Darth_Glorious

And this is Yamato citadel

Nope, Montana citadel is much more vulnerable

I told you, their citadels are well hidden underwater....

I rarely get citadel hits with Texas 14 inches gun so i don't think that is a problem... You aim to get normal pen hits as much as as possible, not citadel hits...

There are spots under turrets 2 and 3 are not protected to citadel hits even as close range...But you still need a lot of RNG to do that because those spots are small. They can be applied to FdG and GK.

In close range you aim a little higher above the waterline to the maximum possible of normal pen hits (50% max dmg) Or you keep the distance (12-15 km) to put plunging fire on the deck. Sometimes you can get citadel hits with it.

It is too good for a tier 5....

RN CL stats are already available on http://gamemodels3d.com They are the same as the leaked infos few days ago so I don't want to repost it.

I totally do not understand anyone who thinks that Kaiser, Dunkerque and Gneisenau are bad ships.

If you want a challenge than you can try....This ship is very hard mode...

WG logic, sometimes we cannot understand them....

According to what I gather from Chinese forums : - FDG has turtle-back armour but its thickness is 30 mm less than Tirpitz one. - GK doesn't have turtle-back armour but its citadel is well hidden underwater and covered with strong armour . You have something like a Colorado which does not have turtleback armour either but still resists to citadel hits at close range. For comparaison, the case of Colorado you have 25 mm (outerlayer) + 318 mm (underwater belt)+ 85 mm (citadel armour)...

Because it is too OP. I think that they have to rebalance it or release it in some sort of expensive limited edition bundle...

British CL stats : Black Swan I : http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9778927 Weymouth II : http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9779961 Celedon III : http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9779979 Danea IV : http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9777284 Emerald V :http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9776802 Leander VI : http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9776721 Fiji VII : http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9776801 Edinburg VIII : http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9780815 Neptune IX : http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9776732 Minotaur X : Tier 7 premium Belfast : http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9779998&_ff=441

Leningrad stats : Tier 7 HP : 15200 Armour : 16 mm Max speed 43 kt. Turning radius : 690 m Rudder shift time : 3,7s 130mm/50 B-13-II (5 x 1) Max gun range : 11,6 km Max dispersion : 102 m ROF : 12 RPM Gun traverse : 27,7 s / 180 degrees HE 46Dmg：1600，Velocity：870 m/s，Fire chance：8 %SAP 46Dmg：2500，Velocity：870 m/s Detectability by sea : 7,6 km Detectability by air : 4,3 km Using Udaloi torps (2 x 4, 8 km range , 60 kt, 15100 dmg, detection range 1,2 km) AA : 76mm 81-K (1 x 2)DPS = 3，3.5 km37mm Flakzwilling 30 (1 x 2) DPS = 3，3.5 km37mm 70-K (4-1)DPS = 23，3.2 km76mm 34-K(2 x 1)DPS = 4，3 km12.7mm DshK (4 x 1)DPS = 14，1.2 km http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=9776855&rand=713

All British CL infos are on : http://wows.duowan.com/1608/335704757403_2.html

All British CL infos are on : http://wows.duowan.com/1608/335704757403.html

Non, non, non il n'est pas le Minotaur 1943. C'est le Minotaur Z2A, un projet proposé en 1946....

Non, 768 m/s est historique http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNBR_6-50_mkN5.htm

Their turret armour is still weak, so they just need more shells to go down....

GK and FdG take a lot of normal dmg pen when showing broadside. If they are angled, it is better to shoot their weak turrets or switch to HE...

Minotaur X full specs : Bonus :

Yes, it is tier 7. Belfast doesn't have torps....

I don't know....Originally, the chinese said a sigma value of 1.7, but after some time, they said that it is buffed to 1.8...