Redcap375

KoTS finals, what were the ships used in the final? What percentage was Russian? What percentage was in the game to COUNTER that Russian ship? That about sums it up really.

Yes Russian BB's are a joke. We all know it but don't wanna highjack the thread. Italian cruisers are different so it is what it is, like when the RN ones came out. I'll give them a go like most things then make comment. Only have the GC and Duca. One is very strong and the other one...Meh to bad.

So if you have 3 Krems in a game, your practically useless against them. Great, that sounds fantastic for a cruiser. But anyway, i'm gonna wait until i play them first. I can just see some writing on the walls first. I don't wanna have another DD killer cruiser line as there are too many of them already and better at it (on paper). Nor do i want cruiser killers as we have them too in the form of Supercrusiers and Battleships. I want a cruiser to be versatile but it sounds like it's more of a cruiser killer line with this SAP.

Fire? At least other ships have fire to work with. Like the smol for example. Lol But yeah, the krem armour is a joke regardless.

Not played them yet, still waiting for that container drop for missions. However, clans mates have and said they were crap. Something about not being able to do shell damage the Krem too? Lol Personally I love the look of the Venezia (9 upfront guns cant be bad) and will reserve judgement until i actually play them.

Played it, completed it with different nations, yeah.... Grew up on Strat games like the first DUNE and Command and Conquer. Masters of Orion and the original sim city? Loved those game. Those are solo game IMHO. Games like this , Battlefield and Star Citizen are more social games for me.

And handicaps sounds great right? Wrong. There is a reason football teams don't do it and leagues are set, unlike these individual sports. First is money (WG wont ever do it) and second people will wanna be worse than they already are. Being a golfer myself, this is a lovely article I read a while ago but sums it up better than i could. I totally agree with it. https://www.nationalclubgolfer.com/news/foghorn-golf-handicap-system-scrapped/

And there is nothing wrong with that, we just have different things that "float our boat". I enjoy more of the social aspect of these kinda game. If i personally wanted to play solo games, i would play games like HoI4 or Crusader kings.

I'm completely the opposite. I do not see the fun in sledge hamming puppies and making sure i'm not on the team with the most "muppets". The better team should win, not the team with the least amount of very bad players like it is now. That's creates a bad atmosphere in general. CB's however rely on skill, tactics, teamwork and structure. You play teams within your own skill level. If your not good enough, you don't progress. Unlike Randoms where you can sleepwalk to tier 10. If it wasn't for CB's or bare minimum Div's, i wouldn't be playing this game.

It's all subjective. You call it "whiners" others call it "a problem", depending on what side of the fence your currently sitting. But they are not the same and never will be, each will play WOWS differently as we are all humans, not robots . Jobs don't define who someone is or capable of being. So we should all bow down to the lowest denominator and handicap the good players in a "equal opportunities" team game on the same side? Ever heard of Communism? They don't tend to do very well because of one simply reason....Human nature. If we did stuff like that then we would still be using coal as a source of heat. What you will in fact be doing is punishing the better players or those that wanna learn with no reward system to outset the effort. If like you said "expect them to be equal" how can that be when they both have different tools to do the same job? Your idea and your philosophy is contradictory. The fact of the matter is this....WG has put all of us in the same team, good and bad players and we simply have to live with it. It creates chaos but it's the way it is. The question is...Does frustration make money in these kind of games? I think they do.

Precisely, they ARE on the same pitch in the same game. The rest is irrelevant. That is not their own league, don't confuse the two. The skills should represent their league which this game doesn't. So they are completely different and we cant moan either way. Why do we think football teams have distinctions between the two? So WG has caused chaos basically. However, all this will create is the players that want to learn leaving due to frustration. This will always happen when the overall quality of a game and it's players diminishes. "Rashford" will leave that team out of pure frustration when he sees the goal keeper drinking tea in his clown outfit on a unicycle.

Just for those that haven't read this very funny but very true comment on the 1st page. I know I've already added it twice but cant help myself.

Wrong. You can not use that analogy for WOWS. Simply because there are DEDICATED leagues, all of which have different expectations..That isnt the case for WOWS as ALL the players play the same league. So lets say your a Man U punter. Would you like to see Sunday leagues players playing along side Rashford? Do you think that is good for the team or Rashford? No. Rashford will get cheesed off that he is dragging the other players along playing like crazy and the punters wont turn up to the matches to see them constantly lose as they have crap players. So the "good" players have every right to moan and the "not so good" players will have every right to tell them to shut up as they have every right to play in the same team (Because it's the RULES) So until WG create different leagues with same skill or MM, both side are right in their own way. My biggest thing is "Pride". I don't wanna drag the teams down with my generally bad skill so i learnt to get better. I don't want others to fail due to my incompetence. However, as this world is now-a-days some people simply don't care about anything expect themselves and have no pride whatsoever.

