Luke6_31

Just seen this CV appear in the shop. Does anyone have any thoughts or advice about it at the moment? Was hoping to get it but previous test iterations seemed somewhat flawed. If anyone has anything useful to help me out it would be good to hear it. Thanks

Quick question: I've searched quite alot of news articles hoping for infomation on how to earn/acquire Depot tokens for the Ruckus in the Depot section in the Armoury but there doesn't appear to be any info about this. Can someone enlighten me about this at all? Thanks. Safe Sailing

Check my posts date. I posted before that came out. They did explain after I made the post but also after the 1st reply.

Thanks. Shame, I liked the look of those rewards and was mentally gearing up for a grind to get some. Guess WG didn't fully explain these to maybe lure some people in.

Submarines are awful for the gameplay. The counter to them for Cruisers and Battleships is utterly inadequate. The range on the ASW weaponry needs to be increased to equivalent to range of main battery. This would allow these classes to counter them in a similar manner as they would other ships. At the moment being forced to close the distance is disgusting and utterly ruins the gameplay for these classes.

Quick question Crysantos: I missed the Development Blog where WOWS removed flags for achievments such as high caliber etc. Are you planning on reintroducing flags as a reward for these achievments or will there be another way of rewarding players for doing well at the game in this manner? Maybe I missed this announcement but it seemed like another way to aggressively monetise the game.

With the banning and limiting of certain ships for the current season. Can we assume that the incompetent berks who set this up might finally get fired? You were repeatedly warned about this sort of stuff yet your inability to sodding listen to anyone is becoming a pain. Wargaming, how about you appoint some community members to provide feedback and guidance so you don't constantly screw up? You could call them Community Contributors. That way these sort of issus might not happen. OH WAIT A MINUTE.... https://blog.worldofwarships.com/blog/195

Never said I thought I was valued. But EVERYONE benefited from LWM. She got the Thunderer into the game, she fixed turning radius, She did so much for all of the players of this game. The fact that a company would mistreat someone like this is insane.

HAHAHAHA. HAhahah. HAHa. ha. A broken clock is right twice a day. Wargaming has communication issues hourly at this rate. If they get something right it isn't by any actual thought. Accidents happen, but Wargaming can't even get those right.

LittleWhiteMouse. Arguably the best and most helpful CC in the entire WOWS community has just resigned. LWM: Thank you for eveything edited An update for you all: In the wee hours of August 12th, in one of the CC-Discord channels in front of everyone, a Wargaming employee decided to contradict me, belittle me and ignore evidence I was providing, all the while barking at me to show them respect. This is them "communicating better". It's completely unacceptable were it just an isolated incident. It's made hilariously bad in that it all but repeats what happened to Chobi and I leading up to the Yukon incident where a Wargaming employee contradicted us, belittled us and ignored the evidence we were providing regarding our work on Yukon. It took them almost an hour to finally apologize and admit they were wrong in this case, but only after other CCs had to dog-pile onto the situation. Wargaming has violated our agreement. It only took six weeks for Wargaming to go back on their word. I approached Sub_Octavian in an effort to repair matters. Given Wargaming's lack of updates on West Virginia, another ship they promised, trusting them to complete Huron is foolish. I told him that Wargaming has demonstrated that they cannot be trusted to honour their word. I needed a commitment from him to deliver three things: To work on repairing their corporate culture. To provide regular updates on Huron's progress. To add Sackville's camo to Yukon. Sackville's camo represents two things for me. First, it's tangible proof that Wargaming takes the above issue seriously and is willing to deliver something on the short term beyond simple apologies or vague, unbacked promises of a future project they may or may not deliver in a year's time. Second, it honours the time and energy Chobittsu and I put into the Yukon project over sixteen months. Sub_Octavian agreed to points #1 and #2, but not #3. They do not respect the time and energy Chobi and I put into the project or presently in the game. They see it as their right to mistreat Community Contributors and players and expect empty promises and hollow apologies to smooth things over. They have demonstrated they will do this repeatedly. Enough is enough. Effective immediately, I am resigning from the Community Contributor program. WARGAMING ARE NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE.

Sod WG. LWM has been such a help to myself and I'm sure many others. This is utterly unacceptable. WG have lost me as a player, as a Whale, as a closed Beta tester, as anything. There needs to be another company willing to create another game like WOWS, because this is disgraceful. Go to hell WG. I hope this game now dies. You can only pay for so many players whilst everyone else has abandoned this utterly sunk ship.

I saw on the Patch notes that Flint was available for coal but it hasn't appeared yet in the armoury. Is there any update on when it will appear?

Is there anyway of disabling the graphical effects this mode places on the screen. I played a battle with a CV and whilst controlling planes it took alot of effort not to vomit everywhere.

Japanese CA are very simple to play. Kite. Go toward enemy, then angle away, dodge and fire. With time you will learn when to pre-emtively turn away and then be ready to shoot. You have good concealment and rear firing torps. Kite and Shoot. IGNORE THE ORIGINAL POSTER and use the 155's on the mogami. Anyone who says otherwise is a fool

Torpedoes have a blast radius. This will work against modules in the blast radius. Some might roll luckily on the RNG/algorithm and others won't. Hence the result. Basically HE and Torps have blast radiuses and anything caught in the radius has to roll against that blast.

Hey WG. Do something about this ship. You know smoke and HE spammers doesn't work. (See Kutuzov & Belfast). [edited]SORT THIS crap OUT!!!. Also, Nerf the Soviet BB's FFS. I doubt you even play your own game sometimes. Just awful managment of this game.

NERF THIS [edited] SHIP TWATS!!!! REMOVE IFHE FOR IT!! DO SOMETHING TWATBUCKETS!!!

GET THE NERF BAT OUT FOR THIS SHIP/REMOVE IT FROM THE GAME/GIVE US THE OPTION TO NEVER PLAY AGINST IT

Hey WG. Why not make this a year long marathon. You have put in the work to a cool new system. The watching the ship build is incredible. Why not give us a year to get it done? I still believe that it might not be possible for most players. Or 6 months? You have put in the work to design a great new thing. Now let the player base enjoy it for a long time and enjoy your great work. It is such a greatly designed system and is fascinating to watch. But with a few tweaks it could be a year long competition. Especially with those directives....

Literally. It can go [edited]itself. I wonder if the Developers have ever played their own game. Gives me literally no hope for Submarines getting into this game. Plus the CV rework. Oh and lets not forget the crap show which were USSR BB's. [edited]hell Wargamming. Time to crack out the Nerf Bat and get things fixed. Sooner rather than later.

Dear Wargaming, Your inability to fix one of the original classes of ships shows that you are systematically incapable of introducing new ship classes to the game. Why not try and fix the current mess of a product you have produced instead of adding yet another riotous mistake. Currently Cv's need a buff to their effectiveness. Certainly all planes could do with going faster or at least gaining hitpoints/armour to enable a degree of effiecency in attacking enemy fleets. The current situation of having to ditch planes in order to make attacks indicates the failure of the design model. Failing that an all around buff to the damage dealt by carrier bourne weapons would also be a potential fix for this situation. This would enable carriers to effectively attack enemy vessels. Thanks,

BOTS need their PR guy spreading the love (and [edited]). BRING HIM BACK!!

Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it. Thanks

Lets end the madness. Stop having two CV's in a game.

You do realise WG that this is crap for gameplay. You do realise this is the worst [edited]thing ever. GET RID OF TWO CV GAMES. PLEASE. Thank you.