_HomTanks_

Keep in mind that everyone here tells you what playstyle suits them best. So You need think twice before you decide, others' taste may not entertain you. I have those three DDs for a very long time and played them, too. Black an Neustra are unique DDs because one has radar-smoke combo and the other one has zombie heal. Z-44 is a wannabe Benham, or poor man's Benham.But it has very fast torp (12km) reload that can outrun enemy hydro and has better guns than Neustra and can gunfight with Black easy. If you are spotted in Neustra your zombieheal may save you once but not twice depending o nthe enemy skill ofc. You can bait Black radar and even if you don't, it's very short duration. It's torps are near useless and guns are weaker than Fletcher. I'd prefer in the enemy team a good dd player in Black or Neustra rather than a Z-44. It's a big headache especially if it is not spotted.

Except, this boat can't hit or when it hits, it doesn't hit hard. So it only runs.

I have almost all ships. Not the newest premiums but most. Also have Canarias, unfortunately. It's the worst prem i have. Friendly advise, don't get it even for an in-game resource (let alone by dubs or cash).

Bronze and silver are very good format wise as they are now. People including me having difficulties on moving forward consistently in Gold league (I went up to 5) is not due to the format only. The pain in the gold league is caused from the noob player base, who don’t have the understanding of ships, mechanics, tactics or maps, but wanting to rank out in gold league. Player base is the problem. The qualification between silver and gold should be even further enhanced in a way to prevent all these unskilled players advancing to gold league IF we are talking about a really skill based gold league. The current format of gold league otherwise is good. But only who really deserve should be able to reach this league, not the spammers. Of course sometimes you get a landslide victory or defeat but it has always been there in randoms and ranked. And saving a star never guaranteed your star actually. You could be a sunicum with a very unskilled suicidal teammates and think to play your best so you can save your star while another teammate with 46% wr could just keep spamming he from the borderline with his Smolensk or thunderer and take that star from you. Closest interpretation to a skill based league is how current Gold league is set but if everyone is welcomed to this league, then we can’t talk about skill here either. tl;dr Current sprint ranked format is much better than the previous one with all the leagues but the qualification phase to gold league should be much more difficult to eliminate low skill game spammers jump there.

Look at the top 5 in each team. You killed the game play with all these super shts and subs. GJ WG....That enemy sub has 46% wr, but it doesn't matter because WG managed to make the game stupid-proof.

"Tato is a tato and they are everywhere" is a different discussion than, "one server having lower quality game play than one another due to higher number of tatos".

And I heard SEA is the worst.

Qualification rules from bronze to silver is arranged according to silver league since teams do not only consist of bronze qualifying candidates but also players from the upper silver league and since you can’t impose bronze league rules to silver league players, bronze league qualifying candidate players have to play as per the silver league rules.

I think it doesn’t matter really. I sunk an Alaska and a Kron with a full stock Seattle while open watering, yesterday on my alt account in separate games. Like Garrus said, it depends on the captains more than the ships. Tato is a tato, hence, it doesn’t matter.

this.

We need more gems like you here, where u goin'?

Okay but It's about -40 pr points. Last time it happened it was around the same amount. Why does he even remove non-players data? It's not like those games weren't played. So, if we take an extreme assumption and think 3 years later only 2 players left in EU server. Does that mean he will remove all non-playing users again, and all it will be on his stats side is the only games that these two players had against each other? That's stupid. This one seems more trustworthy; https://wowstats.org/

Players with 500-1000 games with 45%-50% wr trolling you, saying this needs buff, that needs nerf although they are ignorant of this game. I don't understand why you keep feeding them or why even respond. Just ignore them.

People gave you their opinions...is totally different than bashing you as if you are not welcome. Don't be over-dramatic. You just started playing the game and already sound like a snowflake...These people here telling you stuff have thousands of wows game experience. WoT has nothing to do with WoWs. I played WoT in 2013 and didn't like it, hence started WoWs. They are different games. Of course you will eventually learn how to play this game, too, but in a nutshell, what people told you is, you shouldn't have spent any money before you play this game for some time and see if you'll like it enough to invest in it. Which is a very logical advice and valid for any game. You have bought the ships anyway, so now you will invest time on learning how to play those ships correctly. For this, first i'd suggest you to check the ship characteristics from here; https://wiki.wargaming.net/en/World_of_Warships And then to watch YT videos regarding the ships you bought. Play lower tiers to learn the game and work your way on to upper tiers before jumping on the high tier ships. Btw, you joined the game probably in its worst state. The first 3-4 years were the best. Since then the game is absolutely unbalanced. But hey, welcome to the club.