Already asked but can you please increase Clan Members, 50 really isn't enough.

@absolute_justice and his Div mates in a KIDD+CV on the enemy team. We pulled back what should have been a lose for us and yeah...Won in the end. That radar really bugged you up Nice to see you mate.

2020? First is decide what is more important to you as a company. Your players or your wallet. If it's your wallet then just carry on like your doing.

This ^^^. However, i wouldn't say "great" anymore. But your right, their is nothing like it on the market and they know that. The people working in the background do a great job, fantastic job in fact and some of the ship models are mouth watering. However, it's the marketing and balance department (or the same thing it appears) which is a cause of major concern. But they can only do what they can do with a metaphoric gun pointed at their head. I'm sure they sit there and go "this isnt right, this ship isnt right for the game" but they need to eat like the rest of us. OP, i think you are happy because your native ship line has just come out....

We can hope mate. As LWM clearly stated: And the stats show: Stalingrad U.S.S.R. 413 186 57.66 % 1.04 96 325 2 053 4.06 1.92 Colbert France 16 503 54.48 % 0.95 81 406 1 976 3.81 1.89 Smolensk U.S.S.R. 330 817 50.96 % 0.94 87 462 1 876 3.19 1.82 "And the stats will go down after a while, no worries" some of the forumites said. So over a year later.....Ho bloody Ho Those that were saying things like, makes us look inapt. We know who you were

@Crysantos has been at the gin again and playing the WG diplomat. Remains the worst ship in this game I have played to date. When I see a Pens in my teams, it's never good news and the first to die. Looks like it's still the worst even after the move to tier 6!! That is bad, very bad. Admiral Graf Spee Germany 3 040 478 53.45 % 0.66 32 372 1 032 0.99 1.09 Perth Commonwealth 439 233 53.35 % 0.73 32 178 1 186 0.93 1.24 HSF Admiral Graf Spee Germany 331 854 53.31 % 0.64 31 110 1 053 0.92 1.06 Dallas U.S.A. 851 853 52.33 % 0.62 29 583 1 105 2.62 0.99 Leander U.K. 4 236 063 52.33 % 0.76 31 057 1 079 0.99 1.23 De Grasse France 539 125 51.91 % 0.64 31 530 1 100 1.01 0.99 Duca d'Aosta Italy 658 724 51.67 % 0.63 28 187 1 109 0.89 0.98 Budyonny U.S.S.R. 4 181 512 51.59 % 0.68 32 474 1 075 0.83 1.03 Huanghe Pan-Asia 235 488 51.44 % 0.67 29 249 1 187 2.59 1.06 Molotov U.S.S.R. 1 065 765 51.36 % 0.66 33 320 1 165 0.79 0.99 Admiral Makarov U.S.S.R. 34 340 50.74 % 0.64 34 631 1 159 1.20 1.03 Aoba Japan 5 890 569 50.59 % 0.61 27 400 1 031 1.23 0.94 Cleveland (<31.05.2018) U.S.A. 10 440 516 50.56 % 0.67 28 058 946 2.37 1.04 La Galissonnière France 3 046 956 50.53 % 0.56 27 998 971 1.18 0.82 Nürnberg Germany 9 713 802 49.46 % 0.55 25 506 958 0.58 0.79 Pensacola U.S.A. 964 237 49.41 % 0.49 25 735 935 2.04 0.72 Rock bottom. Lets not mention this ship again please. There is so much wrong with this ship and the only good thing (the heavy AP for it's tier) doesn't bring it close at all. Not with that turret turn and reload! If you do grind the American Cruiser line, skip this one.

Both are good. If you plan to get the Ohio, then prob the Thunderer.

Do you think that is player related or WG's doing. Yes i know this is tin foil hat time, but somethings don't add up. Like things are predetermined or one-sided with something (bad RNG, teams, unfair MM ect) before the game, however slightly. Could be completely wrong, but losing streaks and winning streaks are too...I dont know the words really, but feels like it's meant to happen. Never understate a company that needs to make money, i'm sure there are some hidden files somewhere (like the hacker found in WARTHUNDER). I suppose all this it's impossible, but that leaves the motive why WG would do it... Just something that had been on my "doing nothing" mind when i have 2 mins to engage that at work.

Then that is your choice. Have your opinions then fine mate, but if you are taking about something you don't even get involved with then that kinda...Well, doesn't really give your comments creditably does it? Glad your happy with your clan though and that's the most important bit

Good points... My initial thoughts on 2 BB's were negative for a number of reasons, but we just don't know yet, only guess. Could be the catalyst for CV's though. It is only a matter of time before those things come in, they didn't with the RTS and that was one of WG's biggest mistakes from a "get people play them" point of view. Why play them when they are useless for the Clan? Oh well, lets see but I hope to god it's not infested with coal/steel ships.

Then join a clan that plays CB's?