Kirasa

Trying to hit DDs? Don't even bother with CA...

Yeah, the approach from the moon is horrible. Coupled with the slower speed means the only thing you can hit now are BBs who have targetfixation. Don't even bother trying to hit DD or CL/CA.

Jo, weil du all (Daten seit Beginn der Aufzeichnung, inkl Buffs/Nerfs, andere Spielerzahlen etc.) und nicht term (Daten der letzten Woche, ohne Buffs/Nerfs, mehr oder weniger gleiche Spielerzahl) genommen hast.

Destroyed. It's a must on IJN High Tier DD though. You shouldn't get hit anyway.

You can already get the better AA Barrage with shorter CD for gold or creds. And seriously, who here used the Barrage more than 3 times in a match yet? Spamming for fighters does not count.

Wie immer: Warshipstats ist nur gut um die Daten einzelner Spieler anzugucken. Die generellen Schiffsdaten sind korrumpiert, da sie alles beinhalten, was es seit dem Wipe gab, inklusive Buffs/Nerfs. Deswegen NIE warshipstats für Schiffsvergleiche nutzen. Außerdem hat die Seite nur die Daten der Spieler, die dort abgefragt wurden. Hermelin ist letzte mit 100 Schaden hinter Erie, also nicht der Rede wert. Dabei ist ihre WR 4% höher, hat mehr Kills und eine bessere K/D Dresden ist das beste T2 Schiff mit Abstand. Kolberg liegt im Schaden zwischen Tenryuu und St. Louis, hat aber die beste Killrate und beste K/D. Karlsruhe liegt abgeschlagen hinten. Königsberg liegt nur hinter der Marblehead, ansonsten bester Schaden, beste WR, beste Killrate und beste K/D Nürnberg... auf T6 liegen alle Schiffe ca gleichauf Dadrüber ist die Datenlage noch dünn. Quelle: http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/index.html Termdata Week 2015/10/24

morti271, hab ich von WR geredet? Ich sagte Stats. D.h.: WR, Schaden, Kills, Flugzeuge, K/D Bei allem liegen so gut wie alle deutschen Schiffe recht gut im Mittelfeld.

Aus dem PT build: All ships have an increased flooding chance when hit, particularly destroyers and carriers. This means that destroyers and carriers are significantly more vulnerable to flooding. (or the opposite, direct value is "floodProb" went in most cases from 0.500 to 0.580, to the extreme case of Midway which went from 0.125 to 0.433, this change should only be really visible to ship torpedoes as their baseline flooding chance hasn't been cut in half like plane torpedoes) Siehe auch: http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/55803-patch-0510-pt1-real-changelog/

I am still missing the detection range buff for IJN DD Type90/93 torps (as in -33% to -50%)

Pro Flieger bekommst du so viel xp als ob du 2.5% HP Schaden an nem Schiff machst. Und 40 Flieger = 2 Träger stimmt ja noch nichtmal auf T4.

Wann nutzt du den Skill schonmal wirklich öfter als 3mal? Und zu dem ZONE Modus, nochmal richtig lesen. Nicht der erste gewinnt. Wenn natürlich die Gegner alles nur Angsthasen BBs sind, die hinten campen, und sich keiner ins Cap traut, dann ja...

Die Stats sagen leider was anderes aus, nämlich daß auf den meisten Tier die deutschen Kreuzer sehr wohl mithalten.

You get +100% xp with the camo, so if you would make 750ep standard it's worth it, since 750 free xp = 30 gold. If you make more base xp the camo is obviously better, if less than free xp is better.

Viele scheinen aber echt eine zu rosarote Brille in Bezug auf die Geschichte der Deutschen Marine aufzuhaben...

So, they're writing the name with macron, can they now finally do it for the other IJN ships too?

Das Upgrade was +16% bringt. Ist kein Modul, sondern unten.

Und die Flugzeit der Geschosse auf der Reichweite?

Dafür müssten die deutschen genug Modelle verfügbar haben um eine komplette CL Linie von T1 bis T10 zu füllen und eine CA Linie von T* bis T10 (ab wo auch immer geteilt wird) Erstmal werden die Teilungen eh für USN und IJN kommen.

Solltest du als CL/CA Skipper eh IMMER.

Don't use warshipstats for anything but single player stats. The data there are corrupted a) due to the selection bias by only tracking the stats of players who are searched there and b) because they use all data from the wipe on incl buffs/nerfs. Use http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/index.html That page has weekly stats without buffs/nerfs included.

Just half the spotting distance for IJN torps, that would bring a lot already.

Please don't use warshipstats for ship comparison, since the data there is a) incomplete (only tracked players are included) and b) corrupted due to including everything from somewhere at the start of the OBT, incl changes due to buffs and nerfs. If you want pure data try http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/index.html and look at the term data (as in only last week) so that you compare the current ships without any changes done to them. The list is either under avarage/Ship or if you use the flash version at the top with the right settings.

If they really go back to the old spread than that would mean WG finally accepted that some of the changes they did since 0.3.1 are just plain bad or that they just can't balance them.

Why do people still recommend the by now obsolete CV sniping? That was already obsolete at the end of the CBT. First: As a CV you should always be directly at your fleet right outside of detection range of the enemy fleet. Gives you additional AA right around you, so that CV sniping is pure and simple IMPOSSIBLE. Also trying to do it wastes way too much time, since you have to go around the border of the map with your planes while searching for the enemy CV. Second: In the OBT everyone was complaining about the IJN Strike Decks, WG removed them and added the (useless and crappy) IJN AS decks. Now everyone complains about IJN having too many fighters in the air. Take your pick. Either that or the old strike decks. Third, as for your decks: Stock 1/1/1? You have to live with enemy Indis with 2/0/1 Deck or Ryuujous with 3/1/2 Decks. They WILL have AS and you have to be opportunistic. Same for your 0/1/2 Deck. Want to do much damage with your Indi? Then you'll have to take this deck, but don't even dare to complain about a Ryuujou with 3/1/2 Deck. The old 0/3/3 Deck would have given you a lot of leeway to do damage, but again. People (incl USN CV players) complained about that and wanted it gone. Now live with it. Lastly your 2/0/1 Deck. Now you'll have AS, regardless of what the enemy has. If you can't control the Air with that deck you are doing something wrong. Especially with the strong USN Bias in form of the T3 commander Skill Dogfighting Expert which only buffs USN Fighters. Add the Upgrade for more Aircraft gun damage on your CV and the enemy CV won't have a chance. Sure you won't do much damage, unless you have an eye for the field and can see who has just repaired. Bomb them with your DB and see them burn. IJN CV are only a problem for a fleet if it spreads. Teamplay as in staying together makes the job much easier for you. If your team doesn't care you shouldn't care that the enemy CV sinks them.

You decide pre match and have to live with your decision.