IamTroublemaker

I'd still buy the Warspite... At least they are getting some offers, all we got so far is 20€ T2 ship bundle

How did this topic end up here. I thought its in Ships/Cruisers

Yeah, I agree. They also got this http://worldofwarships.asia/en/news/specials-and-events/premium-shop-20151201/ We can't see what the prices are until tomorrow tho and they still got 3 different Tirpitz bundles which I hope EU server (AND OTHER SERVERS) will get soon.

I just... don't know what to say

I never though somebody would see "RN fanboy" as an insult, but if you feel like I'm insulting you by saying it I will stop and I don't see how it is a hyperbole. I'm not anti-RN, I'm just saying it will come eventually and that there is no point in both asking "where is RN" or debating if it should have been earlier in game because that question has been answered already.

Exactly. No one is saying RN didn't have any impact, but every RN fanboy seems to take it that way when you say USN and IJN were a good choice...

Well, you have more confidence in me than myself. I see someone has reached rank 6, gz The truth has been spoken! Same here, I don't care about the flags as much as about those credits.

I wish I could reach rank 1 just so I don't have to play ranked anymore...

And there has to be a reason why are they doing it. If they did it the first two times, why do you think they'd do it the 3rd time? We were never led that the Royal Navy would be in game from the start, or at least I don't remember single statement from WG or its staff backing that up. Yes, I agree RN would bring more UK players, but I also believe that Austro-Hungarian navy would bring more Austrians, Hungarians and the other nations that were the part of that empire at the time. French navy would bring more French players and so on...

Check the post from damo74 at page 6, that's why I wrote my post the way I wrote it. He clearly said it is the thinks the lack of RN 'drove a lot pf players away'. Now, I always thought 'a lot of' means majority. That is why I used the word 'main'. So yeah, overstatement for an overstatement.

I think he was sarcastic... And yes, same here. I'd love to see Richelieu and Dunkerque because they are different and they are gonna arrive eventually, but I'm not boycotting the game because they aren't in yet and that's why I think that the fact there is no RN is not the main reason people might leave the game

When I think of warships (and that is World wars warships) the first thing that comes to my mind is Yamato. That is the first battleship I've heard of with quite a few others. The first RN ship I've heard of was KGV and it was due to a game called Battlestations. I seriously don't understand the RN fuss, its basically acting like kids if you refuse to play because there is no RN even though we all know it will come. Did you start playing this game to try and see the variety of ships, learn about them or just play 30-40 ships (I guess RN tree will contain that much ships)?

You cant compare Fifa with WoWs as Fifa is released as a finished game with only minor tweaks being released from time to time while WoT and WoWs are practically still beta games. As I said, Bismarck was just taken as an example. WG said a few times that they had better access to KM and SN ships + even though you might not like it, but Russians play this game the most, and it's understandable they got their ships sooner. As for the iconic tanks. Yes, WoT had them, but people were still asking for British, French and other nations and WG has probably learned something from it. I don't know exactly what they had in mind but I guess that they didn't want to release all the "good" stuff immediately and leave some stuff for later? Also there were much more iconic ships (from much more different nations) than tanks, and as we know, ships need much more time to model...

My mistake then, I thought you were trying to say certain ships will help you win "easier" in ranked. You are right, people tend to judge others just if they are driving a premium ship, but it's because of quite a high amount of newbies buying high tier premium ships, although that doesn't mean there aren't good players behind those ships

Not even close. I bet you 100€ that more people would rather play for example, Bismarck than any other RN ship. But that's not the point here. It is mostly UK players that want the RN NOW, and saying that it should have been implemented long time ago. Yes, it had a big historical impact, but you will see that not a lot of players care about historical impact of a certain ship but just want to play a game that contains ships. Now don't get me wrong, I like RN and I hope to play with it soon, but saying that "snub to the Royal Navy drove a lot of players away" is a complete nonsense.

The "night" map is just the North with relatively bad light effects (at least on one side, the other one looks nice). Islands of ice is the map that is played on T8+ if I recall. That is because the map is quite big and lower tiers would take longer time to get into each other range. All maps depend on tier. I don't know the tier spread for each map, but afaik T4-T7 have the most maps to play on.

It was announced some time ago that forum will undergo a change.

Ship choice doesn't influence the win % in ranked a lot. I compared your ranked Tirpitz stats to my Amagi stats. We almost got the same stats in our ships (I got a bit more avg dmg/xp) and you have 88% win while I have 38% win. It's the 6 other people you get...

Capturing bases gives quite a good bonus now. It also depends how much % of ships HP you took away, not the damage. Killing 40 planes equals killing the same tier ship. Doing 10k dmg to a DD is more "worth" than doing 10k dmg to a BB, because it matters how much HP % you took.

Well, credit earning depends on how much ships hp % you took out, how much bases did you cap/defend and so on. EDIT: Also you earn much more credits in PvP than in PvE

This. I normally enjoy a good battle whether its a win or lose, but sometimes you give 300% and it seems like the rest of the team just came out of the teletubbies show. I wanna see at least 1-2 more competent players in my team, otherwise its just a pain.

The "early days" excuse won't last for much longer if they continue working with this pace. I still believe 2016. will be the year this game will "explode" since it was said KM BBs, SN CAs (Q1) and RN (Q4) will come then and hopefully some things will change by then, but my patience and expectations are slowly being lowered by recent WG EU actions and non-actions.

Bundles should be sold when there is enough content in the premium store so we actually have some choice, this way we don't and sadly, that is one of the main reasons why I'm slowly stopping with the game. I need credits to buy ships, currently I'm 4-5 ships behind and I need a T8 premium ship so I can earn more credits. Just look at WoT (I know its an older game), it took them YEARS before they started selling bundles, after they've had enough premium tanks content. Here, the only T8 I can buy is Atago and that is just sad and gives me no choice at all.

Ehm, you gotta pay for the ship repair, ammo, consumables after the battle.

There is no need to call him all kinds of names because he probably isn't aware of what's going on and thinks its all normal and fair.