Ocsimano18

Even kids don’t like this kids mode. I let my niece and nephew play it and they left the mode with disgust after a few minutes. They ocassionally enjoy regular ship play.

You can play your T10s. Either you play well and make profit, or you play one match with any of the freely obtainable T9 premiums and play another with your T10. Does it cause a pain and great suffering to play your T9 premiums?

Announced on today’s stream. Gibraltar T10 british CA for RB Kearsarge T9 US BB Hybrid for coal Tulsa US T9 CA for coal Time of availibilty for purchase is unkown.

Since you’re a co-op player, go for Napoli. She’s tanky, has excellent secondaries and torps, all you need for co-op fun.

As others have pointed out, there is no mercy rule. There are points for both teams, and if one team gets below zero point, then they lose. You can lose points by losing ships, and gain points by killing ships or from caps. The OP probably does not know the point mechanics, as it’s not so relevant in co-op, and by the way a lot of random players also ignore the points and are out there for farming damage.

Prinz Heinrich Kracken: Also spent my community tokens on these: I'm close to finishing my Akizuki grind and getting the Kita the first time.

Why do you compare a premium ship to a grind bumper designed to make you suffer and cough up your money to convert FreeXP? You could also compare Georgia and Jean-Bart to Minnesota, even Iowa or Izumo are better ships. Hizen is comparable, but she was a dockyard ship, another inferior design that you can get for less cash.

It’s fun to play her ocassionally, but she did not became a goto ship in my fleet. It’s easy to have good damage numbers, but my battle impact is less than that of a regular premium BB, because I cannot get close and cannot tank. I have more battle impact in longer, balanced games, but we see less and less of that. For example, I can spot the position of the red team, early in the battle, but your average Saturday team does not care for spotting, they get butchered anyway, while you’re losing a lot of time doing the spotting. Also, I cannot get close and draw fire on my ship, giving our noob cruisers a chance to retreat. It’s an elegant weapon for a more civilized age.

The heal sucks, but the biggest issue with Siegfried is overpens. You have a lot of unworthy 2-3k salvos. The short fuse time and the better pen angles can give a much better average damage than that of the Siegfried, despite of the worse dispersion. Just have trust in Soviet balance, comrade

SHAFT defeat VOR 2:1 BANCV defeated SMILE 2:1 Some very good matches. EU will win KOTS, for sure.

https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/243 A large artillery ship (Project 69-I), which resembles a swift "small battleship". The ship's main armament is represented by six powerful 380 mm guns placed in three turrets. Her AP-shells have improved ricochet angles and a short fuse time. The ship also enjoys quite good concealment parameters. Sevastopol is equipped with the Fast Damage Control Team consumable, which differs from the standard Damage Control Party by its faster reload while having a limited number of charges. Besides, that ship has the Defensive AA Fire and Hydroacoustic Search consumables in one slot, an Engine Boost with a short action time, but a larger bonus to speed, and a Repair Party that has a longer action time, but replenishes less HP per second. Soviet cruiser Sevastopol, tier XHit points – 62,600. Plating - 25 mm.Fires duration: 60 s.Main battery - 3x2 380 mm. Firing range - 19.1 km.Maximum HE shell damage – 5,350. HE shell armor penetration - 64 mm. Chance to cause fire – 34%. HE initial velocity - 820 m/s. Maximum AP shell damage - 11,300. AP initial velocity - 820 m/s. Reload time - 26.0 s. 180 degree turn time - 36.0 s. Maximum dispersion - 208 m. Sigma – 2.05.Secondary Armament:8x2 100.0 mm, range - 7.3 km.Maximum HE shell damage – 1,400. Chance to cause fire – 6%. HE initial velocity - 1,000 m/sAA defense: 8x2 100.0 mm., 6x2 57.0 mm.AA defense mid-range: continuous damage per second - 385, hit probability - 90 %, action zone - 4.0 km;AA defense long-range: continuous damage per second - 130, hit probability - 90 %, action zone - 5.8 km;Number of explosions in a salvo - 6, damage within an explosion - 1,470, action zone 3.5 - 5.8 km.Maximum speed - 33.5 kt. Turning circle radius - 980 m. Rudder shift time – 15.1 s. Surface detectability – 14.0 km. Air detectability – 10.4 km. Detectability after firing main guns in smoke – 12.8 km.Available consumables:Slot 1 - Fast Damage Control Team (Duration time 10 s; Reload time 40 s; Charges 3)Slot 2 - Hydroacoustic Search/Defensive AA FireSlot 3 - Engine Boost (Duration time 45 s; Maximum speed +20%; Reload time 60 s; Charges 6)Slot 4 - Repair Party (Duration time 60 s; HP per second 187.8; Reload time 80 s; Charges 6)

SC80V7WPEHLZ Latest one.

Actually, no radar, but 11km concealment, and speedboost, if I remeber correctly.

I defeated a BANCV guy in his brand new Gibraltar, today. So I had an effect on their lives, at least.

KOTS code from the final: B8XNR0L5PCC7

Turned back the game in the last minute by sinking the enemy CV. I got killed by the salty remaining BB, but trading my DD for a CV gave us +35 points net: Just enough to win by 4 points: Got -2 karma from the enemy team and +1 karma from my team: Epic Win!

Most T8 plane kills, capture assist and defense points, damage probably done on DD or the T9 ship, plus variety bonus of doing quite a lot of different things can add up.

I got Atlanta, a year ago.

She has the same issue as other smoke heavies: too big smoke firing penalty. Because of that the smoke is much less useful than for light cruisers, and you give up HE, the super heal and the torps. Seems to be a bad trade.

I’m happy that there is a new brawling line that actually works and fun at the same time. Maybe it powercreeps an already powercrept line, but it’s a small price to pay. The new ships are tech tree and easily obtainable for anyone, so stop the whining and join the fun.

I think Ragnar is for people who did not get Smaland. As a Smaland owner, I don’t see much point in getting her for my steel. Smaland can do the radar stunt better, thanks to the better concealment leaving less room for escaping your radar range, and has fast torps against BBs and cruisers, while Ragnar has to rely on farming, which is kind of booring. I have the Bourgogne and it was worth the steel, I like her better than the Jean-Bart, as she’s better suited to sail around and be constantly on the move. I’m not sure if I want the Stalingrad as my second steel ship. Maybe, I should wait for a new steel release and decide afterwards. I get bored by the semi static playstyle of the Moskva, and I don’t want to get bored for my precious steel.

Agir has torps, torps+co-op=money. Q.E.D.

Tirpitz is my most played ship, and I’d only pay about 20 euros, with coupons and stuff.

Which one do you prefer if you have both of them? I’ve clocked more than 500 battles with the Tirpitz, but I’m not sure if the Branderburg worth it. I also have the Odin which I play less than the Tirpitz.