-
Content Сount
2,655 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
14214 -
Clan
[HU-SD]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Prospect_b
-
they did it by saying they did, duh
-
Why did you say previously that the name "skill gap" was (used to be) inappropriate? Anyway, you're essentially saying that as long as carriers aren't a "decisive unit", that the skill gap isn't a problem. Sure. But you seem to believe that carriers aren't a decisive unit (anymore), and that's where I disagree.
-
1. 2. 1 & 2 are contradictory. You'll have way more opportunities of making credits when uptiered. Doesn't necessarily mean it's going to be fun.
-
You should check out that reddit thread, it's nothing but - that's work in progress - it's on our list of possible things to add - we're looking into it - we are thinking about the possibility (of..) etc I'd rather have your first option, the golden silence.
-
that guy is bloody famous I've been discussing him with el2a - we didn't reach an agreement on what it was. My guess is someone either very very young or (more likely) very very old, as in 70+ edit: he improved close to 10% on his haku pre- versus post rework though
-
If that's your "impression", then I'll advice you the same as I did for @L0V3_and_PE4CE: take less drugs. Anyway, open a random carrier page on wowstats and sort 1. on battles played 2. on winrate (both descending & ascending) - here's on for the haku: https://wows-numbers.com/ship/4179605200,Hakuryu/?order=battles__desc#leaderboard You see already ppl with hundreds upon hundreds of games, with glorious 28-40% winrates. Yes, there are bbs etc with the same wr, but they're not dragging their team with them, or at least certainly not to the same extent. Which, as I said earlier, gives the exact same situation one could have in RTS: you have the 34% braindead and they have the 70% superscum? Might as well go back to port. Not being able to shoot down planes with fighters changed nothing, as (once again) @El2aZeR predicted correctly.
-
- skillgap is no problem, as long as it isn't too wide - current skillgap width is "just about right, but close to the border (of too large)" wow. 10/10 for newspeak Also: muhahaha. Having a decent CV vs potato one is probably back at the state where it was in rts - i.e. you should go back to port instead of wasting 15 minutes of time.
-
I had the warning once, last week, but that was in my "own made" wine configuration. The "normal" client (i.e. through steam) never gave me that one, so you should be fine like that.
-
If you have the one with el2a going after two seattles, pm it to me on discord plz.
-
? What's wrong? I watched one yesterday.
-
Meh. While theoretically true, this hasn't been a teamgame in ages, and since most people know that it is cumbersome (and somewhat futile) to send fighters, I'm quite glad I don't have to waste time doing *whatever teamwork could imply" to assist some nitwits. Not saying that that isn't extremely sad, but it's just how it is now (and since a long time or even forever?) - and I know you know that :) Also, you never know what they'll do with the "support CVs". Maybe they'll have an option to send out first person fighters to hunt planes. That would make that line extremely "cockblocky", so I'd say there is a good chance of that happening.
-
that's a real word!? https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/stoppage Ok then. At least I learned something here.
-
Well, I didn't say that it doesn't do anything. I just said it was expensive AF :P If it were up to me, there would be an option in the "training" room, where one would be able to activate a "show where to aim" option, so people could learn properly (and also be encouraged to stay away from idiot tools like the one you referred to). But as where I trust WG somewhat to do smt about cheating, I've now entered the domain of "educating your playerbase" - so that's not gonna happen.
-
LOL that is a test version. The real one is to buy and sells for $16/month Are you sure you are not just advertizing here @naked_bird ?
-
Is that so? I don't really know how long the average player needs to play those tier fours to get to the next, but I'm gonna guess it's quite a few - like close to 40?
-
If you think you would be able to save that game by bringing an asashio, you urgently need to bring your drug abuse down, mr hippie
-
second game If someone can explain me the rules for reimbursement of purchased good, that would be appreciated
-
first game obviously too weak a ship, can't carry all these braindeads even as top tier
-
Yes, yes I did (my first premium buy in over a year :D ) @El2aZeR, get online please - I might need your assistance
-
Yea that's what I said indeed... Anyway, I can understand whining about CV rework. But me and this playerbase went separate ways when they whined so hard that they made WG decide not to touch premium boats a few months ago. Hence why I am fundamentally unable to take whiners seriously when they talk about balancing. Hence why I am genuinely entertained that something like Enterprise can not be (individually) nerfed.
-
But all little whiners here that whine against CVs also whined their little whiney as*es off when WG dared to touch the realm of "nerfing premiums". It's nice seeing them dig their own grave, isn't it? Also, Audacious RFs are great against DDs too, and those aren't up in the nerf list? Oh, but RN CVS are still pretty new, so a lot of ppl still grinding them. Oh, that's a lot of potential FreeXP customers.
-
* and is willing to play the s*show that is tier 8.
-
Then why first refer to wtr/pr, with is a stat that takes all games into consideration, and not only recent ones. Cause you can't feel like a "besserwisser" then? (at least until you find someone who knows what to look for in your glorious stats?) Then why not stick with your old account then? Could have saved you some euro's too. Nope, no one by that name registered.
-
I am trash though, since I'm not "clever" enough to reroll :/
-
No, those are from the other guy, as in the one under whose response they are written. Hard to mistake them for a reroll as yours.
