GrossadmiralThrawn

ne... unmöglich... WG MUSS das in weiser Voraussicht geplant haben, die community war nur zu blöde soweit in die Zukunft zusehen wie WG Rasputin

und das Team das die meisten Kills an Team GC anrichtet hat gewonnen

dann werden wir alle wegen Marketingsabotage gebannt

Verbrannte Erde sagt dir was?

eben drum... wenn wirs für die Bauen können... aber nein... verdammt ich finde "Tarkins Antwort" zu Obamas ablehnung nicht...

PRAISE THE SUN! Wenn auch nicht das was wirklich braucht (bessere Panzerung an den Türmen) ist es besser als nichts jetz müssen se nur noch endlich die Schanrhorst und KA raushauen vlt. zu Maria Himmelfahrt?

pff luschen... ich bin noch immer dafür nen Todesstern zu bauen... mit der größe der Station und dem Hyperantrieb sollten wir npaar millionen n n paar wochen dahin schaffen... aber nein... sobalds ums Planetenvernichten kriegen die USA weiche knie... Atombomben ja immer gern... aber ein Planetenzerstörender Superlaser mit dem man auch super an Metall etc. die weit in unbewohnten Planeten und Asteroiden drinn is... nein danke... pff

gilt für die Karlsruhe ne Ausnahme?

man muss verstehen... es braucht viele Russische Prem schiffchen... ne mal ehrlich... die Albert könnte endlich rein... dann findet sich doch bestimmt ein netter Tier V oder so premium Kreuzer... (gäbs ncih das Namensproblem: Kreuzer Emden für Tier IV? wäre vlt. im Vergleich zur Karlsruhe sogar die bessere version gewesen... stock dann mit den EInzelkanonen und ausgebaut mit Zwillingstürmen)

es ist btw nicht die Bismarck... es ist die Tirpitz... scheinbar wurden Torpedowerfer gesichtet

at Tier IX and X actually the costs can be a factor... especially for players that havent saved up 2 bazllion credits... i'm for example somebody who only recently and for a short time had over 20mils... spend that on getting and upgrading the Yamato (didnt have much luck with her... many oveprens... misses, bounces and non pens) in one of... 4 or 5 games i broke even... and there i had 6mils or so saved... yet i'm a rather agressive player (more than it's good mostly...) and still go to the front... but i can see why people decide not to go to close... if you fire on a broadsiding cruiser or bb at 10km or less and only get overpens, misses and stuff and barely do any damage... and when the Destroyers appear... hey were did the restof the team go?... in one game i more or less took a whole bunch enemy fire onto me... didnt hit mcuh... didnt get enough damage to get anyway close to flags... but still had to pay... so even i ask myself...if i could defeat my inner attacker... why wouldnt i just stay back and hope to hit instead of go in and hope to hit...

bingo... for most cruiser and DD players it often ends up: BB fault... if they rush in with a Colorado or so coming behind them and it wasnt there in 5 seconds (21 knots VS over 30 mind you) the BB is camping... if they then buggered off when the BB would reach them it's the BBs fault for "yolo" in and die... or for playing stupid and showing broadside when it tries to get away from the enemy... coupled with the higher Repair costs at the high tiers this is one of the contributing factors in the camp-sniping of BBs...

the 28s are the main selling point... the outcry if we have no Scharnhorst class with historical weaponry (28s plus torps) here woul be fun

lel... we told them Tier III is a stupid idea...

actually the 28s are one of the reasons PEOPLE WANT TO BUY THAT SHIP... we want the Scharnhorst as the historical Scharnhorst it was... and the Bismarck compensates the Torpedoes by having 10km Secondaries (if buffed) on Tier VIII...

i liked Pirate Island, Saw a 5 lets play and actually already own Tropico 5 but not via steam and without DLC... so if i'd buy the DLC seperately it would be more expensive actually

the only reason i still have money on the side for the Scharn (and König Albert to an extend) is that there currently is a summer hole in terms of games... i just cant find anything i'd really dumb that money into.. maybe Stardew Valley... Tropico 5 wiht all DLC rigth now is 10 bucks on stean... hmm

wiht buggering off i mean: now they are 2 kms behind me... 5... 7... while i cant get away without getting everything the enemy has to offer into the broadside and me trying to either take out a cruiser praying for Citadel hits or atleast scare of a DD

especially for slow BBs on big maps there is... because it will take them ages to actually get into fighting distance otheriwse RNG is at long range and at close range... got lucky at long ranges... got screwed over at short ranges... got lucky at short ranges... got srewed over at long ranges... but the Problem is: if the RNG screws you over at long ranges you won't be at danger... so if we'd make BBs actually reliable at the area of 10km it'd be far more interesting for theBB drivers to ACTUALLY get there instead of try their luck who says anything about broadsiding? but you oftne wont be able to angle against every enemy ship in the area... especially if the cruisers and DDs got scared again after the first enemy Karlsruhe appeared in front of their Omaha and Königsberg with the Kongo right behind (nothing to say about hte early US bbs that crawl behind) and the Kongos armour inst impressive... just as the New Yorks bow and aft armour arent... some here want below 20km range for all BBs... others wanted 16 to 17... and it seems to be more a "JUST REDUCE IT I DONT CARE WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS" how should it be reduced? all BBs that before had Ranges over 20 km cap at 20? Or Should the current range difference be kept? dito 16 to 17km? it would hit BBs differently and possibly destroy advantages of different BBs... with this i mean: Japanese BBs normaly have better range and precision but worse armour... Tier X being exception)... so forcing them into more CQC might give the US BBs an advantage... then what is with Cruisers that (theoretically) could reach these ranges? Should they by the range cut affected too? for me it seems more like a cry like "NERF CARRIERS DONT CARE HOW" "BBs are dying" blablabla with a few ideas thrown in between but no real rework concepts

