JohnMac79

Thank you for taking our survey. Your response is very important to us.

102 pages of sub dicsussions and several dozen other sub threads, yet we still get questions like this from WG:

The fact you appear to think this needs explaining after the sheer number of complaints is frankly embarrassing, and is absolute proof WG doesnt listen to feedback or care about the game.

Silent hunter 3 = Amazing game. Cold Waters = Great game Uboat = Good game. Subs in WOWS =

Governments claim 0.002% is representative when they do polls

This only makes sense to WG. The same WG that balance CV around 'popularity' to artificially inflate the number of people who play it, is now restricting the ship altogether because it is 'popular' instead of nerfing it.

Should be a mod to change CV and subs to this icon too:

So 3.9% of players want subs. Amazing. Considering how detached from reality WG are, i guess they see this as a majority.

Been playing Transport Fever 2 for the last few days and its doing wonders for my blood pressure. Got 1000 other games on steam so im not short of something to play, I just cant bring myself to put the time (or the large amounts of money) into WOWS anymore like i used to. The game is a shadow of its former self, they seem to have fallen into a similar trap that WOW did, and they have no idea how to get out of it. Look how that turned out for them...

I guess that all sounds nice in a spreadsheet. If only WG had devs that actually played the game.

Wargaming balancing department be like:

You seem to listen about as well as WG...

The fact only you seem to think this is true is proof enough. What you are saying, with all due respect, is complete nonsense.

My guess is that they already have several premiums ready or in development, and perhaps even some events planned, so i think they may make some *very* slight tweaks and push them to live depending on how many models they have ready.

I am saying MANY people including CV mains tried telling WG options as opposed to the whole fail rework and they didnt listen. Which is true.

Which is a completely fabricated claim.

Maps are literally the lowest priority for WG because there is no money to be made from them. I wouldnt expect to see a single one this year, and i would be surprised if we see one next year. They just announced they are expecting to lose money, which means every opportunity to put some crap in the premium store will be top of the list. SuperCV, subs, SupportCV, these will be what they will be aggressively pushing, wouldnt be a surprise if they push subs to the server quicker now regardless of how dumb they are. I would genuinely not expect any new maps before 2024.

Are you saying you have no instances of aggressive play that results in large amounts of fail? You can ask for whatever you want in randoms, chances are you are not going to get it... I see collapses as much in yolo as i do in people enjoying a glue lunch in the back. More than anything it depends on the rest of the players.

So not many. Cool. Oh please... I would stop comparing yourself to El2 if i were you btw.

Yes, feel free to count how many because i cant be bothered. Probably around 20-30 in total to see how they played, and that was way back when they were first introduced. Not sure what your point is.

My CV stats are from pre CV rework, you know, when actual skill to play them was required and throwing away your planes was a real possibility and hurt a lot. If you misplayed you got punished for it and you could be rendered useless for the rest of the game. That doesnt happen now. People can play as braindead as possible and still succeed to some degree. Im not interested in playing CV, but i absolutely guarantee you that if i did play them i could increase my winrate a lot. Just like most other people could... Thats the point. That CV appear to be easier to perform in because they are broken.

If their 'solution' is as ham fisted and ridiculous as CV and sub balance, the company is doomed.

Again, comparing ships to ship classes Facts are facts though. Hence most CV players have MUCH better stats in CV than all other ship classes. Who said anything about 'recent'? My belfast games account for 3.9% of my played games. Your CV games account for almost 50% of your total battles, dont try telling me that i have padded my stats in a belfast with less than 4% of battles, or that it is comparable to your almost 50% of games and difference in performance... As i said, across all ship types my stats are fairly equal across the board. Belfast had pretty much zero impact on those numbers.