_HomTanks_

So you want to continue discussing my question that was addressed to someone else, and why do you feel the need to answer on behalf of others? 1) That's right and not only report but blacklist/block. End of discussion. 2) People don't have a right to be offensive, i already stated this in my first post, which makes your sentence redundant and blacklisting them is an enough and effective punishment for them. What do you mean by getting away with it? So, because someone was offensive in the chat he/she should be crucified? A revenge on that player should be taken? "An eye for eye only ends up making the whole world blind" Gandhi. "Hey, you have been offensive in the chat, and although you were reported, lost -1 karma, and blacklisted, we decided to track you down as we know who you are, we found you and we banned you!..." L.Neeson Or "You called someone potato ten times and got an automatic chat ban but we think it is not enough. See, you can run but you can't hide. Take this revenge!" ? Second time, i encourage you to stop discussing my question that i specifically asked to someone else. Thanks.

Yep, i was asking MrConway. And to answer your comments, Didn't understand anything from this sentence, sorry. Yes, it is. If you wanna scold at another person for whatever reason and you can't because you are blocked, it means you are punished by being ignored and by being an action taken. Or, if i want to come to your personal chat and tell you stuff you don't want to hear, what do you do? Either write back to me stuff i don't wanna hear too, or blacklist me? Both roads yiled to same place, punishing back the person verbally or by action. But anyway, don't worry about my question i asked to someone else

I want to ask a question and not defending misbehavior in chat but, there are options for chat in game and at port. One can choose to block, mute, blacklist a person or even report the chat from the chat tab. When a person is muted or blacklisted, it doesn't matter what he/she writes as it won't be seen anymore. So, whatever he/she writes basically being ignored and have no bearing. But that person later gets additional chat 1-3-7-30-45 days chat ban because apparently being blacklisted or blocked or muted was not enough. My question is, isn't this double punishment? The person is already punished by being muted/blacklisted. Why punish him more? If there were no block, blacklist, mute, etc. options in the chat and punishment/penalty was applied later, it would make sense. But right now, anyone who uses f word, tato or any word that is not liked by the screening person gets punished in the game and later. Don't you think this is overkill? Thanks, 66

Well regardless, nice work you put out there. Just out of curiosity, can't you pull required data from wowsnumbers (or similar) ? All non-private account data could be pulled i think Cheers, 66

Right, but this won’t keep record of what you received from the containers. It will only sort out the available ships for the event.

They should have whispered KHABA’s ears “10km torps”, “15km firing range”, “faster rudder shift” and he would be alive now. Poor old fella

It asks for user password, i think in order to reach ships information in port. Can't it pull the player's ship info from wowstats or wownumbers sort of sites? It should be able to. You have done a nice work there but i as a player don't feel comfortable sharing my password with any site other than WG. For everyone else, a simple excel spread sheet like in link below takes only ten minutes to prepare (or you can use this excel, and add other tiers in separate tabs as well, another 15 min max.) and you don't have to share your WG login password with any site; https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ian3FFvYQMFIJG91zLiXbdAIE3L6uNP0trcfpYhxoKw/edit#gid=0 Cheers, 66

I am sorry for you mate....NOT! Joke aside, i have been playing it since the beginning, normal.

Since this is aimed specifically to include CVs in ranked, it will be another "not fun" ranked season for most of the players but fun for the minority CV players.

But that's not for the ships. It is for everyone who ranked out. Later, when Black and Flint were available for steel, many people spent their steel on these ships and have not been compensated with anything so far.

Did we get steel credit back for Black and Flint? I don't recall that. When? How much steel?

Well you are talking about one camo. There are many of us who paid real money on ships that are available to everyone for coal in the armory, meaning they are free, now. Again many of us spent hard earned steel on Black&Flint and they will be available for coal, too, meaning free. When you add these up, one camo looks so insignificant. On the other hand, i am saying what WG has done in the case of camo is right but when you look at other examples mentioned above, you will see that such a move by WG is not surprising and there are worse moves.

37 at the moment. I think i will get two more coal/steel ships until September.

@Leo_Apollo11 has a nice analysis for previous containers and SCs in below link; Cheers, 66

I recall September from previous years.

Yes and, "in my last game, the new CV of mighty Germany attacked me as the first ship, he did a 26k rocketstrike on me, after that 25k.. could not heal it back because the rockets citadelled me, 1 shell hit from thunderer was enough to finish me, game ended for me right there after 4 minutes and zero dmg, cv? 22 citadells on me..."

Except that he was not in the heat of a battle. It was 4 min into the game and he died without firing a single shell.

They would lose to our top clans.

If one can't handle dodging AP planes in order not to get citadeled by them 22 times and risk of potential BB shells, they can use smoke. In this case, OP obviously didn't know what KM CV was capable of, so ignored the planes. A replay provided by the OP could solve all the mystery...

Not everything in the game is real Yea, he was in the Navy once like tons of other players were (and some still are) in the Navy. Army, AF

Well, if the light cruiser goes to sink a BB knowing planes are around, he is taking risk. The risk includes getting blapped in smoke, too, which is very easy for us vet players to do so. Another risk is dd or CV forcing you out of your smoke and getting blapped again. But in this case, if a Mino player loses 22 citadels to AP rockets, it is because he didn't angle to them, and when planes were thru with him, he had less than 1K HP left? One DD shell could have sunk him at that point, let alone BB. Also, why didn't he smoke when he saw the planes coming at him?

He is not ancient enough and not a real commander

If you are close enough to be blapped by a BB while CV is attacking you in a light cruiser, you are obviously playing it wrong in the first place.

Same here, i have 5 out of 8 and did not spend any coal on them. I like Cunningham and also use it in Daring&Cossack but some CV mains prefer Cunningham in their CVs. Jerzy Swirski is doing good in my Halland. I wonder how Philippe Auboyneau preforms in French DDs.

So you have spent 1,050,000 coals on these commanders already. It is a lot of coal Which one did you like playing most?