Flaming_Bunny

So, lately I have managed to land "Penetration" hits that deal 0 damage. Is this normal? Should I bug report it? I know I have been playing this game a lot but I have not really thought about this issue yet, maybe I have not experienced it before or maybe just not noticied it. Best Regards Me

thanks

Did you make sure the enemy did not have the assured aquisition skill? He could spot you through the island as long as he was within 3 km of you, but if you do not have the same skill you would not see him until you were 2 km from him (through the island) Just wondering. Best Regards Me

I can tell you that I "insta-died" when one of my turrets (using a new mexico) hit my div-mate/friends T6 cruiser while I was shooting at a ship far away and my friends rear just happend to show itself infront of me And I got pink. I am far from a team-killer, nor do I ever do team damage except this time and the occasional bumping with fellow team mates. I do not torp from second line and I try to play smart all the time. So when I got insta-killed for 1 turret hitting my division friend whom I always play with, then I wonder if this solution is working properly at all. /me

Hi all. This is in no way meant to be salty or whiny. I just want to point out that for those who are considering purchasing this destroyer. It will only be able to hit Battleships with its torpedoes. (Oh, and carriers as someone pointed out) The torpedoes can not hit Cruisers or Destroyers. Now, one of my favorite destroyers is the YueYang, so I am well aware of how deep water torpedoes works. So when I had skimmed the wiki (sadly missing the part about these torpedoes not being normal deep water torpedoes) I thought this could be a really nice ship. Possibly a bit OP even. Imagine my surprise when I find out in the middle of a match that I can not even torpedo cruisers.. So, have I learnt my lesson? Possibly, if the lesson is to get rid of my partial dyslexia then no, that is not possible. What I feel is that a thing like the difference in these deep water torpedoes is so drastic that it should be pointed out in big text on the actual shop page. It should not just be hidden in the fine print in a wiki-page. Because no where on the actual shop-page (https://eu.wargaming.net/shop/wows/main/8802/) does it say that these are not normal deep water torpedoes. No where on the page does it say that these torpedoes only hits battleships. If I had seen that part of information then I would have given it a second and a third thought before deciding wether or not to purchase this ship. Keep in mind that I did read most of the wiki before purchasing this ship. But with the vast amount of text on the wiki page, a lot of players skim the text to find the interesting parts. Me, I have to skim it else I will not be able to read through it. I will not ask for a refund. Worst case I might sell it in game. I just really think that a detail like that has to be clearly written and explained to the customer before he or she buys it ignorantly. So I guess this is feedback to WG.

MM , aka Matchmaker or Painful

Oh I agree totally. Which is why I included all details in my personal comparison. /Me

So, not entirely related to my original post. After playing it several rounds. I think this boat needs a nerf :) understand me correctly, I love it, I perform good with it. But that's just it. Personally I am not very good at this game but even I keep a constant 100k+ average damage with it. I do around 60k average with all my other destroyers from tier 8-10. According to its general average stats , this destroyer outperforms all other destroyers (including Tier X) in terms of damage dealt, base xp earned, and kills per round. It is just slightly below the shima's average winrate. Of course I am just one person saying this. I guess we will see what happens in the end. Best Regards Me

1. Description - Typo in the premium shop on the Asashio. (2018-05-04) 2. Reproduction steps: Go to https://eu.wargaming.net/shop/wows/main/8802/ Read the details Try to understand the word "Dodage" 3. Result Giggle a little Appreciate wargamings attempt at informing the customers on what type of torpedoes these are :) 4. Expected result Change the spelling to "Dodge" 5. Technical details N/A Best Regards Me

Love the word "Dodage" ;) /Me

please zip your ~\crashes\ folder, upload it to any online file storage and add the link to your report. Best Regards Me

