Babykim

The HE spam cannot be removed because it is an essential integral balancing element for ships such as destroyers and some cruisers. American and Russian destroyers, as well as Russian cruisers would lose all competitiveness without HE spam.

Does not work with me.

There is another reason (besides losing being a waste of time), the outcome of a battle is the only factor shared by the players. I have nothing from the fact that someone else on my team has had a "good time", yet my stats go down when we lose "together". In other words, losing (winning) imposes a negative (positive) externality on the teammates, whereas having "good time" remains a private benefit. Get the point?

Incorrect. Just like a real currency, in-game currency is the currency accepted in game. It can be earned anywhere. The USD is a legal tender (currency) in the United States. Yet USD can be earned, for example, in China. So, I hope, they really mean what they say.

for the time being, yes...

Sorry to break it to you, but your chances are nil. Especially after posting. Imagine you get it fixed and tell us about it, the WG office will be swamped with similar requests.

This game is about winning only, not only because it is a game, but also because not winning is a massive waste of time. Why? Because the exp and credits bonus you get for winning is much larger than what you get for damage. So anyone who is purely after damage (don't care if I win) is a pure stat-padder with little concept of the game, although damage and winrate strongly correlate. Just that the first is meaningless without the second. Best is of, course, large damage and win. And please don't come with "having fun"...

You are totally right that WoT has a more varied gameplay because the vehicles move faster and landscape is more complex. But I just like ships more than tanks.

FYI: A similar thread on the RU sever is well and active: http://forum.worldofwarships.ru/index.php?/topic/62946-%d0%b8%d0%bd%d1%84%d0%b0-%d1%81-%d0%ba%d0%b8%d1%82%d0%b0%d0%b9%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%be%d0%b3%d0%be-%d1%81%d0%b5%d1%80%d0%b2%d0%b5%d1%80%d0%b0/ A double standard? No, we have the better of it, because our forum managers are protecting us from inaccurate information. Thank you!

In September (rumour from the Russian community)

So the ship will be released in her current configuration: 1. Post-war superstructure 2. No torpedoes 3. 1944, i.e. wartime, camo

I see why BBs may have difficulties of Estuary. It is not easy to switch flank once committed, and the many islands block line of sight. But this is not the worst map. But to me, the worst map is still Shatter.

so true...

The official version: unmoored German mine

The connection between the Novorossiysk and La Decima is anything but proven.

I believe that unequal treatment of different servers, in any respect, causes only grief at no gain for the company. As if different regions were competing against each other.

Points 2) and 3) are around for a very long time. I get the impression that the developers mention Kitakami und Cleveland when they have nothing better to say. Concerning the celebrations, I expect then to discount all premium ships that I have previously purchased at full price. Btw. some vague rumors (pinch of salt) from the RU server say that the Scharnhorst is coming in August but the Dunkerque is scheduled for September.

Here is a summary of the digest by getfun of a stream with Vlegris 1). IJN Zao, which is known to have better average stats than all other tier X cruisers, will not be nerfed. The other cruisers will be somewhat buffed instead. 2). When a new US cruiser branch is released, USS Cleveland will be moved to a higher tier, whereas USS Baltimore might be moved to a lower tier. When all this will happen is unknown. 3). IJN Katakami is not considered as an award for ranked battles. The developers are still thinking what to do with it. It might appear at the end of the year. 4). The 17th of September is the birthday of World of Warships. The developers will try their best to please the players, especially the veterans. Source:

Well nobody questions the fact that Kiev was once a Polish city. There is an inconsistency in translations, that's all. I sense stronk WG logic at work

But there is a Polish name for almost any geographic location (Nowy Orlean, etc.). Well anyway... Just thought it was peculiar. By the same logic Köningsberg must be called Kalinigrad in the Russian version, because not only did they have it, they still do. Strange.

It is funny that in the Polish versions of the game "Kiev" is traslated in Polish, but another townname "Nürnberg" (would be "Norymberga") is not. WTF is this conspiracy? P.S.: or York, or New Orleans, or Colorado, or New Mexico...

10 Euros, and has complete Royal Navy, German Navy, with submarines, dds, all kinds of cruisers, battleships, different kinds of carriers and land-based planes. Plus realistic gameplay and decent graphics. Single player http://store.steampowered.com/app/420440/?l=english