_HomTanks_

Canon Character, Comfort Coupe, Copa Cabana, Carbon Copy, Closed Captioning, Courtesy Copy, Cubic Centimeter, Cross Country, Carpet Cleaning... For Flamu Clinical Center, Common Cause, Critical Care, Call Center, Cotton Candy, Cyber Cafe, Cyber Crime, Common Cold, Coco Chanel, Chief Complaint...?

Ryujo.

- You played 47% of your total battles in BBs. - It seems like you are doing better in T10 BBs compared to Cruisers. - Stalingrad has never been a pleasant ship to play in Random games. After the commander skill rework, it is even less fun to play it. It was popular in CBs when it came out. That popularity soared quick after the introduction of CVs into CBs and Venezias. I'd suggest you to go after a T10 BB (Bourgogne or Shikishima) with your steel if it is itching.

The whole reason of buffing Atlanta's range and showing middle finger to Flint lies in the way they are obtained. Flint is a coal ship, meaning it is free to get. Atlanta is a cash paid premium ship. If you want to sell more Atlantas, simply buff her while leaving her fraternal twin crippled. Tl;Dr Money talks, BS walks.

I really don’t know her case. Maybe she also works for WG other than her CC role.

Sure. I don't agree with "to discuss" part. What can be a concern of Flamu fans is whether he quits streaming or not and Flamu did not quit streaming. Rest of the formality of being CC or not (like who cares and why, i don't understand) is their business. Hence, discussing the terms of him being CC or ex-CC is just waste of time and a meaningless discussion at best.

I understand but i look at it as, this issue is between two parties which means it is none of our business. He already said he doesn't need the extra dubloons and codes for boxes on his cc account. I don't know for sure if they get paid but as far as i know, they don't.

Two parties, WG and Flamu couldn't get along and went separate ways. WG happy, Flamu happy as nothing really changed for him. He said he was thinking about quitting CC program anyway and will also continue streaming. So, why is there so much drama here on the forum?

Where is it? Can you share it? I must have missed it. But, I do as a player. I am waiting for you to back your claim that a WG spreadsheet which shows majority of players want tone and ise in the game. If you can't share it, you are nothing but a drooling tool who just likes getting into counter discussions with no real purpose or gain out of it. Sure, show me the surveys and their results held by WG. Until then, you can just give yourself a break from being ColonelPete v2.

You are confusing two spreadsheet definition here. One is the spreadsheet WG has and neither you nor I know anything about it. Second one is the mythical spreadsheet all community knows and which is more credible than what WG holds. So, you are basing your discussion on something you don't know. I base mine on self observation in forum. But if this is not the case, WG is welcome to share their spreadsheet.

No, it is not that easy to say people have been asking for these ships. There are more people that have been objecting to these ships with the same logic. If WG will listen to the community, they need to look at the majority. But they don't look and they won't listen. Taking into consideration of a request by minority over majority does not justify their unilateral actions. If no one asked for these ships WG would still introduce them into the game, just like they did with cv and commander reworks and will do with subs They keep trying to add things into the game regardless of the community opinion. Of course, they sort of (not really) do a brief introduction in devs blog about what is coming to hit us but it's already decided by WG. At no point they ask the player base, do you want this or not. So, for every change there will be some people saying 'yay' and many others 'nay'. The primary problem is WG forces people who really play the game with major changes they decide which should not be the case imo. The forum is full of player complaints about WG's one direction decisions.

But you have Georgia, and it does the job.

That's why i posted this;

I've seen way more players not asking for tone and ise and objecting to those than the ones asking for. Same for CV rework.

Players on forum: "Introducing surface ships with CV planes is not good for the game" WG:

If you have extra doubloons (and they are itching), and if you don't have Musashi, then, Hizen. If you don't have extra dubloons, then, get neither. If you have Musashi, then get neither because Amagi.

So, all in all the point of your whole OP is to brag about your CV skills. That's fine. It could have been shorter and simpler "Hi, i'm a good CV player, can sink most of you even without having Enty". I'd sell you my Enty if it was possible, but since it isn't, i think loot boxes are the only solution unless you get miraculously lucky to get it out of a SC.

You wrote and i didn't take it serious because it doesn't make any sense. Will you sink 1500 ships for every ship you don't own and never played (which is more than 300) ?

With your approach or logic i could say the same "you don't have to post such threads here about personal goals", but i'm not saying that. Out of curiosity I asked what was your motive by doing so and you avoided the Q.

Well, CVs can input better stats to one's overall stats if they get good in playing CVs. So, you care or don't , it will improve your overall stats eventually. Also, it's not about my feelings. You are the one who claims that will do such a thing, hence it's about your feelings. You will do what you feel like doing. That's about it. I'm just stating game related facts. But you can answer why we would need to know your commitment of how long it will take to grief and sink surface ships in CVs.

In real life, Scharny was faster by a slim margin on trials;

Except, i didn't try to stat shame you. I'll gain nothing by doing that and you are not a bad player. However, it is obvious your attempt of killing 1500 (number is really irrelevant) ships in CVs will only improve your overall stats. This is a fact. Not shaming. Doing so is also griefing which i mentioned both in my previous post. In addition, i'm not sure how you ended up thinking i'm angry. I guess, anyone who disagrees with your post seem angry to you. If you want to grief people, go ahead. You can do it without declaring in the forum. Lastly, your attempts of showing how carriers can output disproportionate dmg, frag, etc. on surface ships won't prove anything new because it's already been proven countless times until now and by many players and everyone in this game is aware of what's wrong with CVs. That's why we had and have another 100s of pages CV threads and not even mentioning the new daily CV complain threads that pop up.

Well, many streamers as well as testers are incompetent anyway. It’s always been like this.

True but it goes both ways. Also in order to get advantage of the croc camo, you need to have a very good game in Black. Otherwise, it's bonuses are far from satisfactory in regular or low influence games.