Jump to content

hallomann32

Beta Tester
  • Content Сount

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    2649

About hallomann32

  • Rank
    Able Seaman
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

44 profile views
  1. hallomann32

    Vanguard: lacking something to be good

    german but k
  2. hallomann32

    Vanguard: lacking something to be good

    i dont see how that makes any sense....
  3. hallomann32

    Vanguard: lacking something to be good

    i would use it, some ppl might say you dont need to but its preference rly. Maintopic: I think the Vanguard is overall a very good T8 premium and capable of sustaining itself in T10 reasonably well. The only thing i wish was that she would get the "normal" british citadel and not the abomination of one she got now. To the point of "you have to over angle with her for bearing all guns" yes you do that is true but its somewhat compensated by the cruiser like rudder shift.
  4. hallomann32

    Developer Bulletin 0.7.11 - Discussion Thread

    this whole thread is basicly all about the AP changes...you commented on that on page 2 multiple times...and posted somethign about AP when arguing with Cammo.... idk what you smoked but i would like some of that pls
  5. hallomann32

    Developer Bulletin 0.7.11 - Discussion Thread

    you are in the same thread as me tho right ?
  6. hallomann32

    Developer Bulletin 0.7.11 - Discussion Thread

    its not about switching from AP to HE its all about that the new AP mechanic is broken to the core. You can now damage BBs by shooting their Torpedo belt and bouncing/shatterign on their actual armor (as demonstrated by Flamu) Because most of the DD shills argue "its just realistic that AP does no damage to DDs it wouldnt set of the Fuze anyway" "The Mark 21 Base Detonating Fuze (BDF) had a delay of 0.033 seconds. Fuze activation required a resistance equal to 1.5 inches (3.8 cm) of armor at 0 degrees obliquity or 0.375 inches (1 cm) at 65 degrees obliquity." if you wanna look that up i leave you guys the link http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_16-50_mk7.php so if a DD drives towards you head on....that thing is toast....
  7. hallomann32

    Developer Bulletin 0.7.11 - Discussion Thread

    oof m8 sorry to tell you but you just lost it
  8. hallomann32

    Developer Bulletin 0.7.11 - Discussion Thread

    @FoxtrotOscar_ then lets give DDs back citadels 1st. the "Fleet composition" which is i think the point you wanted to go with is somewhat represented ingame already 2nd no Detectability means you can spot a DD from 14km+.....FeelsGoodMan, you spoke about accuracy but disregard it for DDs GG my boi 3rd again disregarding accuracy again GG my boialso if you are at it why not give DDs back its citadel ?
  9. hallomann32

    Entwickler-Newsletter 0.7.11 - Diskussionsthread

    Werden wir eigentlich im 7.11 test die Möglichkeit haben die HMS Vanguard zu testen im Artikel steht dazu zwar nichts aber würde mich mal interessieren. zum Thema BBs vs DDs: Ich bin ein BB/Kreuzer Fahrer und finde die Behebung dieses Fehlers sehr gut, ABER wie es gemacht wird ist typisch WG und absoluter Müll.
  10. Es ist absolut inakzeptabel das dieser bug nach einer Woche immernoch nicht behoben ist.....
×