Jump to content

Luke6_31

Beta Tester
  • Content Сount

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    7864

About Luke6_31

  • Rank
    Able Seaman
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

658 profile views
  1. Luke6_31

    Snowstorm Mode: Nausea

    Is there anyway of disabling the graphical effects this mode places on the screen. I played a battle with a CV and whilst controlling planes it took alot of effort not to vomit everywhere.
  2. Luke6_31

    HerMajestys Ship Guides: Japanese Cruisers (aka How to get Zao fast)

    Japanese CA are very simple to play. Kite. Go toward enemy, then angle away, dodge and fire. With time you will learn when to pre-emtively turn away and then be ready to shoot. You have good concealment and rear firing torps. Kite and Shoot. IGNORE THE ORIGINAL POSTER and use the 155's on the mogami. Anyone who says otherwise is a fool
  3. Luke6_31

    Torped Belfast 43

    Torpedoes have a blast radius. This will work against modules in the blast radius. Some might roll luckily on the RNG/algorithm and others won't. Hence the result. Basically HE and Torps have blast radiuses and anything caught in the radius has to roll against that blast.
  4. Luke6_31

    Flint not available?

    I saw on the Patch notes that Flint was available for coal but it hasn't appeared yet in the armoury. Is there any update on when it will appear?
  5. Luke6_31

    Nerf Smolensk

    NERF THIS [edited] SHIP TWATS!!!! REMOVE IFHE FOR IT!! DO SOMETHING TWATBUCKETS!!!
  6. Luke6_31

    Nerf Smolensk

    GET THE NERF BAT OUT FOR THIS SHIP/REMOVE IT FROM THE GAME/GIVE US THE OPTION TO NEVER PLAY AGINST IT
  7. Luke6_31

    Indomitable: Worth it?

    Just seen this CV appear in the shop. Does anyone have any thoughts or advice about it at the moment? Was hoping to get it but previous test iterations seemed somewhat flawed. If anyone has anything useful to help me out it would be good to hear it. Thanks
  8. Hey WG. Why not make this a year long marathon. You have put in the work to a cool new system. The watching the ship build is incredible. Why not give us a year to get it done? I still believe that it might not be possible for most players. Or 6 months? You have put in the work to design a great new thing. Now let the player base enjoy it for a long time and enjoy your great work. It is such a greatly designed system and is fascinating to watch. But with a few tweaks it could be a year long competition. Especially with those directives....
  9. Luke6_31

    Nerf Smolensk

    Hey WG. Do something about this ship. You know smoke and HE spammers doesn't work. (See Kutuzov & Belfast). [edited]SORT THIS crap OUT!!!. Also, Nerf the Soviet BB's FFS. I doubt you even play your own game sometimes. Just awful managment of this game.
  10. Luke6_31

    [edited]SMOLENSK

    Literally. It can go [edited]itself. I wonder if the Developers have ever played their own game. Gives me literally no hope for Submarines getting into this game. Plus the CV rework. Oh and lets not forget the crap show which were USSR BB's. [edited]hell Wargamming. Time to crack out the Nerf Bat and get things fixed. Sooner rather than later.
  11. Dear Wargaming, Your inability to fix one of the original classes of ships shows that you are systematically incapable of introducing new ship classes to the game. Why not try and fix the current mess of a product you have produced instead of adding yet another riotous mistake. Currently Cv's need a buff to their effectiveness. Certainly all planes could do with going faster or at least gaining hitpoints/armour to enable a degree of effiecency in attacking enemy fleets. The current situation of having to ditch planes in order to make attacks indicates the failure of the design model. Failing that an all around buff to the damage dealt by carrier bourne weapons would also be a potential fix for this situation. This would enable carriers to effectively attack enemy vessels. Thanks,
  12. Luke6_31

    Bring Back Chickor..

    BOTS need their PR guy spreading the love (and [edited]). BRING HIM BACK!!
  13. Luke6_31

    Two CV Games

    Lets end the madness. Stop having two CV's in a game.
  14. Luke6_31

    NO MORE TWO CV GAMES

    Self-explaining really. It is crap for gameplay. It is crap for everything. Get rid of it. Thanks
  15. Luke6_31

    2cv games

    You do realise WG that this is crap for gameplay. You do realise this is the worst [edited]thing ever. GET RID OF TWO CV GAMES. PLEASE. Thank you.
×