MudMonkey

SoonTM

Just play low tier DDs (Isokaze or Minekaze). They earn very decent money.

I agree. Domination is most of the time when I play it frustrating. I understand that winning is important in a game. But for me fun is more important to be honest.

Ich gebe dir absolut recht, OP. Ich hoffe nur, dass du auch diejenigen erreichst, die es betrifft. Ich fürchte nämlich, dass die nicht so oft das Forum besuchen.

Quite funny first post, dude. Nevertheless, welcome to the forum. Firstly I would like to answer you post with referring to (my) post right above yours. Secondly I raise with this one: "If you want to fill em with air, bomb em. If you want to fill em with water, torpedo em."

So, lets just imagine you guys get what you want and those secondaries are under player control. That would still not include the accuracy. So on the one hand you will gain control over it, but I am pretty sure that on the other hand you will hit less than your up-to-now on-board aimbot for the secondaries. As I have watched a lot of people being overwhelmed by fireing their main guns AND steering at the same time, I doubt that it will contribute a lot if you overflow their mind with even another option.

Ich habe hier ein schönes Video aus einem anderm Post gefunden Wie es scheint sind gerade die US DDs besonders anfällig für kritische Treffer auch wenn man sich hier auf die tier 10 bezieht so denke ich doch mal, dass das auch für die anderen tiers zutrifft.

Dude. Always keep in mind that this is an arcade game. Every ship has its purpose. Destroyers hunt BBs and prey on easy targets with hit and run, BBs main targets are CAs, CAs main targets are DDs and so on. Imagine it as Rock, Paper, Scissors. It is not World of Battleships nor is it intetended to be World of Destroyers or whatever. The Overlords are looking for a balance so you can have fun in every shipclass. Thats why we are here, too. Your feedback is welcome, but you have to understand that if you dont have experience in one shipclass (e.g. DD) it will look like your opinion is biased. Demanding more range and control over secondaries would just make BBs even more powerful as they already are. If you do that, you have to buff all the other classes equally to maintain balance.

Wieso Avatar? Das bin ich...

Well, its the boring old "make BBs stronger so the can wreck everything without getting a scratch" thread. There are so many of them out there. No need for a new one.

You, Sir, did a good deed. People like that need to go to the bottom of the (virtual) sea.

Nun, mit nicht aushalten meinte ich durchaus, dass DDs schnell kritische Treffer bekommen.

Ahoi und willkommen im Forum. Ja, die DDs sind recht anfällig dafür. Es gefällt mir auch nicht sonderlich und ich würde mir ebenfalls wünschen, dass das nicht so einfach passiert. Aber mit steigendem Level des Käpt`ns hast du die Möglichkeit seinen Repairskill zu leveln. Und dadurch kann man es relativ schnell wieder einsetzen. Schneller jedenfalls als es bei BBs oder CAs möglich wäre. Ich versuche daher immer unsichtbar zu bleiben. 6th Sense kann dir dabei helfen. Aber manchmal hat man einfach Pech.

I killed a lot of Capital Ships with my US DDs. No problem whatsoever. Ofc you have to go pretty close with them, but only up to tier 7. You just have to find another play style than with the IJN DDs. The tier 8 US DD can fire her Torps outside of the detection range. And I loved it.

If you take away the spotting ability from planes then you also have to take away spotting planes. As I love to play DDs I would love this, but I think both would be very bad for the game. This looks like another post from an BB player how wants to take out a threat for his beloved BB because someone rekt him.

Gut das wir dich haben, OP. Schön, dass wir jetzt alle sehen, warum Leute glauben mit ihrem BB am Kartenrand rumgammeln zu müssen. Gerade mit den Schiffen, welche den größten Hitpoint Pool, Repair Fähigkeiten und die stärkste Panzerung haben. Leider sieht es nach deinem Schema F so aus, als würden alle anderen Schiffe nur dazu da sein, die BBs zu unterstützen bzw. deren zusätzlicher Trefferpunkte Pool zu sein. Ich glaube eher, dass das Spiel dynamischere Aufstellungen bevorzugt. Wenn man das immer so machen würde wie du es vorschlägst, dann wirft man die DDs und die CAs quasi weg. Ich will damit nicht sagen, dass das was du da vorschlägst grundsätzlich falsch ist. Aber es ist mMn eben auch nicht grundsätzlich richtig.

I guess its usually those BB players that dont do a regular 80-100k damage and need those computer guided secondaries to do the necessary damage and therefore demand a buff. Next stop will be that the main battery needs to aim and fire alone.

I doubt that they do a "reference test" now. I guess they still have the data from before 3.1. As I dont play BBs anymore, are the turn rates now worse then before 3.1? Do you guys have numbers?

Ich bin ja kein CV Spieler, knalle aber sehr gerne Flugzeuge ab und denke ebenfalls, dass es hier mehr XP geben sollte. Könnte man sich als CV Spieler eigentlich vorstellen, dass man die Bomben/Torps im Falle eines Jägerangriffs manuell abzuwerfen damit man sich schneller zurückziehen kann? Oder dass dadurch die Survivability der Bomber gegen Jäger erhöht wird?

Since I saw the patch notes I knew this topic would come up. No one was upset anymore about these insane turn rates, no one was mad before the 3.1 patch either. But take something away again (to turn rates that make way more sense) and the uproar will start.

I guess thats the reason win8 is considered more important than WR.

If you want a quick solution, getting an SSD is the right one. Obviously it is not a RAM problem. Otherwise you (and unfortunately me, too) have to wait.

Dude, there are no ivites. If you want to play it, you have to go the the shop https://eu.wargaming.net/shop/wows/ and buy a ship. With it you will get access to the CBT. But that you can read right there.

Oh yeah? No Happy Meal so far

Is this a troll topic? I mean, you are not new to the forum and you should know by now, that there are like 1000 similar if no the same topics already.