Peffers

I've sourced my opinion, can you?

the basis of which is the sale happens in the juristication in which the purchaser is habitually domiciled not the seller's business address, thus you must follow Cypriot Law if the purchaser resides in Cyprus. Anyway the rights are EU rights, I used the UK as I knew where to look.

Actually in EU law isn't it the country in which the customer is "habitually domiciled" rather the country in which the seller resides. At least that is true for products I have given advice on development and sales.

Something for a our UK players to think about for goods faulty or not acting as described at purchase. The Consumer Rights Act 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-rights-for-consumers-when-buying-digital-content These rules apply after 30 days of purchase for online purchases anything from a fridge to a digital download. * after 30 days, retailers have one opportunity to repair or replace any goods and the consumer can choose whether they want the goods to be repaired or replaced - if the attempt at a repair or replacement is unsuccessful, the consumer can then claim a refund or a price reduction if they wish to keep the product.

For those in the UK. The Consumer Rights Act 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-rights-for-consumers-when-buying-digital-content These rules apply after 30 days of purchase for online purchases anything from a fridge to a digital download. * after 30 days, retailers have one opportunity to repair or replace any goods and the consumer can choose whether they want the goods to be repaired or replaced - if the attempt at a repair or replacement is unsuccessful, the consumer can then claim a refund or a price reduction if they wish to keep the product.

apart from F spam, which should have been obvious prior to release. takes away realism and is just console arcade.

they would never allow a vote say 3 options: 1 roll back and improve 0.7 2 continue with 0.8 3 rollout 0.9 with no CVs, with appropriate compensation. I think it is the old Soviet mentality that the boss knows best and nobody else should unless a crony's advice. They see negotiation and fact finding as a vindication tool or a weakness.

This is a total snafu. Shame nobody at WG has the cojones to admit it. Just spending this amount of resources on improving the old meta would have been amazing but gameplay obviously would be boring for console kids. However, with the bad reputation CVs will have no console jock would spend their parents' money on it.

It would appear that CVs are dead. At least DD players will go back to DDs rather than Noob'ing around in BBs.

why click to participate?

oh dear WG what have you done? It would seem that the console version of CV play is fundamentally broken; I wonder if anyone at WG has the Cojones to admit it does not work, bite the bullet on wasted money on development, and initiate a RTS roll back and improvement programme? This the problem with dictating what the players want ( i assume trying to amortise WOWP development cost with partial re-use) rather than communication in a constructive manner with the player population.

I have not expressed an opinion , just commented on your idiotic trolling. If you had the courtesy to ask, I would say it needs time and adjustment, but it is not strictly wrong for WG.

yes and you were not very good at it hence <5%.

with you, you really don't need look at a profile.

Not helpful as you do not play CVs and has nothing to do with the thread. I would say to you "Respect is not given; you have to earn it".