Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Kirasa

Beta Tester
  • Content Сount

    1,520
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    1524

Everything posted by Kirasa

  1. A large part of the EU playerbase is germanspeaking, which you can see also from the forumhits: 299k (english forum) vs 218k (german forum) Since the english community includes players from many different countries (including german speaking natives) you have to compare that to the german community which consists mostly of german speaking natives from three countries. Not forgetting that Germany in general is a large market for computer games, which makes it more or less an easy decision for which countries to go first: Those that make the most money.
  2. Kirasa

    MA der Schlachtschiffe

    Das ist aber auch immer eine Frage des Kalibers, da du mehr oder weniger davon ausgehen kannst, das kleines Kaliber wenig Pen hat, großes Kaliber halt viel. AP bei 127mm Kanonen hat gerade genug Pen um durch die Hülle von DD zu gehen und dann dort Schaden zu machen, ohne Over-Pen. Wenn du als DD mit deinen 127mm Kanonen anfängst mit AP auf BB zu schießen nur weil die Muni "Panzerbrechend" ist, dann machst du definitiv was falsch.
  3. For Bugs: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/12148-known-bugs-issues/
  4. Kirasa

    Does WG favor some people with T10 carriers?

    Pierre2010 is also a Tester
  5. Kirasa

    IJN Träger Tier IX Taiho

    Japanische Community auf dem Asia Server.
  6. Kirasa

    IJN Träger Tier IX Taiho

    Shinano wird dann wohl im zweiten CV Baum der IJN als T10 kommen. Und Hakuryuu ist Taihou Kai sozusagen.
  7. Kirasa

    The Most Unnecessesary Captain Skill...

    Carrier Captains for the Dive Bombers.
  8. Appparently they want to give the IJN planes other torps and bombs and they wanted to check the difference the spread makes in damage differences between good and bad players first... Still stupid.
  9. Kirasa

    Does WG favor some people with T10 carriers?

    A simple forum search would have given you the answers to your questions: The new CV were given to CV players with high Tier experience and good stats for a quick balancing test regarding the max damage possible with those CV. And it does not screw up the MM, since we already had a T9 CV (Essex) ingame. They will be added later for everyone when WG is sure that they're not to overpowered. And no, it couldn't be done on the ST Server due to reasons (like playerbase etc)
  10. Kirasa

    Taiho, another way to screw us over?

    Which won't be true anymore, when the CV will be available for all players. Still enough AA to get rid of planes highlighting you, which DD AA is all about in this game. And the position of the AA on the ship is not calculated into shooting planes down.
  11. Kirasa

    Taiho, another way to screw us over?

    You sure? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akizuki-class_destroyer_(1942)
  12. Lern einfach mal die DB richtig zu nutzen, dann macht man damit auch vernünftig Schaden und mehr als mancher BB im Match macht...
  13. Kirasa

    The real problem with carriers

    Ever thought about it that way, that only the good CV players bother to post on the forum?
  14. Kirasa

    Aircraft Carrier - few questions

    DB are no waste, if you know how to use them: And these were the worse 4 plane IJN DB, not the 6 plane USN DB.
  15. Kirasa

    Keine neuen schiffe bis zu OBT?

    Mit denen brauchst du frühestens in der OBT rechnen.
  16. The high RNG is in the damage roll IF you hit.
  17. Kirasa

    Sekundärbewaffnung/FlaK An/Abschalten

    Einfach die Preferences.xml im Spielverzeichnis löschen. Danach mußt du zwar alle Einstellungen wieder neu machen, aber die Tasten funktionieren wieder so, wie sie sollen.
  18. T1: Better AA, T2: Faster TB reload (or higher scouting range), T3: Sit Awareness
  19. Kirasa

    Torpedo Diskussion

    Long Lance Torps waren aber auch nicht sichtbar ;)
  20. Sorry, but 1/3rd of your 300 games are in the Cleveland, you seriously lack experience and objectivity regarding different classes through different Tiers.
  21. I don't see a problem with a skilled player wracking damage on the field. Apart from the fact that, no, not every TB run did result in a destroyed BB. Add to that the horrendous AA of USN BB, and you won't have planes very long if you attack them all the time. And you forgot the IJN TB in your list at the end, since they're very much USELESS right now.
  22. They'd have to tripple the damage to make IJN CV viable or make the torps barely visible. I really hope that they already see after two days with this idiotic single change that not many play IJN CV anymore. I mean you barely see one in the matches, but 3 USN CV. That should give them the message to do their step by step balancing better and maybe with a LOT more communication.(Or just undo this Idiocy)
  23. I don't see a problem with "noobs don't do much damage because they're to dumb to use manuel drop" with the IJN CV. No one complains that you need to be able to do Hull Down with US Tanks in WoT to be good. So why don't they just keep it that you need to be able to do a good manual drop for IJN CV? If people can't hit good with Auto drop they should change THAT one, and not the manual drop.
  24. The easy solution would be for people to stop playing IJN CV completly. If no one plays them anymore, they'll change it back really fast.
×