aren't as big of an issue as they used to be in RTS (due to CVs being full strike and able to print planes), hull characteristics are still problematic. Not to mention I'd rather not have another balancing disaster on my hands. Yashima is simply unneeded.

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/topic/115415-some-more-cv-stuff/ Here you go.

Well, this was once a thing: Looks like bad photoshop but is actually legit.

This is untrue. Low tier CVs used to be immensely unpopular. It was only after they buffed Langley and Hosho to be seal clubbing machines that their numbers exploded. Thus the logical conclusion is that low tiers is kept alive by seal clubbing and nothing else.

More like greed. Because all of these ships are essentially asset flips meant to rake in cash for the minimum possible amount of effort.

Well, they are actually in the game. After all the CV rework evolved from the missiles they tested. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Those are German guns. And a US Mk37 GFCS on top. That should tell you everything.