-
Content Сount
770 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
743
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by Outlawz0111
-
Pretty sure you are up to scratch on the credits issues as many people have contributed to helping you but i just wanted to quickly pitch in. I have strictly been playing operation aegis and have been making a good profit without a premium account, but if you do indeed get a bad team those profits will quickly turn into a minus if you get a defeat, unless you managed to do very well in my case over 100k damage and carrying hard only got me 623 measly credits for that defeat although not sure maybe a bit more credits but still my contribution was not fairly awarded. I was using my tier 6 japanese cruiser the aoba for the majority of the time and i had two rentals the graf spee and the warspite, both of which didn't really impress me but still gave a profit. If you can put up with the great european randoms of which i will not then i would actually recommend you do those more but expect to go up against seasoned veterans and endure some horrific teams . Final verdict is if you want PVE fun and wish to make a good profit in tier 6's you really can not go wrong with operations. Just make sure to rack up the damage and help your team out along the way. Take care cheers .
-
You get to play only 1 ship in 2019! Which one it is ?
Outlawz0111 replied to imElitez's topic in General Discussion
KMS Tirpitz no question about that. She is just a marvel of german engineering. -
Infestation of destroyers is becoming somewhat very frustrating!.
Outlawz0111 posted a topic in Archive
I'm not sure if many agree with me but having each match infested with higher tier destroyers is becoming very frustrating indeed. I'm not sure im going to stick around much longer playing world of warships as it would appear every time i return after some months theirs a new meta that's potentially breaking game balance. I would like to make it perfectly clear destroyers are not OP, its simply the amount of them every match is turning games into pure frustration for me. I think most has been mentioned already, but i am hoping wargaming find some fix or common ground. I really do love this game and its developers, supertesters, and everyone else!, but something needs doing about this chaps . I bid you farewell, i shall be getting torpedoed in my poor tirpitz by infested matches of destroyers . -
I am somewhat frustrated with the amount of destroyers in matches i must admit. The meta has shifted it would somewhat seem?. Wargaming just need to asses the statistics and come up with data to adjust things.
-
If you see me in the game i can assure you 99% of the time i will be playing the mighty tirpitz!.
-
I have also completed stage two and i have only been awarded the commander.
-
They share similarities but the tirpitz is meant as a collector gem as its probably a tad better then its counterpart coming in the future but that's a guess. Plus dont forget, by having the mighty tirpitz we can train our commanders up very fast maximizing effectiveness in future battles .
-
I actually need to find two other fellow tirpitz players to get on teamspeak talking about OP divisions lol .
-
£35 actually for the tirpitz on its own is very good i got it no dent in my bank at all. I really could not resist this ship shes a beauty, im buying the model kit for her also next week ;).
-
Please help captains with my stuttering issue on the AMD Radeon R9 390X.
Outlawz0111 posted a topic in General Discussion
Dear fellow captains, I have finally returned to the glorious shores of world of warships and installed it on my newly built computer, however im getting a very weird stutter all of a sudden sadly. I'm running the game on an Intel Core i7 5930K @ 4.3GHz, 16GB's of DDR4 Memory, and an AMD Radeon R9 390X!. The stuttering appears to happen when im using the zoom scrolling in and out of shots, and strangely when im zooming out to view my surroundings. It's greatly effecting my gameplay captains, very very annoying and somewhat distracting. I would greatly appreciate any help with this issue. I hope all fellow captains have a wonderful day!. -
Please help captains with my stuttering issue on the AMD Radeon R9 390X.
Outlawz0111 replied to Outlawz0111's topic in General Discussion
I appreciate what you're saying, but it could be a host of issues unrelated to the AMD drivers. I have run diagnostics and my internet appears to have some packet loss but not enough to warrant a sudden micro stutter weirdly. I do plan on replacing my R9 390X in about 5-6 months but im unsure as to if it would be worth it because most games i play are partnered with AMD anyway so getting an nvidia graphics card may be a bad idea respectfully. -
Please help captains with my stuttering issue on the AMD Radeon R9 390X.
Outlawz0111 replied to Outlawz0111's topic in General Discussion
Thank you i will get round to running it. The issue for me appears to be more so when doing fast actions actually, turning the camera fast or somewhat zooming in and out very fast causes the stuttering. I'm leaning towards AMD's drivers being the issue to be fair, i never had any stuttering on my previous Nvidia graphics card. Whatever it is i really need a solution as its highly annoying!. Cheers . -
Congratulations on that incredible prize sir!.
-
Although a lovely ship i would rather just grind the actual german BB line when it makes an appearance for free. I already have a lot of premium ships as i got the bundle in the early stages of the games development.
-
I am happy staying at the back somewhat while the game plays out to analyse what im dealing with and i make tactically sound decisions. I have many times went in the front with cruisers and been torped like crazy or sunk very fast by enemy concentrated fire. Most battleships players will stay at the back depending upon situation.