I played some random games this weekend. It was simply horrible. The game never had this many low skilled players in a such a so populated, so dense, so many state. Just like what we were writing here years ago that the player base quality had been at a decline and coming events casted their shadows before…Now it is at a point that i hardly see unicums in the games. Maybe once or twice a week. A sunicum and purple divs in randoms are even more seldom. Back in the day, every a couple of games, there would be at least single or double sunicum divisions on both sides and we’d play so focused, game would see minute 20 mark most of the time. And even if the game was lost, it was still fun. Now, game starts, it shows minute 15 something and at the top right corner of the screen appears three red ships destroyed three green ships. Until minute 10, 2 ally ships remain. Or somehow if the game reaches to minute 05 mark, an allied ship shows full broadside and gets dev struck or ally dd tries yoloing and game is lost. Current iteration of the game along with the general player base is bad, laughable. Unfortunately. Yet, these days were so obvious to come.

why bother buying all? I have almost all the ships which you can’t even buy with money anymore. I’ll sell you my account and voila! You have everything you need in this game 😁

Forget wiki, it's not reliable at times. Go to the training room and try first hand. We have not seen El2aZer bs'ing here once. You can trust what he says as he is one of the best cv players in the EU server for years.

Ofc not. If you run into a better enemy player, regardless of the class they are or you're playing chances of getting killed is high anyway. A cruiser can kill you from smoke or behind a cover as well or by one shot an enemy BB can double cita you, too. The point is you can improve your game play to a point to predict enemy dd's and torps direction and you can evade (or you'd get one torp instead of 5 torps and being dev struck). On the other hand, it doesn't matter how much you improve your game play against CVs. WG had nerfed the AA of surface ships to the ground after rework. Even when you think sometimes AA works against lower tier CVs, yay, I shot down 38 planes with an Iowa, the planes keep coming, as if they come out of a non-stop working factory. There is nothing against a CV you can do. Comparing dds with cvs is wrong. CVs are/have been by far the most unbalanced class in the game. RTS time was much better. At least, some surface ships had means of protecting themselves up to a degree. But money and the greed beats the game play fun. Idk about that. I didn't see any good dd player complaining about radar or hydro. If you are talking about brawls, no i can't suggest. As i wrote you in my first post, that mode is trash. In random, MM mirrors classes anyway.

There is no such thing as cv hate. Best cv players articulate the reasons why cvs don't fit the game in their current state with proofs and examples while average or bad cv players praise cvs most of the time. In many cases it is just not a coincidence the same people who praise cvs or want more buff for cvs also suck at other classes while the reverse is not true for those very good cv players as they also excel in other classes. Also stating dds are overly strong or strong in regular games where a cv is not present, just shows the lack of game play ability. Every ship class has its ups and downs. You can take a match-up in your BB against a CV instead of a dd and every single time you will go deep in the ocean whereas you have more chances against a dd but of course if you have any clue about how to play against classes.

His title is misleading and hence you probably didn't read his all post. What he's saying is (as i understand) in that specific game, there were no cvs, his team had 1 dd and enemy had 3 dds and he's complaining about how it could be a fair game 1 dd vs 3 dds. He thinks at least if there was a cv, it could have countered enemy dds.

They made it an asymmetric MM mode including the possibility of one side having full divisions while the other side having none, one side having dds while the other side having none, one side having a CV while the other side having none, or the example you gave. Don't waste your time on this mod. It's trash.

You are toxic. She won't respond to you...

New format seems better than the previous sprint ranked formats. Tiers are good, losing star format is an improvement. Rewards could be a bit better. Especially the rank 1 boxes didn't give out anything nice before. I'm not sure if they have been improved for the following season.

“Until morale improves” = until we forcefully make you get used to the subs…