KillStealBoss

I have all of them bob. So you can have zero battles and argue about playing T10s based o na spreadsheet and experience of other players. So gave you the right to speak on behalf of the playerbase and their stats? Who do you think you are?

He's just having not enough coal to get it - that's why he's talking BS here. I think its also the reason why he doesn't have the Salem. Lol. Idk why he's playing at all if he jest comes here with his arguments based on other players performance.

What a useless post here that doesn't tell anything. No more arguments I guess. Git Gud and play more Zao. Cause you have zero to offer. A very loud emptiness. I'm asking you one more time - why would anyone play the game and just argue with others about spreadsheets? You play only to show off in forum "see I have some battles played?" Pathetic.

I think they will implement them after they get some stats in ranked. The coop implementation is to give people a chance to at least see how they play before going into ranked.

Dude nobody is looking at per tier but as a ship. Per tier Donskoi is also better cause it can see T7 ships. That's really poor argument. Well I'm multiposting so it won't be a super long post so people won't read it. While you just spam one sentence post in multiple places in forum which no one normal does that especially if it's a a topic like that which needs explanation. Spreadsheet won't explain for you much - just look at your Austin. Very good investment 😂 based on spreadsheet . Well done there. Why do you even play the game, anyone can come here and based on some stats and spreadsheet you can say this ship is good or bad having no idea about anything in the game. Forum is also a place when we discuss our OPONIONS (say it again OPINIONS) but seems like you have none of that. Cause you don't play T10. And don't come with "T10 no fun" argument. Cause if it's no fun then don't engage in topics about T10 ships. You can go to some Azuma thread.

Dutch DDs too.

You see you're very wrong here. Yoshino has the 30mm deck anlike 27 on Azuma, it has better gun reload than Azuma, it has more range than Azuma and 20km zoning torps that are a bonus damage. I have both ships. It's not the same. It's close but not the same. It's like saying why to play Nevsky when you have the Donskoi. The basic is the same but overall they differ.

So maybe go make a survey asking people how do they feel about the Zao? Oh yeah you won't do that, better to spam posts.

While I consider your T10 performance as potato at best, especially after being in same team with you. Playing at almost max range, tunnel vision, zero support. You played a Republic like in a Yoshino 🤣 Also if you see server stats of an Austin you can think "oh yeah that's an amazing ship" but having non existent experience on T10 like you do - you went to buy the Austin and.... Yeah . You are way worse than an average Joe on it. If I see you in Austin in my team is better just quit to port cause why to bother ? Especially when you play no divisions and you go solo with Austin having no clue how to play it well. Anyway. This little off top above is just an example to not trust server stats and spreadsheets and going to buy a ship based on that. So yeah Mr Colonel - Git Gud on T10. Play more Zao.

*playstyle It's not only me btw. I meant other people as well. As I said if you were spending time playing Zao instead of posting 200 posts a day here in forum - you would understand what I mean. T10 ships are museum exhibits in your port right now, try maybe play them decently. And buy the Yoshino to compare it. Being a very mediocre person on cruisers - yes I do . If a unicuum can do well - yes he can. If he can do better in other ships in same situation - yes.

And just like Flamu said - if you want to play Zao just take a Nevsky. You have great 22km range with no spotter plane needed , decent AA and troll armour, speed and a bonus - radar. So why would anyone play Zao? Torps? Take a Yoshino. So yeah do you have any arguments why to play Zao? Maybe if you were playing Zao as much as you sit here in forum - maybe you would understand me. But what can you understand after just 19 battles on that ship that you probably played 2-3 years ago.

But they actually show something - Zao needs help in survivability. It needs more hp - bring back the 48k hp to it, the range should be 17.5km as a minimum. When Zao was introduced there was no other BB from Yamato to be a super problem for her. Now you have Ohio Thunderer Vermont Kremlin Shikishima Musashi Georgia And upcoming Incomparable and potentially the super BBs the Hanover and Satsuma might be included after several nerfs. And you get also Stalingrads, Alaskas, Petro... And if you're super unlucky you can get a decent player on Richtofen that goes after you with AP rocket planes. Enjoyable experience when you have 17.5km range with legendary upgrade Zao with spotter plane. Also I'm not the best at cruisers but still play the crappy Yoshino nowadays better than Zao. You can play on Zao and get decent result. But it's not amazing to play at all... It's a struggle. Went people play DM ? Cause it's a reliable ship that can carry a game. Zao can't. Unless in a division. Something that you don't almost play having only 11% of your battles in division 😂

Yeah I also noticed that in all other IJN BBs. Especially on Hizen - so much inaccurate at sub 10km sometimes....

I quoted too much text there. All I meant is 30mm deck. And it can be overmatched by a lot of BBs these days. You won't get citadeled but you still can east 15-18k dmg while if GK was shooting maybe you'll take 5k. Significant difference.

No it doesn't perform worse than Zao now. Go and see my stats not only my opinion. If you're so much in numbers.

Yeah because you don't even have a Yoshino so how can you even talk about it that it's worse than Zao? Cause I'm having much more comfortable time playing Yoshino and much better stats too. You know why? Cause even though people say Yoshino can be deleted fast - my survivability on it is pretty high so I can INFLUENCE the battle better. You even don't play T10s much, as veteran player with only 6% of your battles on T10 🤣 So you base your opinion not on your own experience or overall feeling the ship - but on numbers of other people. Pathetic.

*406mm and below. A lot of those T10 BBs don't give a crap about the 30mm...

So take each one of those into battles few times and then you can say if you had same impact on the games or better.

Division super carry of a team that just gave up fighting. Very satisfying.

Ha? 🤦🏻‍♂️

Do tego też tier jest ważny. Jak strzelasz jako T6 do T8 to z tych obrażeń dostaniesz więcej expa niż jakbyś strzelał do innego T6 czy tym bardziej do okrętu niższego tieru.

It's even worse on NA when you get 8v8 or 9v9 on high tier games in early evening hours (east coast time).

But you are playing only coop from what you've once said, is it that problematic there?

On 0.10.7 the result screen bug will be fixed but not the torps bug. I was playing PTS and it still was buggy in terms of torps.

Salem is older and it's not going anywhere. WG isn't removing a ship cause it's old - they look at popularity and effectiveness. And from that side Marceau is pretty good and effective. It's also pretty popular. And these are the reasons why it might be taken out.