IamTroublemaker

In a 1v1 against a Montana, the Yamato doesn't even need a healing ability. If they are facing each other, bow towards the bow, Yamato will wreck the Montana without taking almost any damage while he will citadel the Montana multiple times. Sadly, thats how most of Yamatos play these days, just sit in a spot and snipe with 2 frontal turrets because no one can harm them properly that way.

Let me introduce you to this therm and its meaning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

I can see why some parents might have gotten butthurt, I still think its funny tho. But seriously, trying to make a joke and not offend anyone in 2015. be like:

maybe because you are 6 months too late?

Ahhh yes, I was the "Hacker" according to their Fubuki in that battle Oh yes, I am no longer late into battles! Thx WG

I think it will be a gift for Christmas/New year, just like we get T2 premium tanks in WoT every year.

the goal isnt/shouldn't be pure profit but the balance between bigger profit/happy community. One of the first things my marketing professor told me is that "a happy customer will pay more" and therefor a happy player will bring more profit to WG.

Just seen a few in my last 2 battles. They don't seem like bad ships overall. Didn't have time or luck to properly test their citadel as I got teamkilled

You can buy it with credits...

No info on the depot yet?

IJN ones have dual gun turrets. And while US DDs are gunboats, IJN ones have much better camo values/torps so I don't see whats the problem. Both of those nation DDs excel at different stuff. Also US DDs have horrible shell arcs which makes it really hard to hit stuff at longer ranges.

So far it was mostly the opposite, most of people were whining that US DDs are so UP, did that torp range buff really change everything?

Sorry, rank 1 wankers are not allowed

My exact reaction So it looks like H39 and H41 will be T9/T10 I think Deutschland could be T3, with Scharnhorst on T4? EDIT: I think we actually might see two different lines of BB leading to T5 or something like that?

Indeed, we did go a bit offtopic Anyway, I think its the same for BBs, you do need the same amount of luck (if not more) to one shot a cruiser from certain distances as any decent cruiser player will try to avoid the incoming shells (same goes for BB vs DD). I do miss carriers a bit, only so the likes of Yamato wouldn't just stay in one spot and snipe, but I don't miss being one shot by an Essex or Midway even after doing my best to avoid all the incoming planes (while failing to kill almost any of them). Also, I wasn't calling out for more citadels, but less overpens. Of course I'd rather get a citadel hit, but when one lands more than 5 shells (on various spots) on a CAs broadside, I kinda find it stupid that all of them overpenetrated, but it was all just really really really bad RNG...

Yeah, but I highly doubt inactive WoT players would transfer to WoWs... I mean, how would they get the data then? I believe there is a certain amount of players that hasn't played any WG games before WoWs. Therefor the number of 250k seems a bit unrealistic for me. Yeah, but they didn't say it caused problems, just that it is a problem and I agree there. There is also one more thing I find quite funny. They say that RU players whine about the performance more? I somehow cannot see that. I believe that overall NA and EU players have the better "machinery" and since the game is so badly optimised, some of us aren't event getting the 50% of the performance we should be getting, while that isn't much of a problem on older PCs (I played WoT with more fps on my 9 year old PC than on my 5 year old laptop, that has much better components).

I was about to post that There is no way that much players left WoT for WoWs, the numbers speak for themselves. Even if you put all the servers together, we don't even have the half of it. Although its possible they've left WoT for WoWs and then left WoWs...

That is all I am talking about. It is impossible to take down a Yamato in a Montana, especially when Yamato just sits and shoots with his front guns. I even get citadelled through the stern or bow by Yamatos. The only reason I started with the "CA mafia" is because people tend to put every battleship player in the "BB mafia" and I am really sick of it. NOT EVERY BATTLESHIP PLAYER IS A WHINY [edited]. I prefer having quite a few DDs in the opponent team, I like dodging torps, I like cruisers setting me on fire, I like cruisers trying to torp me, it makes the game fun for me. But being unable to deal any damage to DDs (because I cant spot them), being unable to deal damage to Yamato, and being unable to deal proper damage to Zao that was dealing x5 more damage to me per salvo did pissed me off. Eh, I'm not that kind of whiny [edited]. I don't know of there is a DD that cannot "one shot" a BB of his tier, IJN cruisers can do that as well, although it depends on the situation a lot more. My whole point was about Montana vs other ships (especially Yamato), also check what I wrote previously in this post. The whole point of my posts were that Montana does need a buff, to be able to deal at least some damage to Yamato, and as soon as I said it I saw a therm "BB mafia"

I quite disagree there, the reload of 25 seconds feels much faster and surprises a lot of ships. You also get to land much more hits which means more damage, and thus credits and xp

Ahhh, the "CA mafia" again. If the high tier games were dominated by BBs only, don't you think that adding a T8 premium cruiser would reduce that since a lot of people will by and play that cruiser? And just so you know, they are dominated by DDs now, but I understand, even if WG removes BBs, people would still say "BB mafia", "too much BBs in high tiers"!

No, I came here to whine, knowing nothing about aiming... I'd rather keep overpenning the "CA mafia" than being unable to do almost any damage to the likes of Yamato. Also by that logic, Yamato should be overpenning every cruiser in game, but I don't see that happening so I think a pen buff would actually help.

That's probably true, but also shows that people saying that CAs are so underpowered compared to THEIR COUNTERS and calling them "BB mafia" is just ridiculous as I've had these kind of stuff happen to me a lot!

Don't think the AA is weaker than on Cleve, the DPS is quite strong and the range is good. As for arcs, I strongly believe they will be much much better on this ship than on Cleve and the torps seems relatively good, 8 km is fine for a CA

Could it be that they've made a mistake and it's actually a T7? I think it would fit much better there...

The website was off for some time and for some reason the ranked stats that are being shown are from the previous season.