_HomTanks_

As i said, in my case, i have all the steel ships, rb ships, i have more than 300K coal for a couple of t9 coal ships (which i'm not interested in) in case i want to get one, have all fxp ships, etc. But even if i were missing steel or other resource ships, i still wouldn't buy the same thing twice with real money. It's illogical.

Many are missing the point and wasting their time and efforts by ranting here about subs, supershts, etc. This is what wegee wants you to do. To come here, use the forum for ranting and that's it. They don't give a crap about the forumites opinions (they rather take into consideration what their limited amount of discord friends say), they implement what they want to implement, regardless how much you rant, later (will) introduce premiums for subs and s.shts, expect to milk general player-base who don't even come here or discord or who come occasionally but don't give a f. So, why wasting time and your energy to rant, give ideas about how to make the game better, etc.? Wegee will do what they will as they have done until now, and their shills (mostly the ones who can free test ships) keep cheering for or defend them. This is what's been going on for years and nothing will change further on. Tl;dr? Remember, no one, especially wegee doesn't care about your in-game experience. Period.

If animals could talk, which species would be the rudest of them all and why?

He thinks a ship’s opness is based on how well a 30%wr player would achieve in it.

Why is its popularity so low? Because most of us stopped bothering PTS after they removed many rewards. That’s because of wg being stingy af and hence, it is their fault if pts is unpopular which we’ve been writing it here for years. From another perspective, regardless of pts, they have their own closed test server. There is nothing that can justify wg using its players like lab rats. Is it the players’ fault if they can’t deliver a proper product, or is it their fault? You seem lack some common sense.

If this version of brawls was for teams, it should’ve been set for teams only. Why allow solo players in it? So only the teams can have fun? Not surprising to see another wg shill.

Frankly, it'd be really stupid of me to spend real money on the same ship second time just to obtain certain amount of in-game resources (and even if they give 100K steel back). That's simply unjustifiable. It's a pass from me.

Maybe but it doesn't make any difference because WG's sentence concerns the ships available at the moment. " The amount of whichever resource is in the bundle will be enough to obtain any Tier X ship currently available for purchase."

Again, it may be generous or not, this is a wishful thinking. I don't think WG has in mind to compensate whom they milked, including me, three years ago in the first place. Their aim is to sell PR for the second time, to newer players. According to the above sentence what i understand is, they will give enough type of resource to obtain any T10 ship available at the moment. Below are the most expensive available ships atm; - Steel: FDR 33K Steel - Neustrashimy 296K Coal - Any T9 ship in the armory under Doubloons tab, 19.300dubs - Resource ships, can't see them right now, but i remember they were 50-60ish K research points.

Okay, so 33K is a wishful thinking especially when it comes to dubs. It could be very well 22-25K dubs instead and that is if WG decides to give out that much dubs to all previous PR owners that complete the dockyard. Or they could compensate 250K coal or 27-28K steel, or 50-60K RB points as a resource. Why 33K anyway?.... Edit: okay, checked the armory now. The most expensive steel ship FDR is 33K. Still i doubt they would give out 33K dubs since the most expensive doubloon ship is 19.300. I wish they would...

Does it mention the number 33,000 anywhere in the article related to PR?

Reroll to troll

My Q is, why would one play the sprint ranked mode for win rate ratio in the first place? I don’t think Wr means anything in this mode.

My post was about subs. You brought up CVs. My answer to that was they are not comparable. IMO, Cv rework is not comparable to adding a whole new class into the game. But, if you think the opposite it’s fine. That wouldn’t make any difference. As a matter fact, nothing anyone writes here on this forum makes any difference. The forum has become more like a chat room for many people already. Edit: not sure if the fonts are ok, writing from phone and they seem a bit weird, some big some small.

How does it feel to get confused at your own assumptions? Must be amazing.

I’m really not familiar with most of the games out there because I don’t have much time but I keep seeing ads of different naval games. Don’t know how they are, good-bad, realistic, historic or not, but one of them may be good. Or maybe they are working on a good one somewhere who knows…

Because CVs have been in the game since the beginning. Yet, the rework still caused many high skilled players and clans to quit the game.

We’ll quit it at one point, eventually. And I remember those playing in commodore days 🤗

They will outlast you, don't worry.

There is that person who likes playing subs. There are those 5, 10, 15 people...some people. Yet, , from the forum polls and social media comments it could be said the amount of such people that like playing subs are incomparably low to some others who don't like playing in or against subs. WG wants to (if they didn't already) embed subs forever in the game just like another class despite to all faulty class counter-interactions (which have been explained to wg staff in hundreds of comments and forum pages) because of their monetization politics or strats. It's their game hence they can do whatever they want to do. The options are clear, straight-forward and noted by others; And correct, subs are just buffed again; On the other hand, it doesn't mean you can't have successful games when subs are in-game. You can, because there are many other factors that would/could change the outcome of the match, BUT, if we're talking about the fun factor then it's all subjective. As i've observed also during the games many random players writing on chat screen how subs ruin the game and similar, out of nowhere, it's just not surprising the addition of subs to the game is against the game's own interest in the long run. The buffs that have been made or the necessary nerfs that have not been made to subs (let alone removing them to another game mode) are just indications of wg wanting to strongly embed them into the game with the plans of releasing new lines and their premiums in the future. So it's a long term plan but will only satisfy their short-term goals thanks to churn rate. The reality is, almost every customer (player) plays a video game (free or not) to have fun. If there is no more fun to it, they will stop playing it. WoWs is far from being a great game, let alone being one of the best. It's not historical, not realistic. not rewarding, just an arcade game, etc. while being a f2p game helps to pull new players into the game to try and see. If you are up to the point of having enough of it, you can take a break or go for another game. Because subs will be more permanent than any of us here.

True but that would short live because, if you come out with a nice game and people like it the way it is balanced for years and if you suddenly introduce something absurdly breaking the game play enjoyment and hanging around being op, then, not only the first comers will leave the game but also the new comers won't stay long after they realize the status of the game. There are literally over 5 million other games out there.

Gold ranked TRB Hayate gameplay. A CV game and enemy played very good.

Caught a murican streamer in EU server

I can continue discussing with every sentence and table you post here and find things to just prove otherwise. But i know better, wasting this much time is more than enough. You can't help yourself not prolonging the discussions or deciding when to stop, just like before. Look i stop now. You can write whatever you want from this point on. Bye. {Waving at you}

Opportunity? Now you are going semantic. I stand by what i said before because math is universal. In opposite, which is most common. What's rare is the time you agree on something. Again, we can agree to disagree as we have been doing since 2015-16.