wer redet denn daovn? Ich Rede von IN ECHT... die Scharnhorst ist ein Schlachtschiff, das zum KOntern der Schlachtschiffe der Dunkerque klasse gebaut wurde... nach dem 1. Weltkrieg ist die Grenze zwischen den englischen "Schwachgepanzerten" (das hat sich geändert... da ham se sich n beispiel an den dt. genommen) aber schnellen Schlachtkreuzern udnd en Schlachtschiffen wie der QE (wenn man eigentlich schon die SMS Derfflinger etc. dazu zählen KÖNNTE) stark verwischt... im Grunde liefs größtenteils darauf raus das es nur noch "Schnelle Schlachtschiffe" gab... und auch wenn die Scharnhrost nur 28er hatte warn die in der Lage es fast mit den britischen 38ern bis 20km aufzunehmen

opinion read and ignored... i myself get "burned down" rather seldomly...the most annyoing was cross fire between a Kiev and a Blys with NO cruisers nearby thinking "maybe we should help" but instead went "mine mine mine" on targets rougly 15km or so away from them... oh and the time i had the Kutuzow at 6 to 8km and all my hits only ovepenned him (maybe a hand full of normal pens) while he kited me down with HE... it took i think 4 to 5 minutes that the kutuzow died... also... how SHOULD they counter cruisers? BB duty description in the loading screen is "Destroy enemy targets with fire from the main battery"... which seems like an accurate description of how to counter cruisers with BBs... and to use your words "Jesus, we get it, a mean, evil and cowardly BB sat back while the cruisers and DDs were to busy with taking out anything but Destroyers... Admit that there simply are captains that think "why should i play DMG pinhata for idiots that wont help me when i need help" see how easily this kind of style can be turned around? Cutting the range, especially fi done the Wrong way, either wont change anything or fill the forum with floods of complainment because the BBs would die for real this time... cuttin gthe range on slow BBs would screw them over even more... while most japanese BBs dont have the same armour as the the german or US ones which actually are ment to "brawl"... the Kongo at best has 203mms of Armour... if we'd go with the idea of cutting its range to 16km that would mean the NY would easily be in Range UNLESS it gets the same cut on range, whcih would mean that it could be that it can be outragned by some cruisers... which would mean that it... well... have Kawachi VS cruisers with 11km or so range and see what happens...

interesting... i see this movements with cruisers that like to let me alone with 3 enemy cruisers 1 bb and 2 dds when i'm at the front in my BBs... so... well aside the idiocy of goin to the border first... they prefer to charge in, let the BB crawl behind AND THEN bugger off when the BB is getting into combat

considering that the pen force often contributes to huge amounts of overpens on broadisiding Cruisers adn even other battleships cause screwed up mechanics, the big guns being shotguns and the armour in parts being negated by HE spamming... (just read in regards of the normalization overhaul that one guy with a NM tried to go up against a Fuso with AP:.. his AP failed miserably... the Fuso BURNT him down... i can see a problem here...) yes BBs have advantages over cruisers... but according to WGs Rock Scissor paper they also ARE MENT to counter Cruisers... while they have advantages they also have disadvantages: for the most part slower (even if later on not that mcuh anymore), long reload so no overall rain of fire, bad precision, big and therefore easy to hit target... often comparable slow turrets which makes it difficult for them to adjust to enemies from the other side... big turning circles (Großer Kurfürst will have over 1km...)

Sie ist aber kein Schlachtkreuzer... USA sagen: Schlachtschiff, Großbritannien, nach dem Krieg: SChlachtschiff... Kriegsmarine? Bingo... Schlachtschiff... aber mal ganz ehrlich... wer auch immer bei WG denkt dass das die beste idee seit ever is gehört einmal Kielgeholt... unter der H-42 äh entschuldigung "Großer Kurfürst" durch... von Bug nach heck... viel Spaß... "wir releasen die dinge rso spät wie möglcih damit mach ma [edited]schotter )))))))))"... nicht mit dem miesen hype aufbau... bei Witcher Blood & wine war ich 3 Monate vor Release im Grunde jeden Tag mehr mals am googlen nach neuen infos und hab mir das ältere Zeug nochmal angeschaut... hier? Kaum häppchen für Hype aufrechterhaltung seitens der Devs... keine Kleinen "Teaser" Schiffe... z.B. König Albert wär dafür prädestiniert gewesen... Nein.. es gibt NICHTS es gibt die "KRasny Krim" die scheinbar mist ist und im Bezug auf deutsche Schlachter vollkommen uninteressant... ich frag mich ob ich das Geld nciht einfach für irgendwas anderes rausballern soll.. und das ist nicht der "Sinn" von Hype... Hype soll dafür sorgen das sich Leute mit Geld denken "DAFÜR! UND FÜR NICHTS ANDERES!!!" Ich finde grad einfach nur nichts anderes...