Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Major_Damage225

Beta Tester
  • Content Сount

    2,875
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    7295
  • Clan

    [HMSR]

Everything posted by Major_Damage225

  1. Major_Damage225

    Bringing Kitakami back - with deepwater torpedos

    I havent read that book, so untill i get a copy i will conclude that the author made a mistake/error concerning Kitakami, one can never know for sure though what the IJN had on the drawing board since most of the info got burned/destroyed at the end of the war. I'll look around a bit though, mabe i can find something.
  2. Major_Damage225

    Bringing Kitakami back - with deepwater torpedos

    where did you get 11 quad tubes? where is the 11th? havent seen that version on any preliminary designs yet. Edit: Ive seen one preliminary (idk how serious it was) wirh 10x5 533mm torps but none with 11x 4 Long Lance torps, i'll try to find it.
  3. Major_Damage225

    IJN Asashio Revisited (In Preview Mk. 2)

    In Harekaze im comftorbe drilling a Kiev a new one, you'd be surprised at the ammount off DD's panik when you go ape on them, they dont expect it, shock therapy works
  4. Major_Damage225

    IJN Asashio Revisited (In Preview Mk. 2)

    The only IJN DD i felt the guns can be used as a offence tool (not counting Harekaze) was the old Fubuki, on all others i tend to use them only for last resort defence, kiting purposes or as a fire starter (unless a low hp ship is in range) idk maby im doing it wrong but thats just me
  5. Major_Damage225

    IJN Asashio Revisited (In Preview Mk. 2)

    I wish WG would give kageros regular torps this preformance but with 1.3 detectability instead of 0.7, heck all ijn dd's from t8 onward. But thats just dreams
  6. Major_Damage225

    New game mechanic

    Well i took the bait, gj , you know whats the funny part..... It wouldnt surprise me at all if would be actually implemented
  7. I havent quite figured Spee out yet tbh, sometimes i feel it can tank Yamato shells othertimes i think a Tachibana can rip it a new one through the nose.
  8. Major_Damage225

    Varyag T3 Cruiser in ST

    I had a interesting though pop into my bean, since now we have a few protected cruisers and a Mikasa, wouldn it be a neat thing to add a operation purely for these ships? Would make sence me thinks, what do ya'll think?
  9. Diference in armor, both Hood and Scharnhorst have more belt armor than Khronstad&Stalingrad, Graf Spee has 11inch guns but thin armor soo CA slot
  10. Major_Damage225

    Varyag T3 Cruiser in ST

    Soo the third protected cruiser joins Aurora and Diana, WG really pumping out the prems lately.
  11. Major_Damage225

    Soviet battlesh... cruiser Kronshtadt

    100% confirmed, in patch 0.7.5, after the US split and before the IJN split, you also get a free T5 IJN Kitakami when the split happenes.
  12. Major_Damage225

    Bringing Kitakami back - with deepwater torpedos

    There fixed it for you XD She was super easy to citadel X3
  13. Major_Damage225

    Soviet battlesh... cruiser Kronshtadt

    Soo TX is stalingrad for CW, and this is for everyone else who wont be able to get Stalingrad and will be for FXP? Or did i miss anything.
  14. Major_Damage225

    Bringing Kitakami back - with deepwater torpedos

    Well the official answer was that she was too riski, mostly for the team she was in, too many TK's etc. She was shelved till further notice, until the figure out how to implement her in sutch a way that woul work, how long that may take noone knows, least there was no more news about her from WG devs.
  15. So since we are getting the big gunned heavy cruiser Stalingrad, the question is where are the USN and IJN ones, the USS Alaska and IJN Ishikari? WG it's time to say something. Please discuss the heavy hitter's of the cruiser world, one is coming so the other Navy's versions should aswell.
  16. Major_Damage225

    Big Gunned Heavy Cruisers Discussion Thread.

    You'r right there, the tubes would be like on Kii, stern bellow deck, just hopefully not with Senjo's arks but Kii's arks
  17. Major_Damage225

    Bringing Kitakami back - with deepwater torpedos

    Trust me WG knows this, problem is people not knowing how to use sutch a ship, that's why it's not in game.
  18. Major_Damage225

    Bringing Kitakami back - with deepwater torpedos

    Kitakitty is only realy usefull for area denial, if she survives more than a few minutes, i remeber in CBT when she got spotted everyone and theyr mother in law focused it imediatly, that said id still love to have her since i missed it back then, for colection purposes of course
  19. Major_Damage225

    Bringing Kitakami back - with deepwater torpedos

    I would like to see Kitakami back personaly, but there would have to be serioust restrictions on who can get her. She could be a ship that can switch between DW torps and regular ones ingame. But as i said, serioust restriction on who can skipper her, be it a prior to purchase/aqirement you have some sort of test to take or a skill based filter. She got pulled for a reason, today having clueless players with her.... ouch... wouldnt end well, basicly 90% of the time she'd just take a ship slot, meaning the team with her would be playing with one ship less from the start. It would be fun though to be able to play her in traning room for the lulz.
  20. Tbh, it would be funny if it werent true
  21. Major_Damage225

    Sea stars?

    Lower the bar again, to where... i thought it was already on the floor
  22. Major_Damage225

    Sea stars?

    soo he has two stars and blows his mouth off... facepalm.
  23. Major_Damage225

    A-140 F3 as a Replacement to Izumo

    As mutch as it would be nice to have a super Kongo, i doubt it's going to be ingame, maby when/if the IJN BB line gets split as a TX on the alternate line, but thats years away, if at all. Edit: Did you know the no13 class was sometimes refered to as the Mikasa class.
  24. Major_Damage225

    Frivolous Chaos

    12v12 Okhotnik anyone, torp only
×