Hades_warrior

But, they do agree with everything we say!

Nah. Not a big fan of low tiers. To slow ships make me sleepy. And for Iron Duke. Well... he share the destiny of other T5s.

Silence is offen proven to be unspoken confirmation

I did expect it. And yet, he is stil most trusted player in WoWS according to many players. If not the only fully legit. Which is sad, ofc. if Flamu can do mistakes (and stil hold his respect level), dont know why people like Notser, iChase, Aerroon couldn't do too. Any hint when we can expect their release? Early Septembar? Mid Septembar? Only thing we know (by Octavian) is ''very soon'', but he told that 1-2 weeks ago, if im not wrong.

I wanna play every (or atleast most) of the RN BBs, but this time ill skip tiers 3 and 4 and go straight to 5 with blueprints. Usualy I dont skip ships in any line, tho its stil pain in the [edited]to grind low tiers.

I completed all 5 this time, and I knew in advance it will be a time wasting for me. Next 2 weeks ill do just first 3 missions for blueprints. Bismarck missions was diferent, and you could to play it casual. No preasure with conditions ''in one battle''. You will get better in this game by playing Random, as many to. I doubt proving yourself in weekly missions is the way to go.

Yap. RN BB haters probably wont whyning so much about those BBs when they actualy wont have super heal. Atleast not regular line bellow tier 9. I didnt see any super heal on KGV nor Monarch and lower tiers, alteast not the one that heals 50% HP at once as Conqueror and Nelson do. Ocean's salt level will drop. Wait, what? Something that Flamu told is untrue? Im in shock Maybe the math says that to you, but my eyes tells me different. I saw poor damage on Conqueror with 457s setup, which I didnt expect it. But on 419 was good. It could be a big role of RNG involved but stil, few rounds with each setup test is enough (atleast for me). 419 is more flexible setup, to use AP and HE. But in the end, WG wants us to use both type of shells, and RN BB's are heavily expected to use HE anyway.

Yes, its require 150k damage but you missing the key part; You dont need to finish all 5 missions every week to get blueprints, just the first 3. And those are easy. Rewards for 5th missions are not worth to wasting time on them anyway.

Yea, they will, and its more likely later then sooner. Missouri is 750k free EXP, and for anyone who have dilema between them I would go for Mo. Extra credit grinder is extra credit. You must be sitting on a lot of free EXP.

If you test it yourself then its the diferent perspective. From what I saw 457s main issue is dispersion. Those dual gun turrents dont have dispersion like triple guns. Notser even compared that with Bismarcks guns. Not very accurate for its tier. 170-286k damage on T7-8 battles? From what I saw (watching stream myself) damage on i.e. KGV and Monarch was satisfied, 90+k per battle is nothing weaker then Amagi or NC. As many of you (if not most) taking Flamu's opinion as only valid, I think that guy is overrated. He can be good at this game, but why others shouldn't be legit too just because they have different aspect of view.

Dont know which stream did you watch, but from what I saw today all from tier 7 to 10 are amazing ships. Nothing personal against you. but speaking of this I trust more to Notser's testing on stream (and my own eyes) then yours. I cant wait to start play KGV and Monarch. Im sure there wont be any problems nor difficulties. Those 457mm are on papper. In battle, those extra 4 guns with 419mm (12 guns in total) really hits harder then 8x 457mm.

Not really. According to Notser it have soft armor.

https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/common/fish-and-ships/

Here is the list of missions, what are rewards and date of activity - https://worldofwarships.eu/en/news/common/fish-and-ships/

Same opinion. And from what I saw on Notser' stream, Monarch is a very good ship. Might be the 2nd best ship of T8.

Its not about my personal opinion about it, but the indication of something that many of you might missed, and yet might not like it.

Its not all about shell speed... And im not the only one who like her. There is a lot of others too. I need to calm down? For what? ''Something more relevant next time''?. Oh boy...

+1 She have sweet guns, nice traverse, really great AA.

It doesn't require to fight at close ranges at all. I play her close, mid, even long rage without any problems. Sometimes get citadels with her on 20 km distance.

Nope, Colorado is not better then NC. Not even in dreams. NC hits prety hard. You need to learn to aim better. When you get some experience (or IF), you will see how much NC is fun to play. NC is my most played ship. Yea, you might be the only one.

You guys who cant wait to get Nelson; have you saw the citadel position? Well, in short > ''old Iowa syndrome''

https://www.twitch.tv/notser Notser is playing RN BB's. atm is Monarch and ship is awesome.

Shut up! There is plenty of players who get a real trash from SC's like instal modules, and you complain on 50k free EXP and flags. Even if you are joking on this stil, not funny...

If you want Iron Duke T5 you will need +2 blueprints, so 3 in total. Every weekend will come set of mission for 1 blueprint, up to 3 weeks in total. 1st week (this) is 1 blueprint - unlock T3 BB 2nd week is 2nd blueprint - unlock T4 BB 3rd unlock T5. So every next ship after T3 cost +1 blueprint from previous.

KGV in blue camo (200 free EXP) is so beautiful. Btw I like the immersion across superstructures of the ships at 1:00 min.