Prospect_b

Never understood why that song is such a laughing stock, I quite like it

I'm no native English speaker - I meant "cheating" as "mismanaging", "misquoting" or whatever in this context, as reply to where you obviously implied that I "mismanaged" or "misrepresented" something. And even though I am indeed no native English speaker, that would certainly fall in the denotative meaning of "cheating". So you can go mock yourself maybe? You must be willingly blind here. I am not pointing out a single stat. You are however defending the winrate of your GC by saying your Normandie has even higher. I mean, why not go to your South Carolina, which has even higher? Some parts of the general picture, however: - You have consistently (over 250 battles with gc) higher than 60% winrate, in a tier which is notoriously famous for its shitty matchmaking. - In her you outdamage the tier 5,6,7 and 8 US BBs. Only at tier 9, the Iowa, you beat her avg dmg with a staggering 4K - You keep referring to your Normandie, although you have the same avg dmg in her as in your Lyon, which implies you just had some exceptional games in her in too small of a statistically valid sample Look. I understand you have a favorite toy - but at least have some decency and stop pretending she is just fine.

Seriously, I didn't even look at those. What I pasted was the warships.today listing of your battleships on their default sorting, i.e. by number of games. Your Lyon games can't have been a lot since they fell off the first page. It is quite telling that in order to defend yourself you have to go as far as to imply that I am cheating with those numbers...

1. admits it is second most played ship - but that is just because it is so fun ,right? 2. here is your BBs. Find something that stands out? - Cause I do...

Yea, we already figured out the captain of those ships has no skills.

Yes, yes it is indeed.

He meant "radaring torps" = impossible. Torps can be detected by hydro(phones) aka sonar, not radar which can only detect surface vessels. Is it possible you climbed the tiers a bit too fast?

well... how shall I explain this? "last two days" means the last two days, including today. So those game were played today, i.e. 16/07 and yesterday, 15/07 of the year of the lord 2018. for "last 751" I'm gonna let you do the math, because I think you could use some homework...

hmm, I hate to be that guy but If I go check the 2 most "recent" colums on https://eu.warships.today/player/500007896/MassiveDYT for your gearing last 751 days: 404 gearing games: 47.03% winrate: 44K avg dmg vs "new tactics" in last 2 days: 21 gearing games: 28.5% winrate: 34K avg dmg So I'm gonna bet you're not gonna find a lot of converts here...

All tier 8s, and imho nothing at tier 8 is worth it, except for the lo yang in your situation (& hypothetically the kutuzov) The legendary missions are gonna keep even more people playing tier tens for quite a substantial amount of time. If you really don't care about being uptiered most of the time, don't mind me then.

I've hated GC since the day it came out, and the moment WG started to pretend there is absolutely nothing wrong here, was for me the ultimate reason never to trust any single word they utter again. Yup, I know the joys of t5 mm. But, a while ago I redid some lines on NA, and found some low tiers (real low, like 1-5) to be very fun. I think everyone should rebuy something like a kuma or karlsruhe, and see what happens when you'll meet that GC, especially since a lot of the low tier maps are quite horrid. Such effing fun. And yeah, I know that specific GC is "lucky" to be top tier, cause most times he'll be uptiered, but that's where he frigging belongs. But that's speaking about that specific GC. As the ship itself is very popular, cause OP as hell, you'll meet them a lot. The only thing that can comfort me is knowing that it will have driven off quite some players from the game. Thx for visualizing those details @wilkatis_LV - I am very curious if some of the WG ppl you hailed will answer.

A game @El2aZeR and me had last week on Okinawa, he in Fletcher, me in Alsace we start in the reject positions, so El2a tries for a sneak cap, and I go B line like an imbecil because I hate getting screwed by spawns, and you never know who I might surprise +- 5 minutes into the game, I did the naughty with the Neptune there (front guns only, gotta be economic with the ammo ), El2a with the shima. Our tier ten BBs, who spawned at B, who until then were following me (from a safe distance...), decide it is time to go back to their starting positions... +- 10 minutes into the game Our BBs are back at their starting positions, and found a target: the Red DDs that are fleeing towards the border. Cause that's what BBs do, right? Seconds before the game ends The hunt for the red DDs has concluded. We know their location. Yeay. The montana at least somewhere saw the light and aborted... So, besides our "debatable" BBs, very very speshul mention has to go out towards those 2 red dds, who went for the "m m must flank" tactic and ended up border humping, while leaving the capping to their cruisers.

Saw the thread & tried. Can connect...

I'm gonna play along here for a second. I don't know too much about this war, but when I looked it up it was the Belgrano who was torped, with over 300 lives lost, over half of the total Argentinian deaths in the war. Conqueror sustained no damage. Why the hell are you whining about this? If at some point that conqueror submarine would be implemented in the game, I would - in some sense - understand why Argentinians would object to that. Or as it is, US people complaining about Kaga or Shokaku being in the game because of Pearl Harbour or whatever so called still felt national tragedy. But this? Wtf...

Very bad analogy. Cause "even" in fourth division, those teammates of Messi understand the game. He doesn't have to deal with teammates shooting the ball in their own goal, a keeper going to an extended trip to the bathroom in the middle of the game, and explaining them constantly (in vain) not to grab the ball with their gluey hands.

It is just WG enforcing their pay2progress scheme some more. Truth is, every tier 5 cruiser atm is extremely weak, just by the good grace of the matchmaking that will make you face scharnhorsts, lyons & belfasts 80% of the time. A lot of them are weak regardless of that consideration and deserve a buff. Someone mentioned guilio Cesare. Well that ship is broken as fck - and I even have heared people defending that just because of the matchmaking. But that ship is for them monies, so WG doesn't see problems there. Next nerf might be a little "buff" to her armour scheme to avoid the almost guaranteed overpenning - so she too can be food for the glorious masterrace.

High entertainment values - I approve. Do continue guys. Please.

if you think you have seen everything, here is a CV player in the haku @El2aZeR and me met today He was not botting in the haku, but I am quite certain he botted all the way up there.

Well then that opinion mattered nothing, since that change has been implemented in live anyway. They could have just asked the question on the live server, once it was implemented, the same way they do with the "were you satisfied with this game" questions...

True. Though pollers/marketeers take very serious precautions to have a representative portion of the population examined. That is why, in general, polls have value. If it is dependent upon PTS ppl that filled in some poll then, WG just pulled those totally random numbers, and weighed them for far more than they are worth. But that's WG I guess, all hail RNGebus.

Belfast doesn't have torps though...

No His name is very similar to "top kek" though...

I concur. @MrConway what is the purpose of this deception?

You mean like this gem of a player that I had on my team as midway a while ago. While enemy team had absolutejustice & 2 of his buds... Bestest fun ever

eh? What did they change?