_HomTanks_

Just posted a short clip that shows how to cita GK with 34K+. This was a close distance cita but also dealt the same damage and cita from long distance as well. The ones who have hard time citadeling GK could watch. https://youtu.be/MxjjgmIH_tI

Yep. Also, researchers: "A nuclear explosion would be a disaster"...

As if, all skills are as useless as last stand on a BB...

I never spent any dub for any commander nor will I spend. Don’t need to, have many top level captains. I feel sad for the ones who don’t have many 19pointers. It will be harder for them to train their captains without cash or spending more time in the game.

And now removed it completely.

Have more captains than ships which means way too many to count including the 19 pointers. Not gonna spend 1 hour for it, sorry

You read it right. Some of us already made the comments here in previous threads when this captain skill rework was first announced a month or two ago. Half trained captains could utilize 50% of their skills in game before the rework. After the rework, half trained captains will not be able to utilize any skill. In other words, new system is pushing players to spend more CXP/ECXP or doubloons=real money in order to make a captain work while retraining them. Overall, us veteran players will not be affected by these changes as much as newer players because they are the target of this new rework. Making the game more difficult for newer player base is quite questionable though.

Hi Again YabbaCoe, The way it works now is neglecting everyone who has reset 1 line or 100 lines until emblems were introduced. I think they can check any player's progress of how many lines were reset. For instance, I have gotten all RB ships plus reset 10 lines afterwards. I am sure this is logged within WG servers and it could be checked how many lines i have reset and the emblems can be credited accordingly. Having reset all ships plus additional lines and then getting no emblem in return is not only unfair but also system-wise is incorrect. The system has to include previous resets. The system won't register the correct number of players and how many times they reset lines with its current state. For example, this is not something like introducing a new emblem now for how many times you citadeled enemy ships and I'm asking to count my old citadels in 5 years. These RB emblems are introduced now, and we are talking about 5 ships. Can you please help? Thanks.

Except that it is not because I and We change the implication of the meaning in that sentence. There is a big difference between I need and We need.

Right, I had this experience in almost every other game yesterday and today.

Of course but if you say “we” you are implying to more than you and not only yourself unless there is another you in “you” like Gollum...Say “what I need” (or what I think is needed), not “what we need” as you don’t know what others think and want...

They are two ships that have nothing in common. Incomparable, hence, one doesn't set an .example for another.

1. It is 9 days not 7. 2. You could complete all tasks of the first mission of Ships and Fate Campaign except the final one which requires Strasbourg to complete and when you get Strasbourg, it takes a game to finish the first mission of the campaign considering you have already completed other tasks previously. 3. There is no such rule that everyone has to compete in all the modes and complete all the campaigns. They can tailor what suits them according to their convenience. 4. We are talking about T5 ships and other negligible stuff that come along. 5. Ships and Fates missions are quite easy. A very casual player can easily finish 1 mission per day and a regular player can finish a couple of missions per day. 6. Comparing this event to PR event from the grinding point of view, doesn't make any sense since they are incomparable. PR was a ultra-hard grindy dockyard event whereas Ships and Fates is the exact opposite, super easy. 7. This was discussed in other threads when the campaign was introduced, a couple of weeks ago? There are also some campaign guidance threads open at the moment. So, you seeing that Strasbourg is required to complete the first mission of Ships and Fates, now, is on you.

Yea, there was no chat, no marking on map, nothing exchanged between him and me but I guess he was just frustrated on himself and sunk me in the end. There are lots of players like this.

Yea, he is extremely noob. He expected me to go chase enemy dd so he could get a kill but that would be a very risky move for me with no hp against an ostergotland and more noticeably it would be a highly unnecessary adventure since we barely fixed the point and it was almost end game. Did t expect him to think all these ofc

Imo, below video is a good example of how to utilize a T8 Siliwangi in a Tier 10, and CV game. This game Siliwangi had 5343 XP, which is the Highest Max. Experience in all servers and a World Record. But more than that, what's important is patience and adjusting the limit of greediness and i think i could have taken less damage from enemy if I could adjust a bit better.

Today, it was introducing a Stalingrad to the world of Citadels with a stock Baltimore. Anchorage came as a bonus.

I know what you did there!

I ranked out the first day, too and we played a couple of games together and against. I remember you abusing FDR and Marceau

Randoms is an indicator of how good of a player you are. Coop is not. Period.

But this account I posted is not alt account. People usually don’t play coop in their alt account.

I’m not talking about service record. This player has 2k plus coop games vs 30 random games and able to play ranked.

Thanks for the info. Coop is not a skill determining factor for a player. How can WG count coop games is another numb question with i'm sure pretty dumb answers.

Then, bot is really the correct term we use here quite often.

I remember seeing some posts that one needs to have certain amount of battles to participate in ranked mode. Here, posting this to disprove those thoughts that if you have only 30 battles or perhaps even less, you can enjoy the new ranked mode. This player has played 30 games (yes, total) in random and has 58 battles in ranked. Welcome to new Ranked Ladies & Gentlemen! (No, it's not naming and shaming, i am only displaying and mentioning about the amount of games the player has in random and ranked. Also posting an in-game screen shot, in case there will be doubts that he was really in the game or it was bug. He was in the game and this new mode just can put a fresh beginner next to the player with highest amount of battles. You be the judge!).