Mr_Burke

The technical details looks good. Does any of those ships beats the Cleveland in pure AA power or just equals it out? Just thought if anyone knew it right off hand.

Can't wait to see, if Cleveland will get some rough AA competition from the german line and other upcoming nations. We need more good alternatives than just the Cleveland alone, when we are talking about (and including) tier 6 and all the way below. if we didnt had the Cleveland's AA, carriers would have it WAY too easy all the way up to tier 7.

I hope it's only on a trial. But on the other hand, if WG would for once communicate with the playerbase what features they want to see (like a sticky topic and then ideas will get discussed back and forward) Then this nonsense wouldn't happen in the first place. WG should create a sticky topic, asking for feedback. Then us playerbase can reply in that topic with ideas. And it can be discussed with the WG staff creator. And once the ideas that gets approved, will be taking forward to the rest of the WG staff. But who am I kidding? I don't think WG has enough staff to do that. And there is a big chance they wont see my reply here either

I only got 591 matches. But I got the Pensacola. But for myself about the game: I havent got tired of it yet. But I would still like to see more content (like high waves sea storm) I stopped grinding when I reached Pensacola, because I have gotten bored of grinding. Also I dont have any premium account or premium ships, so getting credits and stuff takes a little bit extra time. Also with my studies and all IRL stuff, I can't play so much anymore. Which makes the grinding even further disliked for me. If the game continues in the same pattern for the next two months, then I might get bored. So I will vote "no" for now. And come back and rejudge my vote within the next two monts.

How many matches do I need under the hood, before my voting would get called legit?

The real question is for the people that suffer from lag in this game here, is if it ONLY happens in this game. And not all the other games they are playing online.

nope.avi But what do we need this poll for? what purpose will the end statistic provide? People will always get lag in games, regardless what game it is. The internet is not 100% perfect.

GL playing in a Cleveland, if it moves lets say two tiers up. No chance at all for the Cleveland. Pensacola and Cleveland should switch tier spots.

Well WG fails so far, to solve annoying bugs / ingame stuff in the game. Which could lead to people getting feed up. For so long, people have talked about the ingame watch being too small and well hidded. And when you are in binocular mode, it almost covers up the entire watch. People have complained about the ingame chat system is worthless. Unfair MM sometimes. Not enough ingame modes. These are just some quick ones I grapped, that I know have been talked about before. But as with many other feedback topics, they gets drowned. And WG never look at them. So these along with alot more stuff, might be the reason people dropping off.

We wanted ingame horns. But some people thought little kids would spam it too much. Now we have voices instead.

Ad what is wrong here? request timeouts in traceroute is common. Its just an device that doesnt respond to ICMP. Acording to your traceroute, average seems to be around 45ms. 45ms ingame ping.

19 m/s response? dude that is ALOT. Back when I had my old copper connection 10/1, I would get 10 m/s. Now I got fiber 20/20. And I get 1 m/s from the test at speedtest. Are you sure the problem is not in your end? Anyways I have no choppy lag issues with my wows and neither does my friends, so it is not a broadcast problem. Again, if you get 19 m/s from the test at speedtest, then there is something big going on in your end.

Some people likes the Atlanta, others dont. It seems you should have done some research on this ship, before you bought it. And made the decision if this ship really suits your playstyle. I have seen plenty of Atlanta ships wrecking stuff and killing more ships compared to others in the same match. I have also seen Atlanta getting wrecked so fast. Depends on who sails the ship and his / her playstyle, to make the best out of it.

I wonder if Cleveland will get some AA competition from the final german line of cruisers.

yes priggishness. I also said "in most scenarios" not all. Which means in many cases, lag is mostly related to network and fps issues to pc hardware. Surely games that are capped at 30 / 40fps, should give you no lag problems at all. I also just found this article here. Which explains lag vs fps quite good http://www.howtogeek.com/142193/htg-explains-why-lag-and-low-fps-arent-the-same-thing/ But anyways good weekend.

Well that is just priggishness. In most scenarios, lag is related to connection and fps to computer.

Just wait. Let me tear it down: Most of us agree it is too early, to already release this game. Because of many things alot have typed down. So what happens the 17th september? This forum gets drowned in people complaining why this and that isnt working / isnt there / and so on. More so than now. So prepare yourself. There will be enough topics around the corner very soon once the game has been releashed.

I was trolling with that first comment section about religion stuff . I have been referring to the voting statistic twice. So I am not sure what you from from me.

EDIT: nvm

That made no sense at all. Why are we talking about religion now? There is no denying this topic has no more purpose. The voting process is still the same. If you still want to keep howling, I wont stop you. But it serves no purpose. Since 16th august people have voted. And the favor in a huge lead, still goes to Cleveland not in a need of a nerf.

what?

Another howling topic about the Cleveland, that some people think it is too strong. Havent we had enough of them already? Just lock this topic already someone. Cleveland shell velocity discussed: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/19969-cleveland-shell-velocity/ Cleveland being too OP discussed:http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/22194-cleveland-is-soooooo-op/ Cleveland nerf discussed:http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/22530-cleveland-nerf/ Cleveland howitzers discussed:http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/25599-cleveland-howitzers/

What do you want from us, with that post of yours?

low range AA is useless. And besides, Cleveland got higher AA DPS vs. Pensacola. Evem medium range AA, Cleveland still got higher AA DPS. So the bottom line is Cleveland is the better AA platform ship when put up against Pensacola.

Actually Cleveland still got better AA than Pensacola.