Hi. You are entitled to your opinion. :) I still stand by mine. I have expressed myself enough on that matter in this whole thread already. Regarding changing my mind? I literally wrote "Worst case I might sell it in game", that is not the same as "I'm selling it", something I cannot recall saying. Nor did I say I loved it. (I just proved that I know how to play it and I did call it OP in the first post) So I am not sure how you could perceive it as a "Change of mind". But just for the sake of your comments. Are you saying that people are not allowed to change their minds during a thread discussion? We are human, we are capable of changing our minds after all. I would not be angry at someone for changing his/her mind, unless I wanted to make him/her angry, then I would possibly point it out :) Regarding "So it is basically complaining about nothing" love that comment because it is so true. Because I am not complaining, I am expressing an area that could be improved. :) In post #15 I wrote : I guess I am pointing with my whole hand at WG for not being very informative. At the same time I guess I also want to give all the new uninformed players a voice by expressing this. I can only imagine how many new players that wants a cool tier 8 ship only to fail from the get go as they lacked some information upon the purchase. I am totally sure that as long as situations like these happen in this game, there will be a lot of players that will react this way. It does not matter if these players are new or experienced players. As long as it happens it would save time and energy for everyone if that little part of information had been written there in the first place. And there will always be people like Oldschool and such that oppose threads like these. Best Regards Me

uzmanīgi! Neplīst :) They are all still learning :) /Me

oh Wargaming personell are experts at not writing information where it should be :) /Me

Guys. Read the title. "Super-league" It is only available after or if you reach rank 1 in the normal ranked mode! If someone by chance managed to reach rank 1 already , they can do it. Best Regards Me

Yes, I can confirm that this happens to a lot of us. The icon looks like that of a ship actively spotted by team mates in a storm (outlined), but in reality there is nothing there and it is not a "Last known marker" 1. Description Ship markers linger as if they were "Actively spotted" ships in the mini-map even if the ship has moved away. 2. Reproduction steps I have last known markers enabled on my mini-map.(Might have something to do with it.) 3. Result Mini-map tells us that we have an "Active spot" , similar to that in a storm , where other players spot the ships but we are out of spotting range Except we are not out of spotting range, it is a bug in the map marker system 4. Expected result My guess is these should be displayed as "Last known"-markers instead of "Active"-markers. 5. Technical details See the image: Best Regards Me

1. Description This is not a bug report, it is a request for a quite important improvement regarding captain skill point count visibility It is only affecting captains with a light/bright top/shirt/jacket (Such as the ARP-Captains or any future captains that fall into the same category) 2. Reproduction steps Look at the skill point count on any captain with a light/bright top/shirt/jacket. (shown in my pictures below) 3. Result Close to or sometimes completely impossible to see how many skill points said captain has. 4. Expected result I would hope for a black outline on the skill point number to make the text contrast better over any and all colors. (See example suggestion below) 5. Technical details I see that there is a bit of drop shadow on the text it self, maybe increase the strength of the drop shadow or change the text to an outlined type of text I realize that some may think this is of no importance because it is only affecting a small group of captains, but the fix should really be very easily implemented and some players use these captains as normal captains for normal ships. Best Regards Me

I thank you for your polite way of expressing your point of view :) I want to defend my honor a little by saying I did look up info on the ship. I did read about it on the wiki and missed the part about the torpedoes because I did not actively look for that particular "information-type". No I did not "Youtube" it. And I still stand by my opinion about lack of crucial information on the sales page. Anyway, once again. I am in no way complaining about the ship. Not saying it is bad because it is not. My current stats with it are: winrate : 100% Average Damage: 105 451 Average Frags: 1.67 And I will no longer post in this thread because I have expressed my opinion enough times now :) Best Regards Me

This is one more reason to why I created this thread. I guess the best comparison would be to imagine this. Fictional new ship at the Shop Pages: Sales Pitch: Here is the awesome new Premium Battleship HMS Ape It has awesome AP Bullets. It is awesome at killing battlerships and Carriers. To read the specifications, go to the wiki (some link) Then in the wiki you find that the AP Bullets can not hit Detroyers or Cruisers and it has no HE (no biggy on the HE part) The question then is. Would everyone actively look in the wiki for that limitation or would they expect these AP bullets to be like normal AP bullets? Because I expected the deep water torpedoes to be just that, deep water torpedoes. So I did not actively look for that limitation and I know so well that so many other players will make the same mistake. Now for any late joiners to this thread. I love my Asashio.

