MudMonkey

Dude, you are new to the game. And I am sorry to tell you that you are not an average player by now. Which is normal with just a couple of games under your belt. There is still hope, as you are supposed to learn how this game works. It is not the ship that is not performing. Unfortunately it is you. But as I said, you are new. And it is not something bad. That you have bad experience with this ship doesn't mean that it is a bad ship. It is a good one. But you have to know how to play it. Just see my first post where I have outlined some points of the Königsberg. If you are not satisfied with the Newscomers' Section, then you should have a look at other guides. There are more than enough. And there are also some reviews about the Königsberg as she is in the game for quite some time now. You can look up what others wrote about her. Or start looking up Youtube about actual gameplay. Then you would realise that you are playing her wrongly.

But you can't. This is an exclusive club. Please see yourself out!

Wat habt ihr alle? Wenigstens freut er sich!

You can leave your puny KV-2 guns where they belong to. In WoT. And if you have connection problems, you should sort out your end of the line before claiming that it is WGs fault. Oh, and why don't you tell us all what "bad coding" is? I would love to see your powerpoint presentation of what the devs all did wrong creating this game. Thank you.

Of course it can't be, that you are doing something wrong in playing this wonderful little cruiser. Let me tell you something about speed. It doesn't necessarily mean that you have to be everywhere first with this ship but that you have enough reserves to run away from unfavorable situations. Those torps are also less for means of attack than for defense. Its main weapon are its guns with its awsome AP, not the torps. It is not a destroyer. And here comes in your good range on your guns. You are supposed to stay away and snipe with your good range and shell trajectory. 66% of you guns are on your stern. This makes this ship even better for turning and running away while still be able to fire with most of your guns at the enemy. You call yourself "not some "Pro" gamer". I don't know what that is suppost to mean. But perhaps you shouldn't call yourself what you are NOT, but what you are. You are an inexperienced and new player (You guys see how friendly I am here? I want some praise for holding myself back!).Thats ok. Unfortunately you also think that you know it all after just a couple of games. And that is bad. (#Kruger-Dunning) If you have problems with something we are all happy to help you. But to just vent your frustration is not really something we like to see here. So to bring this to an end, let me show you something beautiful you might find interesting for the time being: The newcomers' section

Yeah exactly. We want a power point presentation.

Real men are hairy

Here, OP. Look at this. Now do your homework.

"a shame to WWII"...wow. You actually make it sound as if WWII was something to be proud of. Anyway, I can't see how this is somehow connectet to P2W. All you get if you have a premium account is more credits and xp. Why don't you get a day of prem yourself to see if it will give you a winning streak like the world has never seen before. But what am I talking. He won't come back here anyway.

Naja, wenn man wenigstens die Möglichkeit hätte wählen zu können. Wie halt auch bei WoT. Kannste ja auch sagen, dass du bestimmte Modi nicht spielen möchtest.

Ich sehe das Problem meistens eher da, dass viele nicht verstehen, was "Domination" bedeutet. So sehe ich immer wieder, dass viele lieber am Spielfeldrand längsschleichen, sonstwo einem CV hinterher jagen oder sich anders von den Caps weglocken lassen.

I don't know what you are talking about. I think I will just ignore what you've said.

Tja, in bisher fast jedem Gefecht in dem ich eine Bismarck gesehen habe, performt diese ziemlich gut. Und zwar so gut, dass ich vermute, dass da bald nerf ansteht. Insbesondere Stürme sind wohl für sie gemacht worden. Man kommt schön nahe an den Gegner ran, ohne dass dieser einen bemerkt. Sollte es nicht so mit den Zitas klappen, hat man ja immer noch die MA die den Gegner garantiert in Brand setzt oder zumidest ordentlich zusetzt. Hoffentlich bleibt sie noch solange so wie sie jetzt ist, bis ich sie ausprobiert habe.

I guess they call it perspective

I say to counter BBs we need to buff HE!11!

Who is hot and why? Details pls.

Please do if you want to. But what do you want to show us with that table?

How I did the calculation? It is called stochastic or calculus of probability. You can google it if you want to. And I didn't say RU DDs are not ok. Just that WG thought they were underperforming in the HE department. I love my Khaba. I just took them as an example because there are a lot who are not playing them but are whining that they are too OP.

The RU DDs underperformed. Thats why they got a 1% buff some patches ago. Remember? I would love to see recent numbers of this kind. Just to shut everbody up already about this topic. Many even don't understand that a 12% fire possibility of one round is not a 108% fire possibility for 9 rounds but a 68% chance. But I digress. Fire is not OP. Players who don't know how to cope with it are UP

I agree. They are. And I think I saw that WG wanted to provide a chart with more recent numbers. But I am pretty sure, that WG also wants to keep it at certain level like in this one. If fire damage would be off the charts WG would adjust it. Like they did before.

That is not correct. The chart just shows where the damage comes from concerning the ammo type. Not the ship type. If you would use google you would find stats that show, that BBs receive most of their damage from other BBs in form of AP shells. I can promise you, that if CAs get buffed and start bouncing BB shells, we would have the next topic here from BB players: "CAs are OP11!!!one" And they would be right. Who would play BBs anymore if you have CAs like that? All this whining about "fires are OP" only is from a subjective point of view. And most just don't know (or don't want to know) that they can heal 100% of their fire damage in a BB as well. I have never seen a topic from CA players stating "AP shells are OP!!1!". Perhaps there should be.

God, this boring topic again. I am sure someone said it before, but here we go again. Most damage caused to BBs is not from fires but from AP rounds fired from other BBs. Of course facts are inconvenient. Therefore those stats will be ignored.

So lets get this straight. No one complains about the fact that the credits (ingame currency) and free xp will not be unified. And it also makes sense as you earn more credits within WoWS. But not gold? Why? If you buy premium time it is shared within your account. If you buy it for WoWS you will also get it for WoT. Therefore gold price for premium time is for both games the same. Which makes 1 Gold/WoWS = 1 Gold/Wot. We don't have a different value. So why is it not possible to unify this as well? Technical issues? BS.. Why is it working with WoWP? I guess we all already know the answer. Because many of us have quite some gold in WoT. But WG doesn't want us to use it. The reason is simple. That gold on our WoT account is already spent real money. WG won't get anything out of it. They want us to spend more money and not use that gold that we already have. I am not surprised but deeply disappointed. I still have a prem account until next year. But if this is true indeed, I won't spend money anymore on this game. They won't trick me twice.

The "Steven Seagal D*ck Punch" is legendary. And perhaps I also should dye my hair that way. He is soo cool.