Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

JohnMac79

Players
  • Content Сount

    1,872
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    18680
  • Clan

    [VICE]

Everything posted by JohnMac79

  1. JohnMac79

    Developer Bulletin for Update 0.11.3

    No, you haven't learned a thing. And they are still completely broken and a negative to the game. Just like CV. This is frankly insulting, because it is evidently untrue. Like who? I have not met one... Why on earth would you listen to people, and make 'balance' changes based on people who play 5 games per month? Eh? Are these the people WG balancing department take seriously? No wonder the game is a show. This is the dumbest thing i have ever heard, and i simply dont believe it. WHO are these people that love it? Griefers? People that play 1 game per month? What are the numbers of those who love it? Lets see some cold hard figures.
  2. JohnMac79

    Subs are making this game unpleasant

    Yet another game with double sub division. Spent most of the the game being zoned out and took 6.3k damage from ships, but 85k damage from subs and the rest from Nakhimov...
  3. JohnMac79

    Can we have a SUB Forum Ranked

    Ranked is basically randoms.
  4. JohnMac79

    Roadmap for 2022

    Roadmap for 2022: Make the game as trash tier as possible in the hope of making a few roubles. Reintroduce garbage subs back onto the live server for 'testing', because the test server is no longer really for testing, testing happens now in ranked and randoms. Introduce a line of HE spammers, because when we said we didnt like HE smoke spam meta, we didnt really mean it. Introduce tier XI, because tier X wasnt trash enough as it is these days. Continue to pretend we care about your feedback. When we ask you, we expect you to reinforce what we are doing and tell us we are amazing. We will improve visuals, putting even more strain on our antiquated steam driven game engine, so we can all experience more desync. P.S. Plz give more money...
  5. JohnMac79

    SUB POLL for the benefit of YABBACOE.

    Playing randoms just feels like a massive waste of time now, subs are just ruining any fun experience there ever was to have. I cant even be arsed grinding out the ships i was trying to unlock, cant get a single good game anymore, its just painful trying to grind through the Zieten and im currently sitting at 28% win rate on it. It will take me weeks of self harm at this rate to get to the next ship. Eendract is even worse sitting at just 11% win rate... Screw this crap. Edit: So just played Halland, 32 depth charges dropped, 10 depth charge hits on sub and a total of 6600 damage before he just vanished.... in the meantime i am spotted by him and get obliterated. This is straight up the most retarded game design i have ever seen.
  6. JohnMac79

    i dont like subs...

    Just waiting for all these threads to be dumped together so it looks like there is less complaining, just like they did with the 400+ page CV thread.
  7. JohnMac79

    RNG or some else ?

    You ask a question and when someone asks to see the replay in order to perhaps give you advice this is your response. Continue to fail then. If you have 10k battles and still dont know what you are doing then nobody here can help you.
  8. JohnMac79

    SUB POLL for the benefit of YABBACOE.

    So we keep being told, yet still no evidence. Its the equivalent of kids in the playground claiming their uncles are ninjas. Just white noise nobody has any reason to believe.
  9. JohnMac79

    SUB POLL for the benefit of YABBACOE.

    Do you have in game chat disabled? .... As far as minority of players on the forum, in my country a poll of 1-2k people out of 67-68 million is considered representative...
  10. Was just in a game with @Andrewbassg in his Nevsky and @El2aZeR in his <cough> sub...
  11. All of my ranked games have been enjoyable tonight (even, dare i say, the ones with a CV ). Tried a random game first, complete joke of a stomp with subs being a fun killing show, decided to go to ranked instead for a change and... Every single one of these 7v7 ranked battles also lasted longer than the majority of the games i had yesterday too, with them being around 10-14 minutes long, as opposed to the 7-10 minute games i had yesterday in 12v12... Overall just more entertaining. Now just waiting for WG to say they have gathered enough data to put them in ranked and see how they fare there... just to spoil the only game mode left thats remotely enjoyable.
  12. 90.6% are against subs in their current design according to this one poll. They say they like the 'idea' of subs. I like the 'idea' of many things... I like the 'idea' that WG actually listens to their playerbase and takes into account their concerns... I still think we should have access to these results, and the questions asked.
  13. I have been here since open beta, and so far i have stayed away from ranked in its new format as i found it unbearable. Strangely now i find myself playing ranked again because randoms is so utterly Games especially over last few days have been awful beyond words, losing streaks of 9+ games, games over in 7 mins or just ping ping and using DC only to get burned and flooded anyway. The 7-8 min stomps, and sleep inducing boredom of randoms is now too much to bear. Oh and the trend i have also seen is subs just charging off after enemy CV right from the start, and while i mostly welcome CV exploding, its not great losing one while enemy still have theirs...
  14. JohnMac79

    Introduction of Exocet Missles

    I'm afraid you underestimate Wargaming.... I dont recall CV's in real life printing new ships every few seconds either.
  15. JohnMac79

    GPU Temps in Port

    My GFX card temps are ~42°C on Fjords at 2560x1440.
  16. You are so up your own rectum that you are now arguing against scientists. GG.
  17. JohnMac79

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    I understood exactly what he meant, if you dont, thats a you problem.
  18. Instead of trying to be clever and argumentative as always, how about look up what nonsense you are talking about first hm? It can save embarrassment. This is shown in a study by scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Leipzig, in collaboration with the Charité University Hospital and the Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience in Berlin. The researchers from the group of Professor John-Dylan Haynes used a brain scanner to investigate what happens in the human brain just before a decision is made. "Many processes in the brain occur automatically and without involvement of our consciousness. This prevents our mind from being overloaded by simple routine tasks. But when it comes to decisions we tend to assume they are made by our conscious mind. This is questioned by our current findings."
  19. Actually most decisions are made unconsciously.
  20. But your restaurant would be offering an option... tasty food, or a pile of excrement.
  21. JohnMac79

    Support carriers closed conceptual test

    Indeed which is something people have been asking to be changed since forever. Of course WG doesnt listen, but now this idiotic mechanic has got into their heads they may change it... just for CV's. So yeah a big FY to DD that smoke up their team still, or stay out on the front lines spotting.
×