I usually have a 100 000 credit loss as a result of a crash, instead of a 100-700k profit

Sorry oldschool Already covered all that. And once again you prove my point. The "Sale page" does not contain the information, It refers to a wiki page that contains the ONE detail that this is all about. A new type of deep water torpedo that is unable to hit cruisers.. (Maybe you were not aware of that part, considering how you keep on ranting.) You also seem to have gotten stuck on the initial text in the first post without having the abilty to take in new information. You seem to think this is all about "Selling or not selling" this ship. I have responded to your replies several times and have fed you with information that you failed to acquire on your own. I have written in several places that I may keep the ship but you just keep on pushing on matters that are completely beyond the point of this thread despite us having explained it to you. So with all that in mind. It feels like you would rather take a piss on me than try to understand my point. If that is arrogant or not, Ill let you decide. Best Regards Me

1. Description Game Crash in the midst of close range battle 2. Reproduction steps Mostly had this problem with destroyers 3. Result Game crash while alive, reconnect , find myself dead. 4. Expected result I will refrain from explaining my expected result as it seems somewhat obvious. 5. Technical details Faulting application name: WorldOfWarships.exe, version: 0.7.4.0, time stamp: 0x5addc762 Faulting module name: ucrtbase.dll, version: 10.0.16299.248, time stamp: 0xdcc3eab0 Exception code: 0xc0000409 Fault offset: 0x0009348b Faulting process id: 0x2ab8 Faulting application start time: 0x01d3df7c10ea6aaa Faulting application path: C:\Games\World_of_Warships\WorldOfWarships.exe Faulting module path: C:\Windows\System32\ucrtbase.dll Report Id: c511af23-55a8-4f9c-b819-aedc4cb54960 Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID: Faulting application name: WorldOfWarships.exe, version: 0.7.4.0, time stamp: 0x5addc762 Faulting module name: ucrtbase.dll, version: 10.0.16299.248, time stamp: 0xdcc3eab0 Exception code: 0xc0000409 Fault offset: 0x0009348b Faulting process id: 0x4258 Faulting application start time: 0x01d3dee716da7c61 Faulting application path: C:\Games\World_of_Warships\WorldOfWarships.exe Faulting module path: C:\Windows\System32\ucrtbase.dll Report Id: 3b813736-9ac8-4794-bc61-c79bb991779a Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID: crashes.rar If you encounter this error, please zip your ~\crashes\ folder, upload it to any online file storage and add the link to your report. And crash again..... crashes2.zip

From post 15 ^ I also wanted to use the "Read all posts" remark because everyone else used that comment on me regarding this thread. Just to prove a point :) Also. Oldschool, you wrote "So, whats the point to this thread? Only point is that you didnt check the information that is provided on the product in the store, or what?" - That is exactly where my point is. I did check the information on the product in the store. The information was NOT available on the product in the store. Also, while posting this last post, I had this game: ^My second random battle in this ship^ /Me

So, You just answered why I did not see all the posts about this ship. I suggest you read this post #15 (I tried linking to post #15 but I failed, so I edited this post )

Did you just reply to the topic without reading all my replies in the thread? That is really rude :) In my opinion, a thread should be seen as a discussion, not just interpreted by its first post. I can not recall ever saying the ship was bad. I know I can perform good with it. My first random battle with it gave me: . Victory, with first place in the team by score. . 1868 Base XP . 129798 k damage . 2 kills . 3 compliments If you had read the follow up replies you would understand why I posted this thread. Best Regards Me