-
Lets be honest respectfully, A ship that either is going slow speed or standing still IRL that would be an easy drop for plane crews correct ?. A moving target fair enough, but when i see a DD has stopped moving and i send my dive bombers to intercept him hoping they will actually hit him when he has low Hp's they completely miss, and that miss caused my full HP carrier to get sunk and fair play to the DD player. Sometimes though, they have such a massive target like BB's and they still manage to miss a big target like that ?. Now captains, i get that we cant expect dive bombers to hit all the time, but they need to be represented fairly in WOWS as right now they are not really fun to play IMO captains. I'm exceptionally tired sorry, its been a long day i apologise that i have not written up a longer more explained post but i hope that you can see what im trying say captains about dive bombers!. We must get a fix soon for dive bombers so they have better hit chances on bigger targets and those that are standing still . Good day to fellow captains!. Catch you all later on when i wake up.
-
what's happened to this game? :(
Outlawz0111 replied to Philipp_ab_exterminatore's topic in General Discussion
Thank you for being honest. Theirs a clear lack of people wanting to choose anything else but attacker load outs currently which is making games incredibly boring and repetitive for carrier players. Theirs also the issue of US fighters being able to fundamentally obliterate Japanese fighters within seconds of them engaging each other!. I think carriers should be more fun, in terms of how so hard to say. Possibly both carrier factions should have fun load outs and the possibility to choose scouting aircraft over a more heavy attacker load out for instance ?. Being able to spot ships early in the game with my scout planes from my carrier and for that to give a nice reward would be fun but would it fly would be the question ?. Your thoughts ? . -
what's happened to this game? :(
Outlawz0111 replied to Philipp_ab_exterminatore's topic in General Discussion
I must agree that carries need a serious overhaul or else i fear in the next 5-6 months we may hardly see anyone playing them at all. Wargaming need to do something fast, their was a huge amount of carrier players during the beta stages and now we rarely see any at all since wargaming choose to basically inappropriately rebalance them wrongly. Here is hoping wargaming actually make the right choice, as im almost on my tier 7 japanese carrier!. If they do intend to rebalance carriers making them more fun, i would be incredibly thankful as carriers are my personal fav. Another issue is the rapidly falling playerbase. As someone mentioned previously they have lost thousands of players over some months now and its continuing to fall. They must act fast or else i fear we may have a very serious issue. -
The upgrades varied anyway, Proposed Modifications What follows is a list of the proposed work: New internal machinery and improved subdivision. It was desirable to upgrade and relocate engines and boilers. Alternatively, at a minimum the boilers would be replaced. Rearranged/remodelled torpedo bulges and side armour. Most likely the side bulges would have been extended to the top of the 7" armour belt rather than to the top of the 12" belt. Improved deck armour/protection over vital areas. Removal of armoured conning tower and the 5" side armour. New superstructure and masts fore and aft. Most notably, the forward superstructure would have been a "block" type similar to that of Renown, the Queen Elizabeths or the King George Vs (KGV). New funnels. These would have been something similar to those on Renown as KGV funnels would have been too small. Addition of a catapult, dual hangars and Walrus seaplanes. (See "Some Considerations" below) Improved antiaircraft (AAA) protection. This would include the removal of all existing weaponry and replacement with a total of 6 Mark M eight-barreled pom poms and lastly, the addition of either 12-16 x 5.25" guns (same type as KGV) or 16 x 4.5" (same type as Renown). Of course, the ship would likely have also received updated 0.5" machine guns and multiple 40mm mounts. (See "Some Considerations" below) Upgraded fire control. She would have received updated radar, fire control tables, comms, directors, etc. Extended forecastle deck. Hood's stern was notoriously wet due to her overweight condition. An extension was considered for the simple fact that it might help keep the quarterdeck a bit drier. The extension would retain the rough "V" shape but would instead, extend to "X" turret. (See "Some Considerations" below).
-
Depends if they add the hood with her upgraded decks and refined guns or the box standard hood which was completely inferior to the likes of the bismark for instance.
-
Discriminating flags Kriegs marine Iron cross VS IJN rising sun
Outlawz0111 replied to lobsterden's topic in General Discussion
Theirs mods that add everything you want just install them. I have mods that are using the proper historic flags on my ships . -
Check out the current NA contest (free Mikasa for everyone on NA)
Outlawz0111 replied to ShockPirat's topic in General Discussion
Wargaming EU need to start doing something fast as the playerbase is falling. -
The consequences where mentioned in the early alpha about adding the russians before the british but it was ignored. We now have a rapidly falling playerbase and WG cant do anything about it unless they start doing good specials and some kind of incentive to keep its players happy. I got abuse for saying this a while ago, but i think the British and Germans should have come first as those navies are the most widely known of WW2 and coming in after the United States & Japan, and the rest followed on suite obviously. I'm patiently waiting for the british carriers to come. They are my only real interest as im a pure carrier player with the odd DD game ;).
-
Respectfully noted. My issue is that for my contribution i got a low score. I managed to stop many torpedo runs on freindly battleships by killing over 36 aircraft!.
-
For instance, That's my point.
