Outlawz0111

Those damned things!.

The japanese carriers need fixing because in lower tiers the US carriers absolutely rip their planes to shreds. I just had a match in my tier 5 jap carrier, sent two torp bombers to the left and one torp & dive bomber to the right, within 2 minutes my squads on left got obliterated, a minute later or so my other right squads got a heavy beating, returned to ship and already my squads are 75% gone. I actually asked for help from my team and they insulted me, most of em. I sent out my last planes and the damned US fighters were waiting for me and i did absolutely nothing that match and its been like this a lot, sometimes i get good games, but only when theirs no US carrier on enemy team!.

Low tiers suck for both factions but the US get the better DD's are tier 9 & 10.

The US fighters seem to be able to utterly shred whole squads of japanese planes down exceptionally easily. I am not sure why theirs such a difference but its becoming very irritating to start a match plot your route and have US attackers come and shred you up and they do it very very quickly almost inhumanly. The japanese carriers can be fun but having all those torp planes just looks like an xp and credit pinata for the US carrier players. I have just this second actually started to grind the US line as i prefer an attacker load out something the japanese do not have which is very strange. Is it just me captains ?. I'm finding it hard to play matches at the moment in my jap carriers.

25 torpedo hits later and 162 thousand damage in my hosho and we stall end up drawing!. (These teams are so bad i could cry). Shame they have not implemented the replay system yet im to lazy to edit the files.

Did you check my screen Trouble ?. As you can see from just 3-4 minutes, took me ages to launch all my torp bombers the US attackers destroyed 75% of all 3 squads!. Now i get that sometimes strange things happen, but the screen is here for the proof i am not just saying this .

This is not a whine. I provided a screen for proof, only 3-4 minutes into the game i had lost 75% of my whole planes combined and when i got them out again i lost the rest and had only did 2 torp hits, luck ones because a BB player went out on his own and i caught him but he evaded my manual drop well!.

Did you see the screenshot ?. The point is how fast they shoot them down i lost almost all 3 of my torp bombers within the first 2-3 minutes into the game the US carrier just shredded them.

UK here the game does jump a bit and sometimes the sound can bug but not having many issues on talk talk fibre optic 36mb/s.

Just been in two matches where it was 2v1, me against two other carriers. My first game ended up with all my planes killed in 2-3 minutes as both carriers zerg rush my planes. The second match ended in 2 minutes exactly, the enemy carriers just zerg rush my carrier and kill me i had no chance to evade, react, because he killed my fighters pretty quickly. Both games we lost badly, its unbalanced and quite frustrating especially when some of the team insult you for asking for help. Please end 2v1 carrier matches a lot of fellow captains would appreciate that i am sure of it. I have added a poll for the divine community! .

Considering 3 of us where left to fight almost the whole enemy team at the end.

Adding more AA in those battles would kill carriers off entirely. Tier 4 & 5 should remain as they are its just the match making that needs changing its making the battles unfair for the most part.

The langley can easily kill the IJN Hosho attackers in tier 4 and it has better torp spread but indeed in tier 5 both the Hosho and Langley are worthless especially if you are in a 2v1 scenario.

The chap above you may have some good points but in every 2v1 the team with the most carriers always won due to the fact they could torp more BB's in a shorter space of time.

Just because you are good at carriers does not mean they are OP. I suck at carriers, but that does not mean they are underpowered does it ?.

Unfortunately it seems the loadouts are rather limited at the moment. Getting into a tier 5 game in your tier 4 CV meeting a bogue for instance, that vessels fighters can rip your planes up to shreds even with a good crew and module loadout your fighters do not stand a chance and your torpedo bombers even less so. It would be very nice to choose a fighter heavy loadout on my japanese carriers, especially the low tier CV's, that would solve the issue of getting into lets say.. a tier 5 match in my hosho and having the bogue rip my squadrons to shreds. Atleast i have more attackers and can be useful to my team and stop his torpedeo bombers while trying to fight off his attacker!. What do you fellow captains think ? .

And to add insult to injury im pretty dam sure the zero - zeroes had a very weak construction ?. You know come to think of it i actually probably read something and based my facts on a book not a great idea if the writer of the book alters the events dam it!.

No further wipes unless someone breaks something and for that im afraid its the gulag.

I cant wait to play the spanish navy if they do come that will be fun.

Did i misread the thread because sometimes i can do that unintentionally ?. Well anyway good night all carrier fans and see you all in morning im sure ectar will have fun tomorrow waking up to 1 thousand whines hehe.

The post below is based off something i read not actual facts. The loss of life and damages from zeroes plunging into ships was a lethal tactic in the battle of pearl harbour. While some torpedoes did hit the mark and sink some ships the zeroes caused the most carnage. The pilots would aim to crash into supposed parts of the ship that would cause severe damage and thus it was a very cunning tactic by the imperial japanese fleet command. Of course that is my own opinion and im not the only one but many obviously consider torpedoes the bigger threat in the battle of pearl harbour hehe. I love carriers so much i could talk about them all day, in fact next week im going to look around for some models and build the hosho if i can find a kit!. Greets, and good night orlunu.

WW1 Ships & Pre WW2 ships where always poorly equipped with AA except some rare instances of course due to the fact that air superiority tactics where used later in world war 2, that is when ships began refits and housed more AA onto them. Carriers are working as intended, well..., most of them are. If you really do have an issue with them i suggest you provide feedback in the appropriate section but be warned ectar will not take a whine as feedback in all due respects so you will need to word it better. From the games i have personally played the carriers are not unstoppable i think thats a bit exaggerated on your part sir. Games that are chucked together giving one team 2 carriers and the other 1 needs to stop though that part if you where trying to say that i fully agree. I would want a limit on other classes if CV's get that treatment though theirs plenty other instances at hand not just CV MM issues.

Good attack aircraft on tier 4 yes but easy prey for the bogue in tier 5.

I have to say i hope they actually add variation to the planes you have also. As mentioned ammunition or choice of torpedo like faster but lower damage, slower but higher damage etc. The main issue i have is that in my fabulous hosho when im sitting in a tier 5 match with a USN carrier a tier higher his attackers literally shred my planes like they are paper. I just hope wargaming can somehow sort this issue out and the loadouts as previously mentioned. And now ... Suicide planes, they were more deadly than torpedoes, (Outlawz is very tired)... at pearl harbour the planes did massive damages to the deck, ton of fires, massive amount of loss of life on US ships can we dream ?.

Great post but it wont stop them from whining.