Ocsimano18

Couldn't resist the click bait. There is a new QUIZ (for some goodies?). Has someone figured out the answers? https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/history/a-look-through-time-german-destroyers/

There should be a proofreading process of the English version by someone who speaks English good enough and knows the game well, like SubOctavian.

It does not matter. WG has no maddening influence on most of their players.

Another take on the auction, more than a hundred thousand active players bid less than 80M credits, so we are not as fool as WG expects us to be.

90% of the playerbase is in the 45-55% WR bracket, so they lose about half of the matches anyway. I like to keep track of my stats, but realistically, it’s the same experience in the big picture level.

Another consideration: Lenin is the cheapest premium T8 BB. Priced for us comrades.

I stopped using combat signals. The fun is the same, and should you care about a few percentages in WR? Flags or not, you will still lose about 50 matches from 100.

Vlad has 1.6, Lenin 1.7, but with the Russian dispersion which is much better from close to mid ranges. Also Lenin has some better Russian dispersion retaining the original bugged dispersion formula, but the details are black magic. In long range shooting contests that happens in some T10 matches, you won’t hit much with Lenin, but she’s a beast in most of the matches.

On the news it was written that same number of winners on each server. They did not even change the news. that’s not clear communication.

What is the loss of Wargaming? Any remaining reputation, me not spending a penny anymore. If they liead on such a small issue then there is no reason to trust them.

The news articles are not google translator quality, but on professional human translation level. You cannot write such a text with google translate.

It would count as false advertistment. The court does not care from where/how it was translated.

Also the same limit on the Asia server:

They wrote that the number of winners was the same on each server. Were they lying in an advertistment? Mathematically, they cannot have the same number of winners and the same credit limit for winning across servers.

It was also written that there are equal number of winners per server. That can be lying in an advertistment, which is a court case.

Yes, and if the servers share the pool, then the number of winners will be different per server. Conclusion: RIGGED!!!

You can teach the OP how to farm silver.

A f2p guy just spent 100M credits on the auction. I’m on premium account but stopped buying signals since the last change. I don’t want to deplete my credits.

You can only get Pommern or Marceau from my list, both of them are fun, Marceau is more competitive, but you have the Smaland for competitive purposes, Pommern is Kurfurst with torps, if you like Germans with torps, then take the Pommern, if you like fast DDs then the Marceau, if neither then hold onto your coal waiting for something of your taste. I can imagine that you can gain free doubloons, I just expected f2p players to not swim in credits.

Communication was not clear, I deduced it from the same winning limits on NA and EU, and from the time of the results calculation and the vague description on WG’s site.

You don’t have a couple of essential coal ships, like Jean-Bart, Pommern or Marceau. It seems you somehow grind much less coal and much more silver than I having a premium account.

It seems 5000 was the total number and 1250 on each server.

You have like 20,000 battles, and probably the Missouri, too. I also was able to bid 80M, but that was much beyond my personal valuation of 100k coal.

This seems to be a whale only price. Also NA and EU limits are virtually the same. Either there was a common prize pool across servers, or WG artificially rigged the “calculations”, at least we would understand why a few lines of code takes more than 30 minutes to execute.

Outrageous, to put it simply.