_HomTanks_

This is what I was going to write. What is logic behind it I wonder. If edin and mini can stealth radar and have lower firing penalties why did they leave Neptune out? One thing comes to mind is perhaps that’s how they balanced it when it was introduced comparatively to other t9s back then. But if this was their logic, it’s been a long time and meta changed. I think they need to bring it to same level with other uk cls.

hahahaha!

I had a thread about this last month. You can see here what people think about the new emblems.

This one is even better

Hi, it is not a need issue :) Imagine i have an X brand car and for years i've been driving it. Then, give it to you for a day to tour around. Would you know the car as good as me in one day? Ofc, not. LMW is just checking the theoretical part of aa dps while we have cv experts here who know both theoretical and practical aspects.

They received their emblems in NA server. Probably need to wait some hours.

Here is an example of Kill Securing

It is called "Kill Securing"

Game quality is important for any game, i think you would agree on this. If a game has bad quality, it will not get many customers in the first place and lose current customers, too. Of course it is the development and design departments that produce a quality game or not but it is the players who show others whether the game has quality or not. If there are skilled, smart players that play that game good and up to its limit, the game quality will shine more and attract more others. If the players can't play good, the game won't seem at its best quality, due to lack of skilled players. I hope we agree until here. Regarding your post, minorities are never ignored in any civilized society and here in this game when you say very small minority, we are talking about some thousands of players who polish and shine the game quality to its upper limit. I agree that businesses have different view and impacts on any industry (i unfortunately have witnessed where quality is sacrificed to money many times as a professional) and this approach does not bring good results in the long run. Those players you call small minority are the quality of this game. Letting them go would a bad business decision. If, as a company, you don't want to make radical changes according to a "small minority" but also don't want to lose them either, then you better come up with another plan, like a middle way. These clans have been working on solutions as what they demand is not the removal of cv completely and probably even offered these solutions to WG. If WG thinks they will not reason with this player base and ignore all the work done, spent hours by them to find the solutions, then the blame is not on the minority but on WG. Just remember this, anywhere in the world and in any industry, sacrificing quality over money will only work in short terms. It will bring more harm to company's reputation in the long run.

understood and ty sir

Well, I obviously read it and hence asked you if you read it too. Apparently we have different interpreting of it. GL with your intent here, whatever it is.

Are you sure that you read the whole original post and understood what is written?

The only official update news about adding bots into randoms is explained in below picture (and they are being added today) which is addressed in forum's update section. I am not aware of any other official response or information released by WG regarding adding bots in to higher tier random games.

Same here.

Actually, there is "plays poorly" option similar to what you suggested and guess what sanction it proposes? Nothing, nill, zero sanction. How about unsportsmanlike report? Nothing again. You get reported for AFK? Just play two games and your color will change from pink to normal, omg what a sanction what a relief...WG staff stated themselves that the reports other than misbehavior in chat have no real function. Then why are they there WG? Why can't you make the reporting system useful WG? Why do you allow redundancy in the system?

Could you please post the link for the full page like in below example? Thanks. https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/general-news/ranked-16/

Does this mean there are less newcomers compared to previous years? Because it just sounds like it is an action taken due to low number of games in low tiers.

That is why many players think the chat sanctions and wg policies don't match but rather create a hypocritical system. In fair environment, if a person gets chat banned in an increasing duration (1-day, 3-days, 1 week, 2 weeks, a month...) because he writes potato in chat and some snowflake got his feelings hurt because he thought he is not a potato but a cowberry, then those who shoot, torp allied ships and/or stay at A-J-1-10 lines all game long should be banned from the game not from the chat.

Dropping this info here for time-tracking purposes; The super containers are updated in patch 0.9.6 with below ships added. Lucky ones can post it here if they get one of these updated ships

Actually, clans protesting clan battles does not mean they won't do randoms or other modes of the game. It will be enough for them to fulfill the purpose of their boycott if they only don't participate in clan battles. Hence, they don't have to live without WoWs. I agree with your first para.

It is literally one of the most useless features of the game. Basically it is good for nothing. Don't even worry about it, or forget it exists. I'm serious. :)

Thx bro, i'll try that later. Also thanks to _Warfarin_ and MacArthur92 for their input.

If you want information, go and get it. Don't wait for it to come to you.